Prognostic value of BAP1 protein expression in uveal melanoma
- 作者: Kim I.D.1, Grishina E.E.1, Setdikova G.R.1
-
隶属关系:
- Moscow Regional Research and Clinical Institute
- 期: 卷 18, 编号 2 (2025)
- 页面: 7-16
- 栏目: Original study articles
- URL: https://ogarev-online.ru/ov/article/view/312607
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/OV635584
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/KWQOUK
- ID: 312607
如何引用文章
详细
BACKGROUND: Uveal melanoma is the most common malignant ocular tumor in adults. It carries a high risk of metastatic spread and death. Typical clinical and morphological signs fail to provide accurate disease prognosis. Thus, investigations of molecular markers such as BAP1 expression are warranted to improve survival prediction and optimize treatment strategies.
AIM: The work aimed to determine the prognostic value of the histological type of uveal melanoma and BAP1 expression for survival of patients.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of the data of 68 patients with uveal melanoma who received curative treatment. A standard procedure was used for the morphological examination of enucleated eyes. BAP1 protein expression was evaluated using immunohistochemistry. Survival was analyzed using Kaplan–Meyer methods and a Cox proportional hazard model.
RESULTS: Median survival in patients with homo- or heterogeneous (focal, mosaic) loss of BAP1 expression was 48 months, whereas patients with homogeneous BAP1 expression of variable degree (mild to severe) did not achieve the median by the end of follow-up. The log-rank test showed statistically significant differences between these groups (χ2=4.344; p=0.037). Mortality risk for patients with homo- or heterogeneous loss of BAP1 expression was 2.6 times higher (HR=2.602, 95% confidence interval: 0.573–0.96). However, mortality risk for patients with epithelioid cell and mixed tumor types was only 1.27 times higher than for patients with spindle cell cancer (HR=1.265, 95% confidence interval: 1.062–2.846).
CONCLUSION: The study highlights the importance of using molecular genetic methods, including immunohistochemistry of BAP1, to predict disease outcomes more accurately.
作者简介
Igor Kim
Moscow Regional Research and Clinical Institute
编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: eyelena@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7575-5043
俄罗斯联邦, Moscow
Elena Grishina
Moscow Regional Research and Clinical Institute
Email: eyelena@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2668-9136
MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor
俄罗斯联邦, MoscowGaliya Setdikova
Moscow Regional Research and Clinical Institute
Email: galiya84@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5262-4953
MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine)
俄罗斯联邦, Moscow参考
- Singh AD, Turell ME, Topham AK. Uveal melanoma: trends in incidence, treatment, and survival. Ophthalmology. 2011;118(9):1881–1885. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.01.040
- Grishina EE, Lerner MY, Gemdzhian EG. Epidemiology of uveal melanomas in Moscow. Almanac of Clinical Medicine. 2017;45(4): 321–325. doi: 10.18786/2072-0505-2017-45-4-321-325 EDN: ZCQVAP
- Aronow ME, Topham AK, Singh AD. Uveal melanoma: 5-year update on incidence, treatment, and survival (SEER1973–2013). Ocul Oncol Pathol. 2018;4(3):145–151. doi: 10.1159/000480640
- Postow MA, Kuk D, Bogatch K, Carvajal RD. Assessment of overall survival from time of metastastasis in mucosal, uveal, and cutaneous melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(15S):9074. doi: 10.1200/jco.2014.32.15_suppl.9074
- Berus T, Halon A, Markiewicz A, et al. Clinical, histopathological and cytogenetic prognosticators in uveal melanoma — A comprehensive review. Anticancer Res. 2017;37(12):6541–6549. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.12110
- Kaliki S, Shields C, Shields J. Uveal melanoma: Estimating prognosis. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2015;63(2):93–102. doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.154367
- Robertson AG, Shih J, Yau C, et al. Integrative Analysis identifies four molecular and clinical subsets in uveal melanoma. Cancer Cell. 2017;32(2):204–220.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2017.07.003
- Harbour JW, Onken MD, Roberson ED, et al. Frequent mutation of BAP1 in metastasizing uveal melanomas. Science. 2010;330(6009):1410–1413. doi: 10.1126/science.1194472
