Quality of diagnosing acute poisoning by ambulance paramedics

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Aim. The assessment of quality of diagnosing acute poisoning by ambulance paramedics.

Methods. Retrospective analysis of the rate of diagnostic discrepancies and undifferentiated diagnoses in 1 242 patients delivered by ambulance paramedics of Kazan to the hospital with the diagnosis of acute poisoning.

Results. Referral diagnosis of acute poisoning among patients delivered by ambulance paramedics to the diagnostic department of the hospital was not confirmed in 792 cases, among which in 683 cases admission was not needed due to the absence of indications. Among refusals of hospitalization the majority of patients (70.8 %) were in the state of intoxication of various etiologies and healthy patients. In 8.5 % of cases of diagnostic discrepancies of acute poisoning paramedics delivered to the hospital patients with severe urgent somatic pathology - urosurgical, neurological, surgical, therapeutic, etc. The rate of diagnostic discrepancies in the group of alcohol, drug, undefined substances and mushroom intoxication was higher - 71.5 %, than in the group of medication and carbon monoxide intoxication - 39.7 %. In poisoning with impaired consciousness a direct dependence of the rate of diagnostic discrepancies on the rate of impaired consciousness was observed. The rate of undifferentiated diagnoses in the first group of poisoning was also higher - 82.3 %, than in the second group - 45. 8%, but no dependence on the impairment of consciousness was observed among patients.

Conclusion. High rate of diagnostic discrepancies (63.8 %) and undifferentiated diagnoses (71.1 %) are the consequence of lack of competence in medical toxicology among ambulance paramedics. In 98.2 % of cases, the probable etiological diagnosis of the disease, suspected as acute poisoning, in the study group of patients could be diagnosed using diagnostic methods available for paramedics.

About the authors

F Ya Khalitov

Kazan State Medical University

Author for correspondence.
Email: h_tox@mail.ru
Kazan, Russia

A F Khisamutdinova

Kazan State Medical University

Email: h_tox@mail.ru
Kazan, Russia

References

  1. Meditsinskaya toksikologiya: nacional’noe rukovodstvo. (Medical toxicology: national guide.) Ed. by E.A. Luzhnikov. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media. 2012; 928 p. (In Russ.)
  2. Kłys M., Kowalski P. Diagnostic medical error as an overinterpretation of toxicology screening combined with inadequate clinical assessment. Arch. Med. Sadowej Kryminol. 2011; 61 (4): 377–382.
  3. Li Y., Yu X., Wang Z., Wang H. Ethanol poisoning together with organophosphate exposure: a difficult clinical diagnosis because of physician anchoring. Alcohol alcohol. 2008; 43 (6): 650–652.
  4. Barsukova I.M., Glushkov S.O. Condition of quality of medical care when rendering the emergency medical service. Skoraya meditsinskaya pomoshch’. 2014; (3): 8–13. (In Russ.)
  5. Salikhov I.G., Akhmerov S.F. Neotlozhnye sostoyaniya v praktike terapevta. (Emergencies in internal medicine. Study guide.) Kazan: Idel-Press. 2007; 376 p. (In Russ.)
  6. Tarakanova L.I., Kozitsina F.G. Analysis of diagnostic discrepancies at prehospital phase. Skoraya meditsinskaya pomoshch’. 2001; (3): 67. (In Russ.)
  7. Graber M.L. The incidence of diagnostic error in medicine. BMJ Qual. Saf. 2013; 22: ii21–ii27. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001615.
  8. Heuer J.F., Gruschka D., Crozier T.A. et al. Accu­­racy of prehospital diagnoses by emergency physi­cians: comparison with discharge diagnosis. Eur. J. Emerg. Med. 2012; 19 (5): 292–296. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0b013e32834ce104.
  9. Kostopoulou O., Delaney B.C., Munro C.W. Diag­nostic difficulty and error in primary care — a systematic review. Family Practice. 2008; 25 (6): 400–413.
  10. Schiff G.D., Hasan O., Kim S. et al. Diagnostic error in medicine: analysis of 583 physician-reported errors. Arch. Intern. Med. 2009; 169 (20): 1881–1887. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.333.
  11. Singh H., Giardina T.D., Meyer A.N. et al. Types and origins of diagnostic errors in primary care settings. JAMA Intern. Med. 2013; 173 (6): 418–425. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.2777.
  12. Zwaan L., de Bruijne M., Wagner C. et al. Patient record review of the incidence, consequences and causes of diagnostic adverse events. Arch. Intern. Med. 2010; 170 (12): 1015–1021. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.146.
  13. Khusainova D.F., Sokolova L.A., Davydova N.S. et al. Analysis of diagnoses’ divergence of ambulance service in cardiovascular disease. Vrach skoroy pomoshchi. 2015; (3): 21–27. (In Russ.)
  14. Shchepin O.P., Medik V.A. Obshchestvennoe zdorov’e i zdravookhranenie. (Public health and health care.) Moscow: GEOTAR-Media. 2011; 592 p. (In Russ.)

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

© 2018 Khalitov F.Y., Khisamutdinova A.F.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed
under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.





Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).