Influence of psychosocial risk factors on the dynamics of indicators of temporomandibular disorders

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Aim. To analyze the influence of psychosocial risk factors on the dynamics of indicators characterizing temporomandibular disorders.

Methods. 61 clinical cases of temporomandibular disorders with chronic pain were investigated (18 % of the total number of observations of temporomandibular disorders). Diagnostic criteria of temporomandibular disorders were used: axis II, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of temporomandibular joint. Interviewing method was used for clinical diagnosis of psychological phenomena and testing attitude to the disease, identifying communicative deviations according to R.C. Rogers (2002). Patients were divided into 2 groups: group A - patients with nociceptive pain, social adaptation is not disturbed; group B - patients with neuropathic pain, psychosomatization on the background of mental rigidity. In both groups, an identical treatment regimen was implemented for two years. Statistical processing of the obtained data was carried out using IBM SPSS 21 and included comparison of related groups by Friedman analysis and paired Wilcoxon test, comparison of independent groups by Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon criterion, and comparison of the qualitative features by contingency tables by Chi-square Pearson.

Results. The radiological semiotics of temporomandibular joint in both groups is similar in the structure of nosology. At the beginning of the treatment cycle, the pain intensity and the temporomandibular index are similar. After 2 years of follow-up, patients in group A showed a significantly higher positive response to the therapy compared to patients in group B: pain intensity in group A was 15.36±2.53 and in group B - 37.32±3.45 (p<0.001); depression on the SCL-90-R scale - 0.29±0.04 and 1.12±0.12 (p<0.001), the degree of disability on the GCPS scale - 0.68±0.08 and 1.17±0.10 (p=0.001), temporomandibular index - 0.15±0.01 and 0.23±0.02 (p<0.001), respectively.

Conclusion. In patients of group B, affective disorders form the psychosomatic structure of personality and affect the outcome of therapy. When formulating the final diagnosis and planning the treatment in patients with temporomandibular disorders, it is necessary to take into account the psychosocial characteristics of the patient.

About the authors

O V Slesarev

Samara State Medical University

Author for correspondence.
Email: o.slesarev@gmail.com
Samara, Russia

I M Bayrikov

Samara State Medical University

Email: o.slesarev@gmail.com
Samara, Russia

O S Kovshova

Samara State Medical University

Email: o.slesarev@gmail.com
Samara, Russia

M V Komarova

Samara State Medical University; Samara National Research University n.a. academician S.P. Korolev

