Resource-environment joint forecasting using big data mining and 3D/4D modeling in Luanchuan mining district, China

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The Fourth generation industrial age and 5G + intelligent communication in the "Fourth Paradigm of Science" in the 21st century provide a new opportunity for research on the relationship between mining development and environmental protection. This paper is based on the theory of metallogenic geodynamics background, metallogenic process and quantitative evaluation and chooses the Luanchuan district as a case study, using deep-level artificial intelligence mining and three/four-dimensional (3D/4D) multi-disciplinary, multi-parameter and multi-scale modeling technology platform of geoscience big data (including multi-dimensional and multi-scale geological, geophysical, geochemical, hyperspectral and highresolution remote sensing (multi-temporal) and real-time mining data), carrying out the construction of 3D geological model, metallogenic process model and quantitative exploration model from district to deposit scales and the quantitative prediction and evaluation of the regional Mo polymetallic mineral resources, the aim is to realize the dynamic evaluation of highprecision 3D geological (rock, structure, hydrology, soil, etc.) environment protection and comprehensive development and utilization of mineral resources in digital and wisdom mines, it provides scientific information for the sustainable development of mineral resources and mine environment in the study area. The research results are summarized as follows: (1) The geoscience big data related to mineral resource prediction and evaluation of district include mining data such as 3D geological modeling, geophysics interpretation, geochemistry, and remote sensing modeling, which are combined with GeoCube3.0 software. The optimization of deep targets and comprehensive evaluation of mineral resources in Luanchuan district (500 km2, 2.5 km deep) have been realized, including 6.5 million tons of Mo, 1.5 million tons of W, and 5 million tons of Pb-Zn-Ag. (2) The 3D geological modeling of geology, mineral deposit, and exploration targeting is related to the mine environment. The data of exploration and mining in the pits of Nannihu – Sandaozhuang – Shangfang deposits and the deep channels of Luotuoshan and Xigou deposits show a poor spatial correlation between the NW-trending porphyryskarn deposits and the ore bodies. The NE-trending faults are usually tensional or tensional-torsional structures formed in the post-metallogenic period, which is the migration pathway of hydrothermal fluid of the related Pb-Zn deposit. There is a risk of groundwater pollution in the high-altitude Pb-Zn mining zones, such as the Lengshui and Bailugou deposits controlled by NE-trending faults are developed outside of porphyry-skarn types of Mo (W) deposits in the Luanchuan area. (3) Construction of mineral resources and environmental assessment and decision-making in intelligent digital mines: 3D geological model is established in large mines and associated with ancient mining caves, pit, and deep roadway engineering in the mining areas to realize reasonable orientation and sustainable development of mining industry. The hyperspectral database is used to construct three-dimensional useful and harmful element models to realize the association of exploration, mining, and mineral processing mineralogy for the recovery of harmful elements (As, Sb, Hg, etc.). 0.5 m resolution Worldview2 images are used to identify the distribution of Fe in the wastewater and slag slurry of important tailings reservoirs, so as to protect surface runoff and soil pollution.

About the authors

Gongwen Wang

China University of Geosciences

Email: gwwang@cugb.edu.cn

Shouting Zhang

China University of Geosciences

Changhai Yan

Key Laboratory of Metallogenetic Processes and Resource Utilization

Zhenshan Pang

China Geological Survey

Hongwei Wang

Luanchuan County Natural Resources Bureau

Zhankui Feng

Henan Jiuzhou Zhongding Mining Co., Ltd.

Hong Dong

China Geology & Mining Co., Ltd.

Hongtao Cheng

Henan Zhongxin Mining Co., Ltd.

Yaqing He

Henan China Molybdenum Co., Ltd.

