Surgical aspects of peritoneal dialysis
- Authors: Ilyin I.A.1,2, Belskikh A.N.1, Gurevich K.Y.1, Zakharov M.V.1, Pyatchenkov M.O.1
-
Affiliations:
- Military Medical Academy
- Ulyanovsk regional clinical center of specialized types of medical care named after E.M. Chuchkalov
- Issue: Vol 42, No 3 (2023)
- Pages: 267-276
- Section: Reviews
- URL: https://ogarev-online.ru/RMMArep/article/view/264765
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/rmmar567764
- ID: 264765
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Modern replacement kidney therapy belongs to a life-saving type of medical aid and includes dialysis and kidney transplantation. In the world’s nephrological practice integrated approach is preferable: the treatment starts with peritoneal dialysis as the most physiological method and later kidney transplantation or hemodialysis. Well-functioning peritoneal access is a key factor of successful peritoneal dialysis. Studies have shown that peritoneal dialysis, compared with hemodialysis, especially when performed in a dialysis center (not at home), has some clinical advantages. In particular, this treatment better preserves residual kidney function, better corrects anemia, avoids the need for vascular access, which in turn reduces the risk of access-related infectious complications, which in turn are the main cause of hospitalization and mortality among patients with end-stage renal disease. This review is focused on catheters for peritoneal dialysis access and methods of their placement. Malpractice of implantation technique can lead to unwanted consequences ranging from cuff extrusion and catheter migration to total loss of the latter. Following implantation technique by surgeons helps to avoid malpractice and improve the results. Implantation of a peritoneal catheter is an important component of peritoneal dialysis, which determines the quality of treatment, the development of non-infectious and infectious complications of peritoneal dialysis, and the duration of peritoneal dialysis therapy. A number of methods for implanting peritoneal catheters have been proposed in the world. All of them have the right to exist, each has its own advantages and disadvantages. When choosing a method, the surgeon is guided by the objective data of the patient, the patient’s ability to endure more invasive interventions (duration, anesthesia, volume of surgery), the capabilities of the surgical department, experience and qualifications. Expansion of indications for the use of the peritoneal dialysis technique, its complications, as well as concomitant diseases should determine the optimal method for implanting a peritoneal dialysis catheter for a given patient. It should be noted that to date, sufficient data have not been obtained on the effect of the method of peritoneal catheter implantation on the expansion of indications for peritoneal dialysis, the incidence of complications, and the need for additional surgical interventions.
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Ilya A. Ilyin
Military Medical Academy; Ulyanovsk regional clinical center of specialized types of medical care named after E.M. Chuchkalov
Email: tram119@yandex.ru
postgraduate student of the Department of Nephrology and Efferent Therapy, Surgeon of the Surgical Department
Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg; UlyanovskAndrey N. Belskikh
Military Medical Academy
Email: d0c62@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0421-3797
Corresponding Member of RAS, M.D., D.Sc. (Medicine), the Head of the Nephrology and Efferent Therapy Department
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgKonstantin Ya. Gurevich
Military Medical Academy
Email: kongur@mail.ru
M.D., D.Sc. (Medicine), Professor, Professor of the Nephrology and Blood Purification Department
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgMikhail V. Zakharov
Military Medical Academy
Email: zamivlad@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6549-3991
SPIN-code: 4732-9877
M.D., Ph.D. (Medicine), Professor of the Military Anesthesiology and Resuscitation Department
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgMikhail O. Pyatchenkov
Military Medical Academy
Author for correspondence.
Email: pyatchenkovMD@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5893-3191
SPIN-code: 5572-8891
M.D., Ph.D. (Medicine)
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgReferences
- National Kidney Foundation. K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for peritoneal dialysis adequacy, 2000. Am J Kidney Dis 2001;37 (Suppl 1):S65–136.
- Brandt ML, Brewer ED. Peritoneal catheter placement in children. In: Nissenson A, Fine RN, eds. Handbook of dialysis therapy, Saunders. Philadelphia: Elsevier Inc.; 2008. P. 1295–1301.
- Tokgoz B. Clinical advantages of peritoneal dialysis. Perit Dial Int. 2009;29(Suppl 2): S59–S61.
- Pastan S, Soucie JM, McClellan WM. Vascular access and increased risk of death among hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int. 2002;62:620–626.
- Kutner NG, Zhang R, Barnhart H, et al. Health status and quality of life reported by incident patients after 1 year on haemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2005;20:2159–2167.
- Mehrotra R, Chiu YW, Kalantar-Zadeh K, et al. Similar outcomes with hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis in patients with end-stage renal disease. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171:110–118.
