Rhetorical techniques as means of audience influence in African political discourse (based on the example of Ahoua Don Mello's speech)

Cover Page

Cite item

Abstract

this article examines rhetorical devices as means of audience influence in the context of African political discourse. All of them reflect the connection between language and politics, where language acts as an instrument of supremacy and power. In this regard, the study of the political language is justified, since it is precisely rhetorical devices that can act as catalysts for functional and linguistic impact on the addressee. The analysis of Ahua Don Mello's political speech is carried out in order to obtain a comprehensive understanding of the use range of rhetorical devices in it in the context of the systemic-functional approach developed by M.A.K. Halliday. The correlation between the identified rhetorical techniques and the implementation of the three main functions of the language (conceptual, interpersonal, textual) in political discourse is described. Historical allusions, metaphors, positively emotionally charged vocabulary and cultural codes that contribute to the formation of ideological attitudes are aimed at persuading, mobilizing, and forming the national identity of the African people.

About the authors

Yu. N Khristich

Prince Alexander Nevsky Military University of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation

References

  1. Аристотель. Риторика // Сб. Античные риторики. М.: Изд-во Московского университета, 1978. 352 с.
  2. Ван Дейк Т. Дискурс и власть: Репрезентация доминирования в языке и коммуникации. М.: Книжный дом «Либроком», 2013. 344 с.
  3. Джейсон Э. Джонс, Дж. С. Печчи. Язык и политика // Электронный ресурс. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/author/Jason-E.-Jones/2110258942 (дата обращения: 15.08.2025)
  4. Михальская А.К. Основы риторики: Мысль и слово. М.: Просвещение, 1996. 416 с.
  5. Холлидей М.А.К. Лингвистическая функция и литературный стиль // Новое в зарубежной лингвистике. Вып. IX. Лингвостилистика. М.: Прогресс, 1980. С. 116 – 147.
  6. Gill A.M., Whedbee K.R. Rhetoric. Discourse as Structure and Social Process. London: Sage, 1997. 157 p.
  7. Pernot L. La rh?torique dans l’antiquit?. Le livre de poche, Librairie G?n?rale Fran?aise, 2000. 351 p.
  8. P?cheux Michel. Sur la (d?)construction des th?ories linguistiques // DRLAV. 1982. № 27. P. 1 – 24.
  9. Shapiro M.J. Language and Political Understanding. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1981. 253 p.
  10. Coop?rer avec la Russie, c’est changer de ma?tre, Ahoua Don Mello r?pond. URL: https://www.linfodrome.com/politique/112014-cooperer-avec-la-russie-c-est-changer-de-maitre-ahoua-don-mello-repond (дата обращения: 10.08.2025)

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).