Borisov's approach to the study of reflection in scientific cognition
- Authors: Kuskova S.M.1
-
Affiliations:
- Moscow Institute of Psychoanalysis
- Issue: Vol 7, No 4 (2025)
- Pages: 88-96
- Section: ФИЛОСОФЫ РОССИИ: ЖИЗНЬ И ТВОРЧЕСТВО
- URL: https://ogarev-online.ru/2658-7750/article/view/381440
- ID: 381440
Cite item
Abstract
The cognitive potential of rational philosophy is revealed in the analysis of the internal mechanisms of the development of scientific knowledge. The relevance of reflection research in science is determined by challenges from the dominant naturalistic and sociological trends. The classification of types of reflection proposed by V.N. Borisov is used in the analysis of various ways of substantiating science. The programs of substantiation of science by I. Kant and B. Russell are compared according to the types of reflexive procedures. Transcendental reflection refers the methods of physical cognition to philosophical metatheory. Scientific reflection reveals the methods of physics through psychological sciences. Different levels of reflection on cognitive procedures correspond to different relationships between scientific disciplines. The article substantiates the universality of classical rationality, the principles of the unity of scientific knowledge and the normative nature of philosophy in the development of natural science.
About the authors
Svetlana M. Kuskova
Moscow Institute of Psychoanalysis
Author for correspondence.
Email: adiafora@tut.by
SPIN-code: 5993-0750
Candidate of Philosophical Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of Humanities and Natural Sciences
Russian Federation, MoscowReferences
- Harutyunyan M.N., Neverova, T.A. Gnoseological and methodological aspects of scientific reflection: Monograph. Maykop: Publishing house Magarin O.G., 2023. 180 p.
- Bazhanov V.A. Science as a self-recognizing system. Kazan: Publishing House of Kazan University, 1991.
- Borisov V.N. Categorical knowledge: epistemological nature, forms, methods of functioning. Categorical foundations of scientific knowledge. Intercollegiate collection of scientific articles. Kuibyshev: Kuibyshev University, 1988. Pp. 5–29.
- Borisov V.N. Reflection in science: epistemological nature, forms, functions. Problems of reflection in scientific knowledge. Intercollegiate compilation. Kuibyshev, 1983. 160 p.
- Borisov V.N. Levels of the logical process and the main directions of their research. Novosibirsk: Nauka, Siberian branch, 1967. 211 p.
- Borisova T.V., Shekeleta V.O., Shestakov A.A. The phenomenon of the regional philosophical school: the experience of comprehending the activities of V.N. Borisov. Intellect. Innovation. Investments. 2025;2:75-87.
- Kant I. Criticism of pure reason. The essays. In 6 vol. Vol. 3. Moscow: Mysl, 1964. 799 p.
- Kononov E.A. Meta-ontology. Theoretical review. Moscow, 2024. 336 p.
- Mamchur E.A. Objectivity of science and relativism (To discussions in modern epistemology). Moscow, 2004. 242 p.
- Ognev A.N. The problem of the relationship between ontology and the theory of knowledge in the works of Samara philosophers of the late Soviet period. Philosophical sciences. 2022;65(2):33-66.
- Perminov V.Ya. On the a priori of classical mechanics. Questions of philosophy. 2014;12:45-57.
- Russell B. Human cognition, its spheres and boundaries. Kyiv, 1997. 557 p.
- Shabalkina E.E. Science in the "era of knowledge": levels of philosophical reflection. Philosophical problems of cognitive research: Collection of works based on the results of the All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference, Ulyanovsk, October 20–21, 2018. Vol. 1. Ulyanovsk: Ulyanovsk State University, 2018. Pp. 109–119.
- Shvyrev V.S. "On the ratio of cognitive and design-constructive functions in classical and modern science". Cognition, understanding, construction. Russian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Philosophy; ed. by V.A. Lektorsky. Moscow: IFRAN, 2007. 167 p.
- Shestakov A.A. Cognitive activity. Ways to overcome naturalism. Bulletin of Samara State Technical University. 2003;1(27):5-14.
Supplementary files