Ruixi Li

China University of Geosciences

Zhiqiang Zhang

China Geological Survey

Leilei Huang

China University of Geosciences

Nana Guo

Luanchuan County Natural Resources Bureau

References

  1. Zhao P. Quantitative geoscience methods and applications. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2004.
  2. Ye T., Lv Z., Pang Z., et al. Theory and method of prospecting prediction in exploration area. Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 2014. 568 p.
  3. Mo X., Dong G., Deng J., et al. Metallogenic dynamic background of large super large deposits. Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 2020. 487 p.
  4. Zhai Y., Liu J., Xue C., et al. Metallogenic process and mechanism of large super large deposits. Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 2020. 428 p.
  5. Zhao P., Chen Y., Zhang S., et al. Quantitative evaluation of large super large deposits. Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 2020. 388 p.
  6. Wang G., Zhang S., Chen J., et al. Technical manual for quantitative evaluation of large super large deposits. Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 2019. 175 p.
  7. Zhao P. Digital prospecting and quantitative evaluation in the era of big data // Geological Bulletin of China. 2015. Vol. 34. Iss. 7. P. 1255–1259.
  8. Xiao K., Sun L., Li N., Wang K., Fan J., Ding J. Mineral resources assessment under the thought of big data // Geological Bulletin of China. 2015. Vol. 34. Iss. 7. P. 1266– 1272.
  9. Guo H. A project on big Earth data science engineering // Bulletin of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. 2018. Vol. 33. Iss. 8. P. 818–824. https://doi.org/10.16418/j.issn.1000-3045.2018.08.008.
  10. Zhou Y., Chen S., Zhang Q., Xiao F., Wang S., Liu Y., et al. Advances and prospects of big data and mathematical geoscience // Acta Petrologica Sinica. 2018. Vol. 34. Iss. 2. P. 255–263.
  11. Wu C., Liu G. Big data and future development of geology // Geological Bulletin of China. 2019. Vol. 38. Iss. 7. P. 1081–1088.
  12. Zhao P. Characteristics of geological big data and its rational development and utilization // Earth Science Frontiers. 2019. Vol. 26. Iss. 4. P. 1–5.
  13. Huang L. High precision 3D geological modeling and evaluation of Wunugetushan mine in Inner Mongolia. Beijing: China University of Geosciences (Beijing), 2020.
  14. Wang G., Zhang Z., Li R., Li J., Sha D., Zeng Q., et al. Resource prediction and assessment based on 3D/4D big data modeling and deep integration in key ore districts of North China // Science China Earth Sciences. 2021. Vol. 64. P. 1590–1606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-020-9791-4.
  15. Wang G., Ma Z., Li R., Song Y., Qu J., Zhang S., et al. Integration of multi-source and multi-scale datasets for 3D structural modeling for subsurface exploration targeting, Luanchuan Mo-polymetallic district, China // Journal of Applied Geophysics. 2017. Vol. 139. P. 269–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2017.02.027.
  16. Buttgereit D., Benndorf J., Buxton M. W. N. Realtime mining: grade monitoring und control cockpit // AKIDA 2016. 2016. P. 49–60.
  17. Wambeke T., Benndorf J. A simulation-based geostatistical approach to real-time reconciliation of the grade control model // Mathematical Geosciences. 2017. Vol. 49. Iss. 1. P. 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-016-9658-6.
  18. Ailleres L., Grose L., Laurent G., Armit R., Jessell M., Caumon G., et al. LOOP: a new open source platform for 3D geo-structural simulations // Three-dimensional geological mapping: workshop extended abstracts. Champaign: Illinois State Geological Survey, 2018. P. 14–18.
  19. Kreuzer O. P., Yousefi M., Nykänen V. Introduction to the special issue on spatial modelling and analysis of ore-forming processes in mineral exploration targeting // Ore Geology Reviews. 2020. Vol. 119. Iss. 3. P. 103391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2020.103391.
  20. Pár W. 3D, 4D and predictive modelling of major mineral belts in Europe. Cham: Springer, 2015. 331 p.
  21. Wang G., Zhang S., Yan C., Song Y., Ma Z., Li D. 3D geological modeling of Luanchuan molybdenum polymetallic mining area based on geological and gravity and magnetic data integration // Earth Science – Journal of China University of Geosciences. 2011. Vol. 36. Iss. 2. P. 266–360.
  22. Ma Z., Yan C., Song Y., et al. Application of CSAMT and sip geophysical prospecting combination method in the exploration of concealed metal deposits in Luanchuan mountain area, Henan Province // Geology and Exploration. 2011. Vol. 47. Iss. 4. P. 654–662.