- Stålhammar G, See TRO, Phillips S, et al. Digital image analysis of BAP-1 accurately predicts uveal melanoma metastasis. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2019;8(3):11. doi: 10.1167/tvst.8.3.11
- Bornfeld N, Prescher G, Becher R, et al. Prognostic implications of monosomy 3 in uveal melanoma. Lancet. 1996;347(9010): 1222–1225. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)90736-9
- Kilic E, van Gils W, Lodder E, et al. Clinical and cytogenetic analyses in uveal melanoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47(9): 3703–3707. doi: 10.1167/iovs.06-0101
- van de Nes JA, Nelles J, Kreis S, et al. Comparing the prognostic value of BAP1 mutation pattern, chromosome 3 status, and BAP1 immunohistochemistry in uveal melanoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2016;40(6):796–805. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000645
- Kalirai H, Dodson A, Faqir S, et al. Lack of BAP1 protein expression in uveal melanoma is associated with increased metastatic risk and has utility in routine prognostic testing. Br J Cancer. 2014;111(7):1373–1380. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.417
- Biscotti CV, Singh AD. Uveal melanoma: diagnostic features. Monogr Clin Cytol. 2012;21:44–54. doi: 10.1159/000331030
- Shain AH, Bagger MM, Yu R, et al. The genetic evolution of metastatic uveal melanoma. Nat Genet. 2019;51:1123–1130. doi: 10.1038/s41588-019-0440-9
- Herwig-Carl MC, Sharma A, Holler T, et al. Spatial intratumor heterogeneity in uveal melanoma: Tumor cell subtypes with a presumed invasive potential exhibit a particular epigenetic staining reaction. Exp Eye Res. 2019;182:175–181. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2019.04.001
- Pandiani C, Strub T, Nottet N, et al. Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals intratumoral heterogeneity in primary uveal melanomas and identifies HES6 as a driver of the metastatic disease. Cell Death Differ. 2021;28:1990–2000. doi: 10.1038/s41418-020-00730-7
- Mensink HW, Vaarwater J, Kilic E, et al. Chromosome 3 intratumor heterogeneity in uveal melanoma. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50(2): 500–504. doi: 10.1167/iovs.08-2279
- Stålhammar G, Grossniklaus HE. Intratumor heterogeneity in uveal melanoma BAP-1 expression. Cancers (Basel). 2021;13(5):1143. doi: 10.3390/cancers13051143
- Kwon J, Lee D, Lee SA. BAP1 as a guardian of genome stability: implications in human cancer. Exp Mol Med. 2023;55(4):745–754. doi: 10.1038/s12276-023-00979-1
- Mroz EA, Rocco JW. MATH, a novel measure of intratumor genetic heterogeneity, is high in poor-outcome classes of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol. 2013;49(3):211–215. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2012.09.007
- Landau DA, Carter SL, Stojanov P, et al. Evolution and impact of subclonal mutations in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Cell. 2013;152(4):714–726. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.01.019
- Zhang J, Fujimoto J, Wedge DC, et al. Intratumor heterogeneity in localized lung adenocarcinomas delineated by multiregion sequencing. Science. 2014;346(6206):256–259. doi: 10.1126/science.1256930
- Patel AP, Tirosh I, Trombetta JJ, et al. Single-cell RNA-seq highlights intratumoral heterogeneity in primary glioblastoma. Science. 2014;344(6190):1396–1401. doi: 10.1126/science.1254257
- Zaretskiy A, Yarovaya V, Nazarova V, et al. Molecular testing of stage I–III uveal melanoma in the context of conservative or surgical treatment: our experience. Problems in oncology. 2018;64(5):625–632. doi: 10.37469/0507-3758-2018-64-5-625-632 EDN: VKVVIX
- Yarovaya VA, Yarovoy AA, Zaretsky AR, et al. Molecular genetic testing of uveal melanoma in eye saving treatment. Practical medicine. 2018;(3): 213–216. EDN: YXOSLZ
- McLean IW, Foster WD, Zimmerman LE, Gamel JW. Modifications of Callender’s classification of uveal melanoma at the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology. Am J Ophthalmol. 1983;96(4):502–509. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)77914-0
- Gamel JW, McLean IW, Foster WD, Zimmerman LE. Uveal melanomas: Correlation of cytologic features with prognosis. Cancer. 1978;41(5):1897–1901. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(197805)41:5<1897::aid-cncr2820410534>3.0.co;2-2
补充文件