- Bircan HY, Kulah E. Effects of a Novel Peritoneal Dialysis: The Open Versus Laparoscopic Preperitoneal Tunneling Technique. Ther Apher Dial. 2016;20(1):66–72.
- Daugirdas JT, Blake PG, Todd S. Handbook of dialysis. 5th edition. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer Health; 2015.
- Crabtree JH. Clinical biodurability of aliphatic polyether based polyurehanes as peritoneal dialysis catheters. ASAIO J. 2003;49(3):290–294.
- Andrusev AM. Peritoneal dialysis: a brief historical review. Nephrology and dialysis. 2010;12(1):54–58. (In Russ.)
- Hagen SM, Lafranca JA, Ijzermans JN, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the influence of peritoneal dialysis catheter type on complication rate and catheter survival. Kidney Int. 2014;85:920–932.
- Xie J, Kiryluk K, Ren H, et al. Coiled versus straight peritoneal dialysis catheters: a randomized controlled trial and metaanalysis. Am J Kidney Dis. 2011; 58:946–955.
- Vychytil A, Lorenz M, Schneider B, et al. Newstrategies to prevent Staphylococcus aureus infections in peritoneal dialysis patients. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1998;9:669–676.
- Crabtree JH, Burchette RJ, Siddiqi NA. Optimal peritoneal dialysis catheter type and exit-site location: an anthropometric analysis. ASAIO J. 2005;51:743–747.
- Twardowski ZJ, Prowant BF, Nichols WK, et al. Six-year experience with swan neck presternal peritoneal dialysis catheter. Perit Dial Int 1998;18:598–602.
- Penner T, Crabtree JH. Peritoneal dialysis catheters with back exit sites. Perit Dial Int. 2013;33:93–96.
- Eriguchi M, Tsuruya K, Yoshida H, et al. Extended swan-neck catheter with upper abdominal exit site reduces peritoneal dialysis-related infections. Ther Apher Dial. 2016;20:158–164.
- Crabtree JH, Shrestha BM, Chow KM, et al. Сreating and maintaining optimal peritoneal dialysis access in the adult patient: 2019 update. Perit Dial Int. 2019;39(5):414–436. doi: 10.3747/pdi.2018.00232
- Figueiredo A, Goh BL, Jenkins S, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for peritoneal access. Perit Dial Int. 2010;30:424–429.
- Twardowski ZJ. Peritoneal catheter placement and management. In: Massry SG, Suki WN, eds. Therapy of Renal Disease and Related Disorders. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic; 1997. P. 953–979.
- Crabtree JH. Selected best demonstrated practices in peritoneal dialysis access. Kidney Int. 2006;70: S27–37.
- Crabtree JH, Burchette RJ. Prospective comparison of downward and lateral peritoneal dialysis catheter tunnel-tract and exit-site directions. Perit Dial Int. 2006;26:677–683.
- Ash SR. Chronic peritoneal dialysis catheters: overview of design, placement, and removal procedures. Semin Dial. 2003;16:323–334.
- Tenckhoff H, Schechter H. A bacteriologically safe peritoneal access device. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs. 1968;14:181–187.
- Abdel-Aal AK, Dybbro P, Hathaway P, et al. Best practices consensus protocol for peritoneal dialysis catheter placement by interventional radiologists. Perit Dial Int. 2014;34:481–493.
- Gadallah MF, Ramdeen G, Mignone J, et al. Role of preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis in preventing postoperative peritonitis in newly placed peritoneal dialysis catheters. Am J Kidney Dis. 2000;36: 1014–1019.
- Sreenarasimhaiah VP, Margassery SK, Martin KJ, et al. Percutaneous technique of presternal peritoneal dialysis catheter placement. Semin Dial. 2004; 17:407–410.
- Brewer TE, Caldwell FT, Patterson RM, et al. Indwelling peritoneal (Tenckhoff) dialysis catheter. Experience with 24 patients. JAMA. 1972;219:1011–1015.
- Helfrich GB, Winchester JF. What is the best technique for implantation of a peritoneal dialysis catheter? Perit Dial Bull. 1982;2:132–133.
- Yang YF, Wang HJ, Yeh CC, et al. Early initiation of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis in patients undergoing surgical implantation of Tenckhoff catheters. Perit Dial Int. 2011;31:551–557.
- Dupont V, Kanagaratnam L, Sigogne M, et al. Outcome of polycystic kidney disease patients on peritoneal dialysis: systemic review of literature and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2018;13(5):e0196769.
