Spondyloptosis in children, adolescents and youth age patients

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The study aimed to analyze scientific publications on “Spondyloptosis in children, adolescents and youth age patients”. The article analyzes 77 literary sources for the period from 1995 to 2021, presented in modern electronic databases of medical information: PubMed, CyberLeninka, eLibrary, Google Scholar. The analysis of scientific articles showed that many important issues related to spondyloptosis in children have not yet been resolved. For example, the disease incidence rate in children and adolescents is unknown. To date, an algorithm for choosing a method for surgical treatment in this category of patients has not been defined, the need and methods for reduction of a displaced LV vertebra remain debatable, the spinal fusion length is not scientifically justified, measures to prevent the appearance or exacerbation of neurological disorders have not been developed, there are no generally accepted clinical and radiation criteria for evaluating treatment outcomes. It is recognized that the severity of clinical manifestations of spondyloptosis is associated with the degree of spinal-pelvic imbalance. The range of surgical interventions is wide: from “in situ” fusion at the LV–SI motion segment to 360° reconstruction with a change in the parameters of the lumbo-pelvic balance. Successful attempts are being made to introduce into clinical practice composite models of metal structures individually made on a 3D printer, specific to the spinal-pelvic balance of a particular patient. Many authors in their publications expressed that various aspects of LV spondyloptosis in children and adolescents require further study.

About the authors

Evgeny G. Skryabin

Tyumen State Medical University

Author for correspondence.
Email: skryabineg@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4128-6127
SPIN-code: 4125-9422
Scopus Author ID: 6507261198
ResearcherId: J-1627-2018

