Outlines of the Science and Technology System: A Look into the Past for Forming Policy for the Development of the Next Generation Ecosystem. Part 2
- Авторлар: Aryngazin A.K.1
-
Мекемелер:
- Sustainable Innovation and Technology Foundation
- Шығарылым: Том 6, № 1 (2024)
- Беттер: 32-48
- Бөлім: Scientific policy
- URL: https://ogarev-online.ru/2686-827X/article/view/268005
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/smtp.2024.6.1.2
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/EVLVBQ
- ID: 268005
Дәйексөз келтіру
Толық мәтін
Аннотация
Shifting from the description of landscape of the science and education system presented in the first part of the work as well as from identification of some values of the governing body (all these are needed for a situational study of trends, strengths and weaknesses), in this article we examine the system in a country case to find measures to overcome its accompanying nature with respect to economy. This is manifested in the diversion of management from what researchers and developers do, what they need, where and what goals to set, how to use the results obtained in the field of science and technology for the benefit of society, economy and person. By connecting the system to key building blocks, as well as functions and values they deliver, of a much broader innovation ecosystem, we are setting its next-generation outlines on the agenda. Systematic implementation of policies is based on a long-term vision, strategy and medium-term plans in the field of science, technology and innovation. Strategic decision-making requires greater clarity of the outlines of the future as a professional, and not just a political, consensus of stakeholders. To this end, taking into account the significantly increased pace and changed mechanism of technological renewal which have an impact on competitiveness, we use the method proposed by Startup Genome for ranking startup ecosystems. This method also identifies four stages of the ecosystem life cycle: activation, globalization, attractiveness and integration. We rely on concepts, historical and current practical examples to give high-level characteristics and formulate criteria and tasks for transformation of the startup ecosystem as a part of innovation ecosystem.
Негізгі сөздер
Авторлар туралы
Askar Aryngazin
Sustainable Innovation and Technology Foundation
Email: askar.aryngazin@sitf.group
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8329-4072
Doctor of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, Director Astana, Kazakhstan
Әдебиет тізімі
- Арынгазин А. К. Контуры научно-технологической системы: взгляд в прошлое для формирования политики по развитию экосистемы следующего поколения. Часть 1 // Управление наукой: теория и практика. 2023. Т. 5, № 4. С. 27–54. doi: 10.19181/smtp.2023.5.4.2. EDN FLGKMT.
- Криворучко В. В. О ключевых мерах по дальнейшему реформированию российской науки // Управление наукой: теория и практика. 2021. Т. 3, № 4. С. 36–43. doi: 10.19181/smtp.2021.3.4.4. EDN STJWQZ.
- Клисторин В. И. Кадровые проблемы в отечественной науке // Управление наукой: теория и практика. 2023. Т. 5, № 2. С. 19–29. doi: 10.19181/smtp.2023.5.2.2. EDN ILKYBK.
- Technology at work v6.0: The coming of the post-production society / A. Pineda, I. Cesarec, J. Zhang [et al.] // Citi : [сайт]. 2021. 16 June. URL: https://citigroup.com/global/insights/citigps/technology-at-work-v6-0 (дата обращения: 28.12.2023).
- O'Mara M. The code: Silicon Valley and the remaking of America. New York : Penguin Books, 2020. 496, [16] р.
- Sull D., Homkes R., Sull C. Why strategy execution unravels – and what to do about it // Harvard Business Review. 2015. Vol. 93, № 3. Р. 57–66.
- Martin R. L. The big lie of strategic planning // Harvard Business Review. 2014. Vol. 92, № 1–2. P. 78–84.
- Martin R. L. A new way to think: Your guide to superior management effectiveness. Boston, MA : Harvard Business Review Press, 2022. ix, 231 р.
- Dalcher D. Strategy execution: Overcoming the alignment trap // Leading the project revolution: Reframing the human dynamics of successful projects. Ed. by D. Dalcher. Abingdon, Oxon : Routledge, 2019. P. 155–161.
- Atkinson R. D., McKay A. S. Digital prosperity: understanding the economic benefits of the information technology revolution // SSRN Electronic Journal. 2007. March. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1004516.
- Токмолдин С., Кнар Э. Доктрина науки Казахстана «Великий науки путь» // Информационные и телекоммуникационные сети. 2022. № 6. C. 9–48.
- Wu L., Wang D., Evans J. A. Large teams develop and small teams disrupt science and technology // Nature. 2019. Vol. 566. Р. 378–382. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-0941-9.
- Solow R. M. A contribution to the theory of economic growth // The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1956. Vol. 70, № 1. P. 65–94. doi: 10.2307/1884513.
- Балацкий Е. В., Юревич М. А. Прогнозирование эффективности российской экономики на основе научно-технологического баланса // Наука. Инновации. Образование. 2018. Т. 13, № 2. C. 54–70. EDN URMEVN.
- Лаунонен М., Виитанен Ю. Передовой мировой опыт управления инновационными экосистемами и хабами / пер. с англ. ; ред. пер. А. К. Арынгазин. Астана : Индиго Принт, 2022. 398 с.
- Семёнов Е. В. О задаче возвращения профессионалов в систему управления наукой // Управление наукой: теория и практика. 2020. Т. 2. № 2. С. 93–116. doi: 10.19181/smtp.2020.2.2.4. EDN EEOGQP.
Қосымша файлдар

