Enamel and dentin microhardness of deciduous and permanent teeth formed in fluoride-iodine deficiency
- Authors: Akhmedbeyli RM1
-
Affiliations:
- Azerbaijan Medical University
- Issue: Vol 99, No 4 (2018)
- Pages: 625-628
- Section: Theoretical and clinical medicine
- URL: https://ogarev-online.ru/kazanmedj/article/view/9203
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/KMJ2018-625
- ID: 9203
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Aim. To study the microhardness of enamel and dentin of deciduous and permanent teeth formed in fluoride-iodine deficiency.
Methods. Enamel and dentin microhardness was examined on sections of 47 deciduous and 43 permanent teeth. Six topographic zones were examined on each tooth section, 24 imprints were performed. Enamel and dentin microhardness was determined on PMT-3M device and by Vicker’s Hardness Test with a load of 50 g for 5 seconds.
Results. Enamel and dentin microhardness of permanent teeth is higher than that of deciduous ones. In the surface layer of enamel the microhardness of permanent teeth is 2.33-2.09 times higher compared to deciduous teeth (in incisors - by 2.24 times, canines - by 2.09 times, molars - by 2.33 times); 2.25-1.94 times higher in the middle layer (in incisors - by 2.17 times, canines - by 1.94 times, molars - by 2.25 times); 2.15-1.89 times higher in the enamel layer at the enamel-dentine junction (in incisors - by 2.15 times, canines - by 1.89 times, molars - by 2.03 times). In the dentin layer at the enamel-dentin junction, dentin microhardness of permanent teeth is 1.90-1.71 times higher than of deciduous ones (in incisors - by 1.78 times, canines - by 1.71 times, molars - by 1.90 times); 2.14-2.0 times higher in the middle dentin layer (in incisors - by 2.08 times, canines - by 2.0 times, in molars - by 2.14 times); 2.05-1.71 times higher in the near-pulp layer (in incisors - by 2.05 times, canines - by 1.71 times, molars - by 1.87 times).
Conclusion. Enamel and dentin microhardness of deciduous and permanent teeth formed in fluoride-iodine deficiency varies considerably; microhardness of hard tissues of permanent teeth is approximately 2 times higher than that of deciduous teeth.
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
R M Akhmedbeyli
Azerbaijan Medical University
Author for correspondence.
Email: mic_amu@mail.ru
Baku, Azerbaijan
References
- Akhmedbeyli R.M., Safarov A.M., Mamedov F.Yu. et al. The effect of fluoridated and iodized salt consumption by schoolchildren on acid solubility of permanent teeth enamel. Kazanskiy meditsinskiy zhurnal. 2016; (4): 565–571. (In Russ.)
- De Menezes Oliveira M.A., Torres C.P., Comes-Silva J.M. et al. Microstructure and mineral composition of dental enamel of permanent and deciduous teeth. Microsc. Res. Tech. 2010; 73 (5): 572–577. doi: 10.1002/jemt.20796.
- Eimar H., Ghadimi E., Marelli B. et al. Regulation of enamel hardness by its crystallographic dimensions. Acta. Biomaterialia. 2012; 8: 3400–3410. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2012.06.002.
- Gutierrez-Salazar M.P., Reyes-Gasga J. Microhardness and chemical composition of human tooth. Mater. Res. 2003; 6 (3): 367–373. doi: 10.1590/S1516-14392003000300011.
- Gnjato S. Addition to the methodology of research into permanent teeth hardness. Arch. Biol. Sci. 2010; 62 (3): 739–746. doi: 10.2298/ABS1003739G.
- Fuentes V., Toledano M., Osorio R., Carvalho R.M. Microhardness of superficial and deep sound human dentin. J. Biomed. Mater Res. 2003; 66 (4): 850–853. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.10064.
- Shakila N., Ali A., Zaidi S. Micro hardness of dental tissues influenced by administration of aspirin during pregnancy. Int. J. Morphol. 2015; 33 (2): 586–593. doi: 10.4067/s0717-95022015000200028.
- ISO 6507-1: 2005. Metallic materials — Vikers Hardness Test — Part 1: Test method. (https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:37746:en (access date: 02.06.2018).
- Aydin B., Pamir T., Baltaci A. et al. Effect of storage solutions on microhardness of crown enamel and dentin. Eur. J. Dent. 2015; 9: 262–266. doi: 10.4103/1305-7456.156848.
- Bedini R., Manzon L., Fratto G., Pecci R. Microhardness and morphological changes induced by Nd:Yag laser on dental enamel: an in vitro study. Annali dell’Istituto Superiore di Sanità. 2010; 46 (2): 168–172. doi: 10.4415/ANN_10_02_10.
- Buchalla W., Imfeld T., Attin T. et al. Relationship between nanohardness and mineral content of artificial carious enamel lesions. Caries Res. 2008; 42 (3): 1571–1563. doi: 10.1159/000128559.
- Galo R., Contente M.M., Galafassi D., Borsatto M.C. Hardness and modulus of elasticity of primary and permanent teeth after wear against different dental materials. Eur. J. Dent. 2015; 9: 587–593. doi: 10.4103/1305-7456.172635.
- Hazem E., Elnaz G. Regulation of enamel hardness by its crystallographic dimensions. Acta. Biomaterialia. 2012; 8 (9): 3400–3410. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2012.06.002.
- He B., Huang S., Jing J. et al. Measurement of hydroxyapatite density and Knoop hardness in sound human enamel and a correlational analysis between them. Arch. Oral Biol. 2010; 55 (2): 134–141. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2009.12.005.
- Zhang Y.R., Du W., Zhou X.D., Yu H.Y. Review of research on the mechanical properties of the human tooth. Intern. J. Oral Sci. 2014; 6: 61–69. doi: 10.1038/ijos.2014.21.
Supplementary files