M.D., D. Sci., Prof., Department of Traumatology and Orthopedics

Russian Federation, Tyumen, Russia

References

  1. Gressot LV, Mata JA, Luerssen TG, Jea A. Surgical treatment of congenital thoracolumbar spondyloptosis in a 2-year-old child with vertebral column resection and posterioronly circumferential reconstruction of the spine co­lumn: case report. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2015;15(2):207–213. doi: 10.3171/2014.9.PEDS14151.
  2. Wild A, Jager M, Werner A, Euler J, Krauspe R. Treatment of congenital spondyloptosis in a patient for 18-months, follow-up 10-years. Spine. 2011;26(21):502–505. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200111010-00021.
  3. Lak AM, Abunimer AM, Rahimi A, Tafel I, Chi J, Lu Y, Groff M, Zaidi HA. Outcomes of minimally invasive versus open surgery for intermediate to high-grade spondylolisthesis: A 10-year retrospective, multicenter experience. Spine. 2020;45(20):1451–1458. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003573.
  4. Platunov VV, Kravchukov IV, Batrak YuM. Evaluation of the results of surgical treatment of true spondylolisthesis. Travmatologiya i ortopediya Rossii. 2013;(2):159. (In Russ.)
  5. Vissarionov SV, Murashko VV, Drozhdetsky AP, Krutelev NA, Belyanchikov SM. The modern approach to surgical treatment of spondylolisthesis in children. Hirurgiya pozvonochnika. 2009;(3):56–63. (In Russ.)
  6. Krutko AV, Sanginov AD, Giers MV, Alshevskaya AA, Moskalev AV. Surgical treatment of patho­logy of the lower lumbar spine in children and adolescents. Pediatric orthopedics, traumatology and reconstructive surgery. 2018;6(4):37–47. (In Russ.) doi: 10.17816/PTORS6437-47.
  7. Rivollier M, Marlier B, Kleiber JC, Eap C, Litre CF. Surgical treatment of high-grade spondylolisthesis. J Orthop. 2020;22:383–389. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2020.08.015.
  8. Junge H, Kuhl P. Appearance and significance of neural symptoms in lumbar spondylolisthesis and indications for operative management. Bruns Beitr Klin Chir. 1956;193(1):39–58.
  9. Meyerding HW. Spondylolisthesis, surgical fusion of lumbosacral portion of spinal column and interarti­cular facets; use of autogenous bone grafts for relief of di­sabling backache. J Int Coll Surg. 1956; 26(5 Part 1):566–591. PMID: 13367505.
  10. Wiltze LL, Newman PH, McNab I. Classification of spondylolisis and spondylolisthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1976;117:23–29. doi: 10.1097/00003086-197606000-00003.
  11. Mitbrejt IM. Spondilolistez. (Spondylolisthesis.) Moscow: Medizina; 1978. 272 p. (InRuss.)
  12. Marchetti PG, Bartolozzi P. Classification of spondylolisthesis as a guideline for treatment. In: Bridwell KH, DeWald RI, editors. The textbook of spinal surgery. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1997. p. 1211–1254.
  13. Mac-Thiong JM, Labelle H. A proposal for a surgical classification of pediatric lumbosacral spondylolisthesis based on current literature. Eur Spine J. 2006;15:1425–1435. doi: 10.1007/s00586-006-0101-4.
  14. Vidal J, Marnaj T. Morphology and anterposterior body equilibrium in spondylolisthesis L5–S1. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1983;69(1):17–28. PMID: 6222428.
  15. Ploumis A, Hantzidis P, Dimitriou C. High-grade dysplastic spondylolisthesis and spondyloptosis: Report of tree cases with surgical treatment and review of the lite­rature. Acta Orthop Belg. 2005;71(6):750–757. PMID: 16459872.
  16. Patel AJ, Vadivelu S, Desai SK, Jea A. Congenital hypoplasia or aplasia of the lumbosacral pedicle as an unusual cause of spondylolisthesis in the pediatric age group. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2013;11(6):717–721. doi: 10.3171/2013.3PEDS12579.
  17. Al-Sibay MW, Al-Havashka H. Spondyloptosis and multiple-level spondylolisis. Eur Spine J. 1999;8(1):75–77. doi: 10.1007/s005860050130.
  18. Yue W-M, Brodner W, Gaines RW. Abnormal spinal anatomy in 27 cases of surgically corrected spondyloptosis: Proximal sacral endplate damage as a possible cause of spondyloptosis. Spine. 2005;30(6):22–26. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000155572.72287.92.
  19. Min K, Liebscher T, Rothenfluh D. Sacral dome resection and single-stage posterior reduction in the treatment of high-grade high dysplastic spondylolisthesis in adolescents and young adults. Eur J Spune. 2012;21(6):785–791. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-1949-5.