  23. Wang G., Li R., Carranza E. J. M., Zhang S., Yan C., Zhu Y., et al. 3D geological modeling for prediction of subsurface Mo targets in the Luanchuan district, China // Ore Geology Reviews. 2015. Vol. 71. P. 592–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2015.03.002.
  24. Wang G., Pang Z., Boisvert J. B., Hao Y., Cao Y., Qu J. Quantitative assessment of mineral resources by combining geostatistics and fractal methods in the Tongshan porphyry Cu deposit (China) // Journal of Geochemical Exploration. 2013. Vol. 134. P. 85–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gexplo.2013.08.004.
  25. Wang G., Zhang S., Yan C., Song Y., Sun Y., Li D., et al. Mineral potential targeting and resource assessment based on 3D geological modeling in Luanchuan region, China // Computers & Geosciences. 2011. Vol. 37. Iss. 12. P. 1976–1988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2011.05.007.
  26. Wang G., Zhang S., Yan C., Xu G., Ma M., Li K., et al. Application of the multifractal singular value decomposition for delineating geophysical anomalies associated with molybdenum occurrences in the Luanchuan ore field (China) // Journal of Applied Geophysics. 2012. Vol. 86. P. 109–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2012.07.013.
  27. Zhang Z., Wang G., Ma Z., Carranza E. J. M., Jia W., Du J., et al. Batholith-stock scale exploration targeting based on multi-source geological and geophysical datasets in the Luanchuan Mo polymetallic district, China // Ore Geology Reviews. 2020. Vol. 118. P. 103225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2019.103225.
  28. Zhang Z., Wang G., Ma Z., Gong X. Interactive 3D modeling by integration of geoscience datasets for exploration targeting in Luanchuan Mo polymetallic district, China // Natural Resources Research. 2018. Vol. 27. P. 315–346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-017-9353-4.
  29. Zhang Z., Zhang J., Wang G., Carranza E. J. M., Pang Z., Wang H. From 2D to 3D modeling of mineral prospectivity using multi-source geoscience datasets, Wulong gold district, China // Natural Resources Research. 2020. Vol. 29. Iss. 1. P. 345–364. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-020-09614-6.
  30. Li R., Wang G., Carranza E. J. M. GeoCube: a 3D mineral resources quantitative prediction and assessment system // Computers & Geosciences. 2016. Vol. 89. P. 161–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2016.01.012.
  31. Agterberg F. P., Bonham-Carter G. F., Cheng Q., Wright D. F. Weights of evidence modeling and weighted logistic regression for mineral potential mapping // Computers in geology – 25 years of progress. New York: Oxford University Press. 1993. P. 13–32.
  32. Cheng Q., Agterberg F. P., Ballantyne S. B. The separation of geochemical anomalies from background by fractal methods // Journal of Geochemical Exploration. 1994. Vol. 51. Iss. 2. P. 109–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-6742(94)90013-2.
  33. Turcotte D. L. Fractals and chaos in geology and geophysics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997. 416 p.
  34. Pan G., Harris D. P. Information synthesis for mineral exploration. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000. 450 p.
  35. Afzal P., Alghalandis Y. F., Khakzad A., Moarefvand P., Omran N. R. Delineation of mineralization zones in porphyry Cu deposits by fractal concentration-volume modeling // Journal of Geochemical Exploration. 2011. Vol. 108. Iss. 3. P. 220–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gexplo.2011.03.005.
  36. Carranza E. J. M. Geocomputation of mineral exploration targets // Computers & Geosciences. 2011. Vol. 37. Iss. 12. P. 1907–1916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2011.11.009.
  37. Calcagno P., Chilès J. P., Courrioux G., Guillen A. Geological modelling from field data and geological knowledge: Part I. Modelling method coupling 3D potentialfield interpolation and geological rules // Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors. 2008. Vol. 171. Iss. 1-4. P. 147–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2008.06.013.
  38. Caumon G., Collon-Drouaillet P., de Veslud C. L. C, Viseur S., Sausse J. Surface-based 3D modeling of geological structures // Mathematical Geosciences. 2009. Vol. 41. Iss. 8. P. 927–945. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-009-9244-2.
