A New Trick for the Old Debate

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

In the end of the 20th century analytic philosophy of religion has formed a new course for the debate about the existence of God, which is concerned with the problem of the divine hiddenness. The paper addresses the historical context of the origin of the new course. It shows how its originator John Schellenberg was able to formulate his Hiddenness Argument using the contemporary achievements in epistemology. In addition, the paper brings out Schellenberg’snovel approach to defense of plausibility of the Argument’spremises. Finally, it suggests promising directions for debating the Hiddenness Argument.

About the authors

Pavel A. Butakov

Institute of Philosophy and Law SB RAS

Email: pavelbutakov@academ.org
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8133-1626
Candidate of Philosophy, Senior Research fellow Novosibirsk

References

  1. Бутаков, П. А. (2018). Философская теология до и после Плантинги. Вестник Томского гос. ун-та. Философия. Социология. Политология. № 46. С. 183-192. doi: 10.17223/1998863X/46/21 Butakov, P. A. (2018). Philosophical Theology before and after Plantinga. Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. no. 46. pp. 183-192. (In Russ.) doi: 10.17223/1998863X/46/21
  2. Шелленберг, Дж. Л. (2020). Сокрытость Бога и разум человека. Пер. с англ. и вступ. ст. П. А. Бутаков. М., Академический проект. [В печати]. (In Russ.) Schellenberg, J. L. (2020). The hiddenness of God and the mind of man. Moscow. Academic project. [In Print]. (In Russ.)
  3. Bozzo, A. (2019). The Pre-eminent Good Argument. Religious Studies. pp. 1-15. [In Print]. doi: 10.1017/S0034412518000914
  4. Cohen, L. J. (1989). Belief and Acceptance. Mind, no. 98(391). pp. 367-389. doi: 10.1093/mind/XCVIII.391.367
  5. Cullison, A. (2010). Two Solutions to the Problem of Divine Hiddenness. American Philosophical Quarterly. no. 47. pp. 119-134. doi: 10.2307/40606890
  6. Draper, P. (2002). Seeking but Not Believing: Confessions of a Practicing Agnostic. In Howard-Snyder, D. and Moser, P. (eds.) Divine Hiddenness: New Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 197-214.
  7. Howard-Snyder, D. (2015). Divine Openness and Creaturely Nonresistant Nonbelief. In Green, A., Stump, E. (eds.) Hidden Divinity and Religious Belief: New Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 126-138.
  8. Schellenberg, J. L. (1993). Divine Hiddenness and Human Reason. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  9. Schellenberg, J. L (2015a). Divine Hiddenness and Human Philosophy. In Green, A. and Stump, E. (eds.) Hidden Divinity and Religious Belief: New Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 13-32.
  10. Schellenberg, J. L. (2015b). The Hiddenness Argument: Philosophy’s New Challenge to Belief in God. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  11. Schellenberg, J. L. (2019). Is Plantinga-Style Christian Philosophy Really Philosophy? In Simmons, J.A. (ed.) Christian Philosophy: Conceptions, Continuations, and Challenges. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 229-243.
  12. Swinburne, R. (1998). Providence and the Problem of Evil. N.Y., Oxford University Press.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).