  20. Yamashita K, Higashino K, Sakai T, Takata Y, Na­gamachi A, Sairyo K. Natural correction and adaptation of a severely deformed sacral dome in an adolescents with isthmic spondylolisthesis: A case report. JBJS Case Connect. 2017;7(2):e26. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.CC.16.00117.
  21. Gutman G, Silvestre C, Roussouly P. Sacral do­ming progression in developmental spondylolisthesis: a demonstrative case report with two different evolutions. Eur J Spune. 2014;23(2):288–295. doi: 10.1007/s00586-014-3306-y.
  22. Manabe H, Yamashita K, Higashino K, Morimoto M, Sugiura K, Ishihama Y, Tezuka F, Tаkata Y, Sakai T, Sairyo K. Bone formation during correction of vertebral rounding deformity in a rat model of pediatric spondylolisthesis. Spine. 2021;46(5):294–302. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003779.
  23. Curylo LJ, Edwards C, DeWald RW. Radiogra­phic markers in spondyloptosis: implications for spondylolisthesis progression. Spine. 2002;27(18):2021–2025. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200209150-00010.
  24. Skriabin EG. Spondylolysis and isthmic spondylolisthesis of the lower lumbar vertebrae in children and adolescents. Geniy ortopedii. 2017;23(1):71–73. (In Russ.) doi: 10.18019/1028-4427-2017-23-1-71-73.
  25. Kim HJ, Crowford CH 3rd, Ledonio C, Bess S, Larson AH, Gates M, Oetgen M, Sanders JO, Burton D. Current evidence regarding the diagnostic methods for pediatric lumbar spondylolisthesis: A report from the Scoliosis Research Society Evidence Based Medicine Committee. Spine Deform. 2018;6(2):185–188. doi: 10.1016/j.jspd.2017.08.010.
  26. Li Y, Hresko MT. Radiographic analysis of spondylolisthesis and sagittal spino-pelvic deformity. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2012;20(4):194–205. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-20-04-194.
  27. Mossaad MM. Spondylolisthesis. Res Rev Health Care Open Acc J. 2020;5(4):512–521. doi: 10.32474/RRHOAJ.2020.05.000219.
  28. Rajasekaran S, Aiyer S, Kanna RM. Hih-grade spondylolisthesis: Pediatric and adults. In: Lumbar spine online textbook. Section 19. Chapter 4. https://www.wheelessonline.com/issls/section-19-chapter-4-high-grade-spondylolisthesis-pediatric-and-adults/ (access date: 10.06.2021).
  29. Cavanilles-Walker JM, Ballestero C, Ubierna MT, Tomasi SO. Adult spinal deformity: Sagittal imbalance. Int J Ortop. 2014;1(3):64–72.
  30. Makirov SK, Yuz AA, Jahaf MT. Method of assessing the parameters of the sagittal spinal pelvic balance. Hirur­giya pozvonochnika. 2015;12(3):56–63. (In Russ.) doi: 10.14531/ss2015.3.55-63.
  31. Burtsev AV, Ryabykh SO, Kotelnikov AO, Gubin AV. Clinical issues of the sagittal balance in adults. Geniy ortopedii. 2017;23(2):71–73. (In Russ.) doi: 10.18019/1028-4427-2017-23-2-228-235.
  32. Ozer AF, Kaner T, Bozdoğan Ç. Sagittal balance in the spine. Turk Neurosurg. 2014; 24(1):13–19.
  33. Mehdian SMH, Arun R, Jones A, Cole AA. Reduction of severe adolescent isthmic spondylolisthesis: a new technique. Spine. 2005;30(19):579–584. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000181051.60960.32.
  34. Vialle R, Ilharreborde B, Dauzag C, Guigui P. Intra and inter-observer reliability of determining degree of pelvic incidence in high-grade spondylolisthesis using a computer assisted method. Eur J Spine. 2006;15(10):1449–1453. doi: 10.1007/s00586-006-0096-x.
  35. Diagnostika i lechenie spondilolisteza. Klinicheskie rekomendatsii Assotsiatsii travmatologov-ortopedov Rossii. (Diagnostics and treatment of spondylolisthesis. Clinical guidelines of the Association of Orthopedic Traumatologists of Russia.) Moscow; 2014. 36 p. (In Russ.)
  36. Virkki EN, Oksanen H, Diarbakerli E, Helenius L, Pape B, Pajulo O, Gerdhem P, Helenius I. Health-related quality of life outcomes of instrumented circumferential spinal fusion for pediatric spondylolisthesis: A comparison with age and sex matched healthy controls. Spine. 2020; 45(23):1572–1579. doi: 10.1097/brs0000000000003681.
  37. Grzegorzewski A, Kumar SJ. In situ posterolate­ral spine arthrodesis for grades III, IV and V spondylolisthesis in children and adolescents. J Pediatr Orthop. 2000;20(4):506–511. DOI: 10.097/00004694-200007000-00016.
  38. Geiger F, Wirries A. Spondylolisthesis in the gro­wing spine. Orthopade. 2019;48(6):494–502. doi: 10.1007/s00132-019-03742-5.
  39. Kunze KN, Lilly DT, Khan DM, Louis FK, Ferguson D, Basques BA, Nolte MT, Dewald CJ. High-grade spondylolisthesis an adults: cuttent concepts of assessment and treatment. Int J Spine Surg. 2020;14(3):327–340. doi: 10.14444/7044.