  39. Fallara F., Legault M., Rabeau O. 3-D integrated geological modeling in the Abitibi Subprovince (Québec, Canada): techniques and applications // Exploration & Mining Geology. 2006. Vol. 15. Iss. 1-2. P. 27–43. https://doi.org/10.2113/gsemg.15.1-2.27.
  40. Graham G. E., Kokaly R. F., Kelley K. D., Hoefen T. M., Johnson M. R., Hubbard B. E. Application of imaging spectroscopy for mineral exploration in Alaska: a study over porphyry Cu deposits in the eastern Alaska Range // Economic Geology. 2018. Vol. 113. Iss. 2. P. 489–510. https://doi.org/10.5382/econgeo.2018.4559.
  41. Houlding S. W. 3D geoscience modeling: computer techniques for geological characterization. Berlin: SpringerVerlag Berlin Heidelberg, 1994. 311 p.
  42. Mallet J. L. Discrete smooth interpolation in geometric modelling // Computer-Aided Design. 1992. Vol. 24. Iss. 4. P. 178–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4485(92)90054-E.
  43. Mallet J. L. GOCAD: a computer aided design program for geological applications // Three-dimensional modeling with geoscientific information systems / ed. A.K. Turner. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1992. P. 123–142.
  44. Mallet J. L. Discrete modeling for natural objects // Mathematical Geology. 1997. Vol. 29. Iss. 2. P. 199–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02769628.
  45. Mallet J. L. Geomodeling. New York: Oxford University Press, 2002. 624 p.
  46. Jackson R. G. Application of 3D geochemistry to mineral exploration // Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis. 2010. Vol. 10. Iss. 2. P. 143–156. https://doi.org/10.1144/1467-7873/09-217.
  47. Kaufmann O., Martin T. 3D geological modelling from boreholes, cross-sections and geological maps, application over former natural gas storages in coal mines // Computers & Geosciences. 2008. Vol. 34. Iss. 3. P. 278– 290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2007.09.005.
  48. Leite E. P., de Souza Filho C. R. Probabilistic neural networks applied to mineral potential mapping for platinum group elements in the Serra Leste region, Carajás Mineral Province, Brazil // Computers & Geosciences. 2009. Vol. 35. Iss. 3. P. 675–687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2008.05.003.
  49. Lindsay M. D., Ailléres L., Jessell M. W., de Kemp E. A., Betts P. G. Locating and quantifying geological uncertainty in three-dimensional models: analysis of the Gippsland Basin, southeastern Australia // Tectonophysics. 2012. Vol. 546-547. P. 10–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2012.04.007.
  50. Pollock D. W., Barron O. V., Donn M. J. 3D exploratory analysis of descriptive lithology records using regular expressions // Computers & Geosciences. 2012. Vol. 39. P. 111–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2011.06.018.
  51. Sprague K., de Kemp E., Wong W., McGaughey J., Perron G., Barrie T. Spatial targeting using queries in a 3-D GIS environment with application to mineral exploration // Computers & Geosciences. 2006. Vol. 32. Iss. 3. P. 396–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2005.07.008.
  52. Zanchi A., Francesca S., Stefano Z., Simone S., Graziano G. 3D reconstruction of complex geological bodies: examples from the Alps // Computers & Geosciences. 2009. Vol. 35. Iss. 1. P. 49–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2007.09.003.
  53. Han J., Yun H., Hu H., et al. Characteristics and resource prediction of deep tungsten molybdenum ore bodies in Luanchuan ore concentration area, Henan Province // Metal Mines. 2020. Vol. 533. Iss. 11. P. 141–151.
  54. Jia H., Liu J., Yin X., Wang C., Geng H., Chi H., et al. Study on mine geological environment assessment in Tongling pyrite concentrated mining area, Anhui // Geoscience Frontier. 2021. Vol. 84. Iss. 4. P. 131–141. https://doi.org/10.13745/j.esf.sf.2020.10.16.
  55. He Y., Du H., Peng F. Application of disaster monitoring and early warning in open-pit and underground rock mass engineering of Sandaozhuang mine // Nonferrous Geology. 2017. Vol. 69. Iss. 4. P. 81–85.
  56. Cao H., Zhang S., Santosh M., Zheng L., Tang L., Li D., et al. The Luanchuan Mo-W-Pb-Zn-Ag magmatic-hydrothermal system in the East Qinling metallogenic belt, China: constrains on metallogenesis from C-H-O-S-Pb isotope compositions and Rb-Sr isochron ages // Journal of Asian Earth Sciences. 2015. Vol. 111. P. 751–780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2015.06.005.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Согласие на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика»

