Endovascular treatment of acute symptomatic infrarenal aortic aneurysm in a patient with bilateral atherosclerotic renal artery disease and chronic kidney disease: a case report
- Authors: Zatevakhin I.I.1,2, Matyushkin A.V.1,2, Mustafin A.K.1,2, Frantsevich A.M.1,2, Zoidov M.N.1
-
Affiliations:
- N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University (Pirogov University)
- Pletnev City Clinical Hospital
- Issue: Vol 33, No 4 (2025)
- Pages: 569-576
- Section: Clinical reports
- URL: https://ogarev-online.ru/pavlovj/article/view/373780
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/PAVLOVJ630485
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/KTEEXW
- ID: 373780
Cite item
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Currently, X-ray endovascular technologies in the amount of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) are widely used not only in the treatment of scheduled patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm, but also in emergency situations, such as acute symptomatic aneurysm or its rupture, as an alternative to an open surgery. Endovascular treatment is characterized by minimal trauma, low mortality and a short hospital stay. However, for some patients, EVAR poses significant challenges and risks. One such group is patients with chronic kidney disease due to atherosclerotic lesions of the renal arteries.
The article discusses a clinical case of a 67-year-old patient with an acute symptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysm, 5 cm in diameter, with a prominent concomitant cardiac pathology and stage IV chronic kidney disease (glomerular filtration rate 25 ml/min/1.73 m2) with the underlying critical stenosis of both renal arteries (subocclusion on the left and 85% stenosis on the right). The patient underwent emergency surgery in the amount of infrarenal aortic grafting and stenting of both renal arteries using gadodiamide. A reduction in the volume of contrast agent administered was achieved by stenting the renal arteries before EVAR. As a result, the stents, due to their radiopaque properties, were used as a guide for localizing the renal arteries during endograft placement. The postoperative period was uneventful, except for an early postoperative increase in blood creatinine up to 344 µmol/l and stabilization at this level. The patient was transferred to the vascular surgery department for symptomatic treatment. With infusion therapy, the blood creatinine level decreased to 270 µmol/l. On day 5, the patient was discharged for outpatient follow-up at the place of residence.
CONCLUSION: This clinical case demonstrates a possibility of performing endovascular intervention in patients with stage IIIb–IV chronic kidney disease, due to, on the one hand, improvement of endovascular technologies, and, on the other, reduction of the volume of contrast agent used during surgery.
About the authors
Igor I. Zatevakhin
N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University (Pirogov University); Pletnev City Clinical Hospital
Email: i.zatevakhin@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9303-1855
SPIN-code: 4329-3755
MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor, Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation, Moscow; MoscowAndrey V. Matyushkin
N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University (Pirogov University); Pletnev City Clinical Hospital
Email: 7279507@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4112-7732
SPIN-code: 5794-6214
MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor
Russian Federation, Moscow; MoscowAydar K. Mustafin
N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University (Pirogov University); Pletnev City Clinical Hospital
Author for correspondence.
Email: aidm@inbox.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9831-4988
SPIN-code: 3280-4934
MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)
Russian Federation, Moscow; MoscowAleksey M. Frantsevich
N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University (Pirogov University); Pletnev City Clinical Hospital
Email: alxfra@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0800-6592
SPIN-code: 9118-9600
MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)
Russian Federation, Moscow; MoscowMubinjon N. Zoidov
N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University (Pirogov University)
Email: muchroomman@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0006-1002-4892
Russian Federation, Moscow
References
- Sawang M, Paravastu SCV, Liu Z, et al. The Relationship Between Operative Volume and Peri-operative Mortality After Non-elective Aortic Aneurysm Repair in Australia. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2020;60(4): 519–530. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2020.04.029 EDN: WYEEOH
- Batrashov VA, Kostina EV, Chernyago TYu. Pirogov’s contribution to vascular surgery. Bulletin of Pirogov National Medical & Surgical Center. 2020;15(3, Pt 1):85–94. doi: 10.25881/BPNMSC.2020.34.19.016 EDN: NNPIJO
- Dubost C, Allary M, Oeconomos. [Aneurysm of the abdominal aorta treated by resection and graft]. Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 1951;44(9): 848–851.
