Analysis of the course and outcomes of pregnancy in non-communicable liver diseases
- Authors: Zhestkova N.V.1,2, Ailamazyan E.K.1,2,3, Kuzminykh T.U.2
-
Affiliations:
- The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O. Ott
- Saint Petersburg State University
- Academician I.P. Pavlov First St. Petersburg State Medical University
- Issue: Vol 74, No 5 (2025)
- Pages: 23-35
- Section: Original study articles
- URL: https://ogarev-online.ru/jowd/article/view/363329
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/JOWD678809
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/OATJBY
- ID: 363329
Cite item
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Extragenital pathologies occupy a leading place in the structure of obstetric and perinatal complications. Among those are hepatobiliary diseases, which adversely affect the course and outcome of pregnancy. However, pregnancy itself is a trigger for a particular pathology, including liver and biliary tract diseases. The liver is considered the central organ of metabolic and energy homeostasis, so any change in its function is dangerous. Given that the liver is the only organ for the synthesis of albumins, fibrinogen, prothrombin, and other coagulation factors, any severe damage to its parenchyma, for example, in preeclampsia, can lead to catastrophic consequences. Possessing a multifunctional potential, the hepatobiliary system, when damaged, reacts with a wide variety of pathological processes. Therefore, it should be studied to determine pregnancy management tactics and the methods of delivery.
AIM: The aim of this study was to assess the outcomes of pregnancy and childbirth in hepatobiliary pathology associated with pregnancy and chronic non-communicable liver pathology.
METHODS: This cross-sectional multicenter study included pregnant women with or without non-communicable liver diseases. Two main groups (I and II) consisted of pregnant women with hepatobiliary pathology, associated with pregnancy and complicated by preeclampsia and liver dysfunction, as well as intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. Two comparison groups (III and IV) consisted of pregnant women with hepatic steatosis and normal pregnancy. We compared incidences of maternal and perinatal complications, as well as methods of delivery for different types of hepatopathy, with associations between diseases and outcomes being identified.
RESULTS: This study included 263 pregnant women. In the preeclampsia group, there was a high incidence of maternal and perinatal complications. In this group, the delivery period was 34.00 [31.00; 37.00] weeks; in 74% of cases, delivery was premature; in 94% of cases, operative delivery was performed; and in 28% of cases, neonatal asphyxia was diagnosed. In the groups with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy and hepatic steatosis, we also found a high rate of abdominal delivery (56 and 83%, respectively). In the group with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy, every third newborn was diagnosed with fetal growth restriction. In the hepatic steatosis group, the course of the neonatal period was complicated by hypoglycemia due to prematurity and impaired carbohydrate metabolism in the mother.
CONCLUSION: Hepatobiliary diseases adversely affect the course and outcome of pregnancy, particularly in the case of hepatopathy associated with gestation. In some cases, pregnancy itself triggers the onset of liver pathology due to the load exerted on the hepatobiliary system. The high incidence of maternal and perinatal complications associated with this condition increases the frequency of operative delivery.
About the authors
Natalia V. Zhestkova
The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O. Ott; Saint Petersburg State University
Author for correspondence.
Email: zhestkova@me.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8078-3524
SPIN-code: 6014-8153
MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)
Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg; Saint PetersburgEduard K. Ailamazyan
The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O. Ott; Saint Petersburg State University; Academician I.P. Pavlov First St. Petersburg State Medical University
Email: ailamazyan@icloud.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9848-0860
SPIN-code: 9911-1160
MD. Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor, Honored Scientist of the Russian Federation; Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg; Saint Petersburg; Saint PetersburgTatyana U. Kuzminykh
Saint Petersburg State University
Email: 9260@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6136-5324
SPIN-code: 7747-6724
Scopus Author ID: 56719818800
MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Assistant Professor
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgReferences
- Ailamazyan EK. Emergency care for extreme conditions in obstetric practice. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2015. (In Russ.)
- Shifman EM. Preeclampsia. Eclampsia. HELLP-syndrome. Petrozavodsk: IntelTek; 2002. (In Russ.)
- Galina TV, Devyatova EA,Gagaev ChG. Preeclampsia: the newest points in pathogenesis, screening and prohpylaxis. Obstetrics and gynecology. News, Opinions, Training. 2017;3(17):66–77. EDN: ZDANWB
- Yusupova ZS, Novikova VA, Olenev AS. Current conceptions of preeclampsia ― pathogenesis, diagnosis, prediction (literature review). Practical Medicine. 2018;16(6):45–51. EDN: YBTOMH
- Palicheva EI, Artymuk DA. Mechanisms of acute fatty liver pregnancy: an up-date. Mother and Baby in Kuzbass. 2018;(3):4–11. EDN: XZAOPJ
- Adamyan LV, Filippov OS, Artymuk NV, et al. Acute fatty liver of pregnancy: intensive care and obstetrical tactics. Russian Journal of Anesthesiology and Reanimatology. 2018;63(1):79–86. doi: 10.18821/0201-7563-2018-63-1-79-86 EDN: XMZJFJ
- Zhang YP, Kong WQ, Zhou SP, et al. Acute fatty liver of pregnancy: a retrospective analysis of 56 cases. Chin Med J (Engl). 2016;129(10):1208–1214. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.181963
- Westbrook RH, Dusheiko G, Williamson C. Pregnancy and liver disease. J Hepatol. 2016;64(4):933–945. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2015.11.030
- Tran TT, Ahn J, Reau NS. ACG clinical guideline: liver disease and pregnancy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2016;111(2):176–196. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2015.430 EDN: XZXOEP
- Maev IV, Andreev DN, Dicheva DT, et al. Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: state-of-the-art. Clinical medicine (Russian Jornal). 2015;93(6):25–30. EDN: TVXTMF
- Uspenskaya YuB, Sheptulin AA, Kuznetsova IV, et al. Risk factors for adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnant women. Gynecology. 2018;20(1):57–61. doi: 10.26442/2079-5696_20.1.57-61 EDN: YTZPGC
- Bik-Mukhametova YaI, Zakharenkova TN. Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy with adverse perinatal outcomes. Health and ecology issues. 2019;(4):78–84. EDN: DIBNJP
- Saitova LF, Kalimullina DKh, Idiyatullina ET, et al. Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. Bashkortostan Medical Journal. 2015;10(6):80–83. EDN: VTKMHP
- Brouwers L, Koster MP, Page-Christiaens GC, et al. Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: maternal and fetal outcomes associated with elevated bile acid levels. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212(1):100.e1–100.e1007. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.07.026
- Seliverstov PV. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: from theory to practice. The Russian Archives of Internal Medicine. 2015;(1):19–26. (In Russ.) doi: 10.20514/2226-6704-2015-0-1-19-26 EDN: TOKTJX
- Komshilova KA, Troshina EA. Obesity and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease personalized approaches to metabolic risks correction. Medical Council. 2018;(6):132–136. doi: 10.21518/2079-701X-2018-6-132-136 EDN: YVEXYH
- Makarov IO, Borovkov EI, Kazakov RD. Prevalence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease among obese pregnant women. Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproduction. 2012;6(4):18–21. EDN: PWOWND.
- Edmison J, McCullough AJ. Pathogenesis of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: human data. Clin Liver Dis. 2007;11(1):75–ix. doi: 10.1016/j.cld.2007.02.011
- Vovk EI. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: from research success to clinical algorithms. Medical Council. 2013;(10):46–51. doi: 10.21518/2079-701X-2013-10-46-51 EDN: RVFZGF
Supplementary files