1. Я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных»), осуществляя использование сайта https://journals.rcsi.science/ (далее – «Сайт»), подтверждая свою полную дееспособность даю согласие на обработку персональных данных с использованием средств автоматизации Оператору - федеральному государственному бюджетному учреждению «Российский центр научной информации» (РЦНИ), далее – «Оператор», расположенному по адресу: 119991, г. Москва, Ленинский просп., д.32А, со следующими условиями.

2. Категории обрабатываемых данных: файлы «cookies» (куки-файлы). Файлы «cookie» – это небольшой текстовый файл, который веб-сервер может хранить в браузере Пользователя. Данные файлы веб-сервер загружает на устройство Пользователя при посещении им Сайта. При каждом следующем посещении Пользователем Сайта «cookie» файлы отправляются на Сайт Оператора. Данные файлы позволяют Сайту распознавать устройство Пользователя. Содержимое такого файла может как относиться, так и не относиться к персональным данным, в зависимости от того, содержит ли такой файл персональные данные или содержит обезличенные технические данные.

3. Цель обработки персональных данных: анализ пользовательской активности с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика».

4. Категории субъектов персональных данных: все Пользователи Сайта, которые дали согласие на обработку файлов «cookie».

5. Способы обработки: сбор, запись, систематизация, накопление, хранение, уточнение (обновление, изменение), извлечение, использование, передача (доступ, предоставление), блокирование, удаление, уничтожение персональных данных.

6. Срок обработки и хранения: до получения от Субъекта персональных данных требования о прекращении обработки/отзыва согласия.

7. Способ отзыва: заявление об отзыве в письменном виде путём его направления на адрес электронной почты Оператора: info@rcsi.science или путем письменного обращения по юридическому адресу: 119991, г. Москва, Ленинский просп., д.32А

8. Субъект персональных данных вправе запретить своему оборудованию прием этих данных или ограничить прием этих данных. При отказе от получения таких данных или при ограничении приема данных некоторые функции Сайта могут работать некорректно. Субъект персональных данных обязуется сам настроить свое оборудование таким способом, чтобы оно обеспечивало адекватный его желаниям режим работы и уровень защиты данных файлов «cookie», Оператор не предоставляет технологических и правовых консультаций на темы подобного характера.

9. Порядок уничтожения персональных данных при достижении цели их обработки или при наступлении иных законных оснований определяется Оператором в соответствии с законодательством Российской Федерации.

10. Я согласен/согласна квалифицировать в качестве своей простой электронной подписи под настоящим Согласием и под Политикой обработки персональных данных выполнение мною следующего действия на сайте: https://journals.rcsi.science/ нажатие мною на интерфейсе с текстом: «Сайт использует сервис «Яндекс.Метрика» (который использует файлы «cookie») на элемент с текстом «Принять и продолжить».