From "accumulation" to navigation: how scientific communities adapt to fragmented epistemology
- Authors: Batsanova S.V.1, Khramova M.A.1
-
Affiliations:
- Belgorod State Technological University named after V.G. Shukhov
- Issue: Vol 7, No 4 (2025)
- Pages: 31-39
- Section: ФИЛОСОФИЯ И МЕТОДОЛОГИЯ НАУКИ
- URL: https://ogarev-online.ru/2658-7750/article/view/381434
- ID: 381434
Cite item
Abstract
The article examines the transformation of epistemological practices in the digital age and under social instability. It focuses on the phenomenon of "metric legitimation", where algorithms and engagement indicators replace traditional forms of expertise. The shift from accumulation to navigation is analyzed, with knowledge functioning as both access service and social signal. The precariat is shown as a key indicator of these changes, relying on situational and horizontal forms of verification. The risks of "epistemological compression" are highlighted, along with the need for hybrid procedures to preserve critical distance and the sustainability of scientific knowledge.
About the authors
Sofya V. Batsanova
Belgorod State Technological University named after V.G. Shukhov
Email: sophiko1881@yandex.ru
SPIN-code: 9432-2497
Candidate of Philological Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of Theory and Methodology of Science
Russian Federation, BelgorodMarina A. Khramova
Belgorod State Technological University named after V.G. Shukhov
Author for correspondence.
Email: sophiko1881@yandex.ru
SPIN-code: 1745-7039
postgraduate student, Department of Theory and Methodology of Science
Russian Federation, BelgorodReferences
- Alekseeva E.A. Methodological interaction of experimental and computer philosophy. Bulletin of RUDN University. Series: Philosophy. 2024;28(2):115-128.
- Babina V.N. The formation of cognitive practices in philosophical thought of the XIX–XX centuries. Moscow: Akademicheskiy proekt, 2012. 240 p.
- Gromyko Yu.V., Prosekin M.Yu. Activity cognitive science in the context of digitalization. Questions of philosophy. 2024;4:42-52.
- Efimov A.R., Ageeva A.V., Krainov A.G. [et al.]. Artificial intelligence in science: on the verge of a new field of knowledge? Questions of philosophy. 2024;4:30-41.
- Ignatov M.A. Change in the network society through the prism of nomadology and schemology. Moscow: Nauka. Iskusstvo. Kultura, 2020. 132 p.
- Kalinina G.N. Current trends in non-classical epistemology against the background of pluralism of cognitive practices. Moscow: Nika, 2016. 152 p.
- Katunin A.V. The problem of the cognitive unconscious: a philosophical view. Questions of philosophy. 2024;4:64-75.
- Orekhov A.M. Digital inequality and digital justice. Bulletin of RUDN University. Series: Philosophy. 2024;28(3):64-76.
- Chernikova I.V. Evolutionary epistemology as a cognitive practice of post-classical science. Yekaterinburg: UrFU, 2008. 184 p.
- Chernikova I.V. Evolutionary cognitivism: ontological foundations and epistemological perspective. Yekaterinburg: UrFU, 2010. 196 p.
- Hastuti H., Pratiwi S., Rohim R. Algorithmic Influence and Media Legitimacy: A Systematic Review of Algorithmic Authority. Frontiers in Communication. 2025;10:151.
- Holm S. Algorithmic Legitimacy in Clinical Decision-Making. Ethics and Information Technology. 2023;25(3):331-342.
- Neuberger C. The Digital Transformation of the Knowledge Order: A Model for the Platformization of Public Communication. Digital Journalism. 2023;11(9):1456-1475.
- Schwengerer L. Critical Social Epistemology of Social Media and Epistemic Trust. Social Epistemology. 2024;38(5):401-419.
- Shin D. Fact-Checking as Epistemic Infrastructure: Algorithms, Trust, and Public Knowledge. Journalism Studies (SAGE). 2025;26(2):210-226.
- UNESCO. UNESCO Science Report 2021: The Race Against Time for Smarter Development. Paris: UNESCO, 2021. Available from: https://www.unesco.org/reports/science/2021 (accessed: 03.09.2025).
Supplementary files