  40. Lonner BS, Song EW, Scharf CL, Yao J. Reduction of high-grade isthmic and dysplastic spondylolisthesis in 5 adolescents. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2007;36(7):367–373. PMID: 17694184.
  41. Syal A, Shah YB, Desai CV, Chandani SP. L5–S1 spondyloptosis: Surgical treatment by two staged GAINE'S procedure: A case report. IJSR. 2014;7(3):1–4. doi: 10.15373/22778179/July2014/170.
  42. Nakamae T, Tanaka N, Nakanishi K, Kamei N, Hamasaki T, Izumi B, Fujioka Y, Ohta R, Ochi M. Surgical treatment of high-grade dysplastic spondylolisthesis ­using intraoperative electrophysiological monitoring: report of two cases and review of the literature. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2013;23(1):121–127. doi: 10.1007/s00590-013-1199-9.
  43. Poussa M, Remes V, Lamberg T, Tervahartiala P, Schlenzka D, Yrjonen T, Osterman K, Seitsalo S, Helenius I. Treatment of severe spondylolisthesis in adolescence with reduction or fusion in situ: long-term clinical, radiologic, and functional outcome. Spine. 2006;31(5):583–590. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000201401.17944.f7.
  44. Ofluoglu AE, Hergunsel OB, Baydin S, Gunaldi O, Emel E. L5–S1 spondyloptosis treated by a single-stage posterior approach: an alternative technoloque. J Turk Spinal Surg. 2013;24(3):237–242.
  45. Schufflebarger HL, Geck MJ. High-grade isthmic dysplastic spondylolisthesis: monosegmental surgical treatment. Spine. 2005;30(6):42–48. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000155583.55856.f9.
  46. Ryabykh SO, Savin DM, Filatov EYu, Kotelnikov AO, Sayfutdinov MS. Outcomes of Surgical Treatment of High-Grade Spondylolisthesis (Monocenter Cohort and Literature Review). Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia. 2019;25(3):100–111. (In Russ.) doi: 10.21823/2311-2905-2019-25-3-100-111.
  47. Mitbreit IM, Glazyrin DI. Chaklin’s method of anterior spinal fusion. Hirurgiya pozvonochnika. 2017;14(1):91–99. (In Russ.) doi: 10.14531/ss2016.4.91-99.
  48. Wiltse LL, Bateman JG, Hutchinson RH, Nelson WE. The paraspinal sacrospinalis-splitting approach to the lumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1968;50:919–926. doi: 10.2106/00004623-196850050-00004.
  49. Gaines RW, Nichols WK. Treatment of spondylolisthesis by two stage L5 vertebrectomy and reduction of L4 onto S1. Spine. 1985;10(7):680–686. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198509000-00015.
  50. Gaines RW. L5 vertebrectomy for the surgical treatment of spondyloptosis: Thirty cases in 25-years. Spine. 2005;30(6):66–70. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000155577.19606.df.
  51. Kalra K, Dhar S. A modified Gaines procedure for spondyloptosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010;92(11):1589–1591. doi: 10.1302/0301-620Х.92В11.24382.
  52. A clinical case for discussion presented by the staff of the Department of Spinal Pathology of the Federal State Institution “CITO named after N.N. Priorov of Rosmedtekhnologii”. http://spineinfo.ru/infosources/case/cases_19.html (access date: 10.06.2021). (In Russ.)
  53. Cotrel Y, Dubousset J. A new technic for segmental spinal osteosynthesis using the posterior approach. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1984;70(6):489–494. PMID: 6239334.
  54. Dubousset J. Treatment of spondylolisis and spondylolisthesis in children and adolescents. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997;337:77–85. doi: 10.1097/00003086-199704000-00010.
  55. Afaunov AA, Polyukhovich EM, Afaunov AI, Shevchenko AV. Surgical treatment of severe spondylolisthesis: clinical case report. Hirurgiya pozvonochnika. 2008;(1):20–23. (InRuss.)
  56. Vissarionov SV, Murashko VV, Drozdetsy AP, Guseva IA, Kachalova EG. Results of surgical treatment of L5 spondyloptosis. Hirurgiya pozvonochnika. 2008;(4):20–23. (In Russ.)
  57. Sudarchan PK, Suthar HR, Varma VK, Krishnan A, Hegde SK. Long-term experience with reduction technique in high-grade spondylilisthesis in the young. Int J Spine Surg. 2018;12(3):399–407. doi: 10.14444/5047.
  58. Molinari RW, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Baldus C. Anterior column support in surgery for high-grade, isthmic spondylolisthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;(394):109–120. doi: 10.1097/00003086-200201000-00013.