Email: o.slesarev@gmail.com
Samara, Russia; Samara, Russia

References

  1. Turner J.A., Dworkin S.F. Screening for psychosocial risk factors in patients with chronic orofacial pain: recent advances. JADA. 2004; 135 (8): 1119–1125. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2004.0370.
  2. Waddell G. Preventing incapacity in people with musculoskeletal disorders. Br. Med. J. 2006; 77–78: 55–69. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldl008.
  3. Gatchel R.J., Peng Y.B., Peters M. et al. The biopsychocial approach to chronic pain: scientific advances and future directions. Psychol. Bull. 2007; 133: 581–624. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.133.4.581.
  4. Slade G.D., Ohrbach R., Greenspan J.D. et al. Painful temporomandibular disorder: decade of discovery from OPPERA studies. J. Dent. Res. 2016; 95 (10): 1084–1092. doi: 10.1177/0022034516653743.
  5. Plesh O., Adams S.H., Gansky S.A. Temporomandibular joint and muscle disorder-type pain and comorbid pains in a national US sample. J. Orofac. Pain. 2011; 25 (3): 190–198. PMID: 21837286.
  6. Mendelevich V.D., Solov’eva S.L. Nevrozologiya i psikhosomaticheskaya meditsina. (Neuroscience and psychosomatic medicine.) Moscow: MEDpress-inform. 2002; 608 p. (In Russ.)
  7. Dubner R. Emerging Research on Orofacial Pain. J. Dent. Res. 2016; 95 (10): 1081–1083. doi: 10.1177/­0022034516661704.
  8. Harper D.E., Schrepf A., Clauw D.J. Pain Mechanisms and Centralized Pain in Temporomandibular Disorders. J. Dent. Res. 2016; 95 (10): 1102–1108. doi: 10.1177/0022034516657070.
  9. Dworkin S.F., Sherman J.J., Mancl L. et al. Reliability, validity, and clinicalutility of RDC/TMD Axis II scales: Depression, non-specific physical symptoms, and graded chronic pain. J. Orofacial Pain. 2002; 16: 207–220. PMID: 12221737.
  10. Ohrbach R., Turner J.A., Sherman J.J. et al. Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders: Evaluation of Psychometric Properties of the Axis II Measures. J. Orofacial Pain. 2010; 24 (1): 48–62. PMID: 20213031.
  11. Derogatis L.R., Lipman R.S., Covi L. SCL-90: An Outpatient Psychiatric Rating Scale—Preliminary Report. Psycho­pharmacol. Bull. 1973; 9 (1): 13–28. PMID: 4682398.
  12. Von Korff M., Ormel J., Keefe F.J. et al. Grading the severity of chronic pain. Pain. 1992; 50: 133–149. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(92)90154-4.
  13. Pehling J., Schiffman E., Look J. et al. Interexaminer reliability and clinical validity of the temporomandibular index: a new outcome measure for temporomandibular disorders. J. Orofac. Pain. 2002; 16 (4): 296–304. PMID: 12455430.
  14. Ohrbach R., List T., Goulet J.P., Svensson P. Recommendations from the International Consensus Workshop: Convergence on an Orofacial Pain Taxonomy. J. Oral Rehabil. 2010; 37 (10): 807–812. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02088.x.
  15. Dworkin S.F., Le Resche L. Research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders: review, criteria, examinations and specifications, critique. J. Craniomandib. Disord. 1992; 6: 301–355. PMID: 1298767.
  16. Rogers R. C. The art of counseling and therapy. Russ. ed.: Iskusstvo konsul’tirovaniya i terapii. Ed. by O. Kondrashova, R. Kuchkarova, T. Rozhkova et al. Moscow: Aprel’ Press, izd-vo Eksmo. 2002. 976 p. (In Russ.)
  17. Travell J.G., Simons D.G. Myofascial Pain and Dysfunction: The Trigger Point Manual. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, 1983. Russ. ed.: Miofastsial’nye boli. 2 Vol. Ed. by A.M. Veyn. Moscow: Meditsina. 1989. (In Russ.)
  18. Klineberg I., Jagger R.G. Occlusion and clinical practice: An evidence-based approach. 6th ed. Edinburgh: Wright. 2004. Russ. ed.: Okklyuziya i klinicheskaya praktika.. Ed. by M.M. Antonik. Moscow: MEDPress-inform. 2006. 200 p. (In Russ.)
  19. Slesarev O.V. Skull measuring methods in the analysis of temporo-mandibular joint tomography in man. Vestnik rossiyskogo nauchnogo tsentra rentgenoradiologii. 2013; 4 (13): 4. (In Russ.)
  20. Slesarev O.V., Trunin D.A., Bayrikov I.M. Cognitive-behavioral therapy for temporomandibular disorder complicated by chronic pain: challenges, prospects and limitations. Rossiyskiy stomatologicheskiy zhurnal. 2016; 20 (4): 205–209. (In Russ.)
  21. Kindler S., Samietz S., Houshmand M. et al. Depressive and Anxiety Symptoms as Risk Factors for Temporomandibular Joint Pain: A Prospective Cohort Study in the General Population. J. Pain. 2012; 13 (12): 1188–1197. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2012.09.004.
  22. Maixner W., Diatchenko L., Dubner R. et al. Orofacial pain prospective evaluation and risk assessment study: the OPPERA study. J. Pain. 2011; 12 (11 Suppl): T4–T11.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2011.08.002.
  23. Ohrbach R., Dworkin S.F. The evolution of TMD diagnosis: past, present, future. J. Dental Research. 2016; 95 (10): 1093–1101. doi: 10.1177/0022034516653922.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

© 2018 Slesarev O.V., Bayrikov I.M., Kovshova O.S., Komarova M.V.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed
under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.




Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).