- Juergensen PH, Rizvi H, Caride VJ, et al. Value of scintigraphy in chronic peritoneal dialysis patients. Kidney Int. 1999;55: 1111–1119.
- Ash SR. Placement of the Tenckhoff peritoneal dialysis catheter under peritoneoscopic visualization. Dial Transplant. 1981;10:82–86.
- Ash SR, Wolf GC, Bloch R. Placement of the Tenckhoff peritoneal dialysis catheter under peritoneoscopic visualization. Dial Transplant. 1981;10:383–385.
- Watson DI, Paterson D, Bannister K. Secure placement of peritoneal dialysis catheters using a laparoscopic technique. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1996;6(1):35–37.
- Shrestha BM, Shrestha D, Kumar A, et al. Advanced laparoscopic peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion: systematic review and meta-analysis. Perit Dial Int. 2018; 38(3):163–171. doi: 10.3747/pdi.2017.00230
- van Laanen JH, Cornelis T, Mees BM, et al. Randomized controlled trial comparing open versus laparoscopic placement of a peritoneal dialysis catheter and outcomes: the CAPD I trial. Perit Dial Int. 2018;38(2):104–112. doi: 10.3747/pdi.2017.00023
- Mohamed A, Bennett M, Gomez L, et al. Laparoscopic peritoneal dialysis surgery is safe and effective in patients with prior abdominal surgery. Ann Vasc Surg. 2018;53:133–138.
- Ogunc G. Minilaparoscopic extraperitoneal tunneling with omentopexy: a new technique for CAPD catheter placement. Perit Dial Int. 2005;25:551–555.
- Crabtree JH, Burchette RJ. Peritoneal dialysis catheter embedment: surgical considerations, expectations, and complications. Am J Surg. 2013;206:464–71.
- Riara S, Abdulhadi M, Day C, Prasad B. Accidental insertion of a peritoneal dialysis catheter in the urinary bladder. Case Rep Nephrol Dial. 2018;8:76–81.
- Debowski JA, Wærp C, Kjellevold SA, et al. Cuff extrusion in peritoneal dialysis: single-centre experience with cuff-shaving procedure in five patients over a 4-year period. Clin Kidney J. 2017;10:131–134.
- Chow KM, Li PK, Cho Y, et al. ISPD Catheter-related Infection Recommendations: 2023 Update. Perit Dial Int. 2023;43(3):201–219. doi: 10.1177/08968608231172740
- Cheetham MS, Zhao J, McCullough K, et al. International peritoneal dialysis training practices and the risk of peritonitis. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2022;37(5): 937–949.
- Kang SH, Cho KH, Kim AY, et al. Catheter salvage using revision for a peritoneal dialysis catheter with intractable exit site and/or tunnel infections. Semin Dial. 2022;36(1):53–56.
- Manera KE, Johnson DW, Craig JC, et al. Establishing a core outcome set for peritoneal dialysis: report of the SONG-PD (Standardized Outcomes in Nephrology-Peritoneal Dialysis) consensus workshop. Am J Kidney Dis. 2020;75(3):404–412.
- Li PK, Chow KM, Cho Y, et al. ISPD peritonitis guideline recommendations: 2022 update on prevention and treatment. Perit Dial Int. 2022;42(2):110–153.
- Cheetham MS, Zhao J, McCullough K, et al. International peritoneal dialysis training practices and the risk of peritonitis. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2022;37(5): 937–949.
- Li R, Zhang D, He J, et al. Characteristics analysis, clinical outcome and risk factors for fungal peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis patients: a 10-year case-control study. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021;8:774946.
- Crabtree JH, Siddiqi RA. Simultaneous catheter replacement for infectious and mechanical complications without interruption of peritoneal dialysis. Perit Dial Int. 2016;36:182–187.
- Diaz-Buxo JA, Gewissinger WT. Single-cuff versus double-cuff Tenckhoff catheter. Perit Dial Bull. 1984;4(Suppl):S100–102.
- Leblanc M, Ouimet D, Pichette V. Dialysate leaks in peritoneal dialysis. Semin Dial. 2001;14:50–54.
- Bargman JM. Complications of peritoneal dialysis related to increase intraabdominal pressure. Kidney Int. 1993;43: S75–80.
- Crabtree JH. Rescue and salvage procedures for mechanical and infectious complications of peritoneal dialysis. Int J Artif Organs. 2006;29:67–84.
- Vijt D, Castro MJ, Endall G, et al. Post insertion catheter care in peritoneal dialysis (PD) centres across Europe — Part 2: complication rates and individual patient outcomes. EDTNA ERCA J. 2004;30:91–96.
Supplementary files