  59. Lundine KM, Lewis SJ, Al-Aubaidi Z, Alman B, Howard AW. Patient outcomes in the operative and nonope­rative management of high-grade spondylolisthesis in children. J Pediatr Orthop. 2014;34(5):483–489. doi: 10.1097/BPO000000000000133.
  60. Martiniani M, Lamartina C, Specchia N. “In situ” fusion or reduction in high-grade high dysplastic developmental spondylolisthesis (HDSS). Eur Spine J. 2012;21(1):134–140. doi: 10.1007/s00586-012-2230-2.
  61. Xue X, Shen J, Zhang J, Li S, Wang Y, Qiu G. X-Ray assessment of the effect of pedicle screw on vertebra and spinal canal growth in children before the age of 7 years. Eur Spine J. 2014;23(3):520–529. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-3035-7.
  62. Ruf M, Harms J. Pedicle screw in 1- and 2-year-old children: technique, complications, and effect on further growth. Spine. 2002;27(21):460–466. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200211010-00019.
  63. Li J, Lu G, Wang B, Wang X, Lu C, Kang Y. ­Pedicle screw implantation in the thoracic and lumbar spine of 1–4-year-old children: evaluating the safety and accuracy by a computer tomography follow-up. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2013;26(2):46–52. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31825d5c87.
  64. Ranade A, Samdani AF, Williams R, Barne K, McGrit MJ, Ramos G, Betz RR. Feasibility and accuracy of pedicle screw in children younger than eight years of age. Spine. 2009;34(26):2907–2911. doi: 10.1097/BRS.ob013e3181b77af3.
  65. Stulik J, Geri G, Salavcova L, Barna M, Fojtik P, Nanka O. Pediatric dens anatomy its implications for fracture treatment: an anatomical and radiological study. Eur J Spine. 2021;30(2):416–424. doi: 10.1007/s00586-020-06490-9.
  66. Tandon V, Kaul R, Chharba HS, Nanda A. Dysplastic L5–S1 spondyloptosis in a 3-year-old child: A case report and review of the literature. Cas Rep Orthop. 2017;7:1892502. doi: 10.1155/2017/1892502.
  67. Liu SB, De Beritto TV. Congenital cervical spondyloptosis in the neonate: A prenatal diagnosis. Pediatr Ann. 2020;49(7):313–318. doi: 10.3928/19382359-20200629-01.
  68. O'Donnell M, Lavelle WF, Sun MH. Spondylolisthesis with spondylolisis in a 17-month-old: a case report. J Spine Surg. 2017;3(4):689–692. DOI: 21037/jss.2017.08.18.
  69. Dubousset J. Spine surgery in children: past, present and future. Hirurgiya pozvonochnika. 2021;18(1):78–85. (In Russ.) doi: 10.14531/ss2021.1.78-85.
  70. Bourassa-Moreau E, Labelle H, Mac-Thiong JM. Radiological and clinical outcome of non surgical management for pediatric high grade spondylolisthesis. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2010;158:177–181. doi: 10.3233/978-1-60750-573-0-177.
  71. Xue X, Wei X, Li L. Surgical versus treatment for high-grade spondylolisthesis in children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95(11):3070. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003070.
  72. Bourassa-Moreau E, Mac-Thiong JM, Joncas J, Pa­rent S, Labelle H. Quality of life of patients with high-grade spondylolisthesis: minimum 2-year follow-up after surgical and nonsurgical treatments. Spine. 2013;13(7):770–774. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.01.048.
  73. Vaishya R, Patralekh MK, Vaish A, ­Agarwal AK, Vijay V. Publication trend and knowledge mapping in 3D printing in orthopedics. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2018;9(3):194–201. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2018.07.006.
  74. Hsu MR, Haleem MS, Hsu W. 3D printing applications in minimally invasive spine surgery. Min Invas Surg. 2018;4760769. doi: 10.1155/2018/4760769.
  75. Burnard JL, Parr WCH, Choy WJ, Walsh WR, Mobbs RJ. 3D-printed spine surgery implants: a syste­matic review of the efficacy and clinical safety profile of patient-specific and off-the-shelf devices. Eur J Spine. 2020;29(6):1248–1260. doi: 10.1007/s00586-019-06236-2.
  76. Gerasimenko MA, Tesakov DK, Makarevich SV, Tesakova DD, Bobrik PA, Krivorot KA, Satskevich DG, Pustavoitau KV. 3D design and prototy­ping in surgical treatment of congenital spine deformities in children: the first experience. Hirurgiya pozvonochnika. 2021;18(1):24–30. (In Russ.) doi: 10.14531/ss2021.1.24-30.
  77. Parthasarathy J, Sribnick EA, Ho ML, Beebe A. Customised hybrid CT-MRI 3D-printed model for grade V spondylolisthesis in a adolescents. BMJ Case Report. 2021;14(3):239192. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2020-23.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