- De Bakey ME, Cooley DA. Surgical treatment of aneurysm of abdominal aorta by resection and restoration of continuity with homograft. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1953;97(3):257–266.
- Volodos NL, Shekhanin VE, Karpovich IP, et al. Samofiksiruyushchiysya protez dlya otdalennogo endoprotezirovaniya aorty. Vestnik Khirurgii imeni I.I. Grekova. 1986;137(7):123-125. (In Russ.)
- Parodi JC, Palmaz JC, Barone HD. Transfemoral intraluminal graft implantation for abdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann Vasc Surg. 1991;5(6):491–499. doi: 10.1007/bf02015271
- May J, White GH, Yu W, et al. Endoluminal grafting of abdominal aortic aneurysms: causes of failure and their prevention. J Endovasc Surg. 1994;1:44–52.
- Davidovic LB, Ducic S. Is there a role for open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm in the endovascular era? J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2021;62(6):652–653. doi: 10.23736/s0021-9509.21.12045-2 EDN: ZZPIZT
- Marone EM, Freyrie A, Ruotolo C, et al. Expert Opinion on Hostile Neck Defi nition in Endovascular Treatment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms (a Delphi Consensus). Ann Vasc Surg. 2020;62:173–182. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2019.05.049 EDN: IYXBWJ
- Davidovic L, Koncar I. Chapter 12. Elective and emergent repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: selection of open or endovascular strategy. In: Settembrini P, Settembrini AM, editors. Vascular Surgery. A Clinical Guide to Decision-making. Elsevier; 2022. P. 145–156. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-822113-6.00018-8
- Suckow BD, Goodney PP, Columbo JA, et al. National trends in open surgical, endovascular, and branched-fenestrated endovascular aortic aneurysm repair in Medicare patients. J Vasc Surg. 2018;67(6):1690–1697.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.09.046
- Varkevisser RRB, O’Donnell TFX, Swerdlow NJ, et al. Fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair is associated with lower perioperative morbidity and mortality compared with open repair for complex abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2019;69(6):1670–1678. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.08.192
- Wang SK, Lemmon GW, Gupta AK, et al. Fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair-induced acute kidney injury does not result in chronic renal dysfunction. J Vasc Surg. 2019;69(6):1679–1684. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.09.044
- Castagno C, Varetto G, Quaglino S, et al. Acute kidney injury after open and endovascular elective repair for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2016;64(4):928–933.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.02.048
- Saratzis A, Nduwayo S, Sarafi dis P, et al. Renal Function is the Main Predictor of Acute Kidney Injury after Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair. Ann Vasc Surg. 2016;31:52–59. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2015.10.010
- Ellis JH, Cohan RH. Prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy: an overview. Radiol Clin North Am. 2009;47(5):801–811,v. doi: 10.1016/j.rcl.2009.06.003
- Gupta RK, Bang TJ. Prevention of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy (CIN) in Interventional Radiology Practice. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2010;27(4): 348–359. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1267860
- Bäuerle T, Saake M, Uder M. Gadolinium-based contrast agents: What we learned from acute adverse events, nephrogenic systemic fibrosis and brain retention. Rofo. 2021;193(9):1010–1018. doi: 10.1055/a-1328-3177 EDN: FKPBCW
- Busutti M, Sensoni A, Vacirca A, et al. Renal Benefits of CO2 as a Contrast Media for EVAR Procedures: New Per-spectives on 1 Year Outcomes. J Endovasc Ther. 2024;31(6):1180–1189. doi: 10.1177/15266028231162258
- Woolen SA, Shankar PR, Gagnier JJ, et al. Risk of Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis in Patients With Stage 4 or 5 Chronic Kidney Disease Receiving a Group II Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agent: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Intern Med. 2020;180(2):223–230. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.5284 EDN: IDYJAT
Supplementary files