© 2022 Eco-Vector




Согласие на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика»

1. Я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных»), осуществляя использование сайта https://journals.rcsi.science/ (далее – «Сайт»), подтверждая свою полную дееспособность даю согласие на обработку персональных данных с использованием средств автоматизации Оператору - федеральному государственному бюджетному учреждению «Российский центр научной информации» (РЦНИ), далее – «Оператор», расположенному по адресу: 119991, г. Москва, Ленинский просп., д.32А, со следующими условиями.

2. Категории обрабатываемых данных: файлы «cookies» (куки-файлы). Файлы «cookie» – это небольшой текстовый файл, который веб-сервер может хранить в браузере Пользователя. Данные файлы веб-сервер загружает на устройство Пользователя при посещении им Сайта. При каждом следующем посещении Пользователем Сайта «cookie» файлы отправляются на Сайт Оператора. Данные файлы позволяют Сайту распознавать устройство Пользователя. Содержимое такого файла может как относиться, так и не относиться к персональным данным, в зависимости от того, содержит ли такой файл персональные данные или содержит обезличенные технические данные.

3. Цель обработки персональных данных: анализ пользовательской активности с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика».

4. Категории субъектов персональных данных: все Пользователи Сайта, которые дали согласие на обработку файлов «cookie».

5. Способы обработки: сбор, запись, систематизация, накопление, хранение, уточнение (обновление, изменение), извлечение, использование, передача (доступ, предоставление), блокирование, удаление, уничтожение персональных данных.

6. Срок обработки и хранения: до получения от Субъекта персональных данных требования о прекращении обработки/отзыва согласия.

7. Способ отзыва: заявление об отзыве в письменном виде путём его направления на адрес электронной почты Оператора: info@rcsi.science или путем письменного обращения по юридическому адресу: 119991, г. Москва, Ленинский просп., д.32А

8. Субъект персональных данных вправе запретить своему оборудованию прием этих данных или ограничить прием этих данных. При отказе от получения таких данных или при ограничении приема данных некоторые функции Сайта могут работать некорректно. Субъект персональных данных обязуется сам настроить свое оборудование таким способом, чтобы оно обеспечивало адекватный его желаниям режим работы и уровень защиты данных файлов «cookie», Оператор не предоставляет технологических и правовых консультаций на темы подобного характера.

9. Порядок уничтожения персональных данных при достижении цели их обработки или при наступлении иных законных оснований определяется Оператором в соответствии с законодательством Российской Федерации.

10. Я согласен/согласна квалифицировать в качестве своей простой электронной подписи под настоящим Согласием и под Политикой обработки персональных данных выполнение мною следующего действия на сайте: https://journals.rcsi.science/ нажатие мною на интерфейсе с текстом: «Сайт использует сервис «Яндекс.Метрика» (который использует файлы «cookie») на элемент с текстом «Принять и продолжить».