Immunomodulatory feed additives for farm animals and fish
- Authors: Rudoy D.V.1, Ponomareva E.N.1, Mangasaryan D.S.1, Maltseva T.A.1
-
Affiliations:
- Don State Technical University
- Issue: Vol 17, No 6-2 (2025)
- Pages: 652-668
- Section: Статьи
- Published: 30.12.2025
- URL: https://ogarev-online.ru/2658-6649/article/view/371768
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.12731/2658-6649-2025-17-6-2-1590
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/DHCYQT
- ID: 371768
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Background. Modern applied biotechnology is focused on the development and implementation of fundamentally new multifunctional feed additives in a complex form. Currently, new approaches to the maintenance of farm animals and aquaculture objects under the influence of environmental factors are being sought, based on the use of biologically active additives. Intensive antibiotic therapy has become one of the reasons for the disruption of normal bacteriocenosis and a decrease in the immunobiological reactivity of animals and fish, the emergence of resistant strains of pathogens, which reduces the therapeutic effect of antibacterial drugs. The use of antibiotics leads to the accumulation of microorganisms with complex antibiotic resistance in the environment, their entry into natural water bodies is almost impossible. One of the promising ways to solve these problems is the use of feed additives with immunomodulatory action. The article examines existing feed additives with biological activity, provides generalized literature data on the use of biological additives in animal husbandry and aquaculture.
Purpose. The objective of the present study is to investigate impact of immunomodulatory feed additives on farm animals and fish.
Materials and methods. Feeds play a crucial role in the diet of farm animals and fish, as they must contain all the necessary nutrients, vitamins and minerals to ensure healthy growth and development of animals and aquaculture objects. Such preparations as probiotics (including symbiotics and metabiotics), prebiotics, and synbiotics, which are actively used in feed production, meet these requirements. In 1995, Gibson and Robertfroy introduced the concepts that should be classified as prebiotics and found that these components should be: 1) a selective component that promotes the metabolic activity or growth of one or more beneficial bacteria; 2) capable of altering the microbiota towards a healthy state; 3) capable of exerting a systemic or luminal beneficial effect on the host organism; 4) not absorbed and not hydrolyzed in the upper part of the stomach.
Results. Current research shows the positive impact of prebiotic use on performance, including improved weight gain, improved feed conversion and reduced disease. Prebiotics promote the growth of beneficial microorganisms such as bifidobacteria and lactobacilli in the intestines of animals. This reduces the concentration of pathogens such as salmonella and coliform bacteria, which reduces the risk of disease and improves the overall health of animals and fish. Research confirms the possibility of reducing the use of antibiotics in feed through the use of prebiotics, which is important in the context of the problem of antibiotic resistance. Prebiotics can be used to improve the environmental sustainability of livestock and aquaculture, as they help to reduce the release of harmful substances into the environment.
Conclusion. Numerous scientific studies confirm the beneficial effects of immunomodulatory additives on the health of animals, poultry and aquaculture objects, especially in terms of protection against pathogens, stimulation of the immune response and increased productivity. Prebiotics can be used as an alternative or enhance the effect of probiotics. The use of a combination of these components, demonstrating a synergistic effect, can be even more effective in stimulating the intestinal microbiota and protecting animal health. One promising area of research is the use of wheat grain heap as an immunomodulatory additive, which has high prebiotic properties.
In the future, it is necessary to pay attention to studies of the thermal treatment of grain in the production of feed and feed additives. It should be emphasized that the use of feed additives such as probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics is safe, does not have a negative impact on the natural environment and reduces the demand for antibiotic-based growth promoters. However, the mechanisms of action of probiotic organisms, prebiotics, and their combinations in synbiotics require further research. In the technology of compound feed production, plant raw materials, including wheat, are subjected to the extrusion process in order to increase the nutritional value, during which, during heat treatment, pathogenic microorganisms are killed. Presumably, wheat grain of early ripeness phases may lose its beneficial properties during heat treatment (extrusion). In this regard, it is advisable to conduct research on the effect of grain processing on its prebiotic properties.
Keywords
About the authors
Dmitry V. Rudoy
Don State Technical University
Author for correspondence.
Email: dmitriyrudoi@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1916-8570
Scopus Author ID: 57212389828
Doctor of Engineering Sciences, Head of the Specialized organization of the territorial cluster “Dolina Dona” of the Rostov region, Dean of the Faculty “Agribusiness”, Chief Researcher of the Research laboratory “Agrobiotechnology Center”, Associate Professor of the Department “Technologies and Equipment for Processing Agricultural Products”
Russian Federation, 1, Gagarin Sq., Rostov-on-Don, 344000, Russian Federation
Elena N. Ponomareva
Don State Technical University
Email: enponomareva@donstu.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7129-6676
Professor of the Department “Technical Means of Aquaculture”
Russian Federation, 1, Gagarin Sq., Rostov-on-Don, 344000, Russian Federation
Dzhuletta S. Mangasaryan
Don State Technical University
Email: juliasarkisyan16@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6491-2656
Scopus Author ID: 57220954111
Engineer of the Development center of the territorial cluster “Dolina Dona”, Lecturer of the Department “Food Production Equipment and Technologies”
Russian Federation, 1, Gagarin Sq., Rostov-on-Don, 344000, Russian Federation
Tatyana A. Maltseva
Don State Technical University
Email: tamalceva@donstu.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3973-6846
Scopus Author ID: 57219444434
Senior Researcher of the Development center of the territorial cluster “Dolina Dona”, Associate Professor of the Department “Technologies and Equipment for Processing Agricultural Products”
Russian Federation, 1, Gagarin Sq., Rostov-on-Don, 344000, Russian Federation
References
- Baumgärtner, S., James, J., & Ellison, A. (2022). The supplementation of a prebiotic improves the microbial community in the gut and the skin of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Aquaculture Reports, 25, 101204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aqrep.2022.101204. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/XQGEQS
- Binda, S., Hill, C., Johansen, E., Obis, D., Pot, B., Sanders, M. E., Tremblay, A., & Ouwehand, A. C. (2020). Criteria to qualify microorganisms as “probiotic” in foods and dietary supplements. Frontiers in Microbiology, 11, 1662. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.01662. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/BTYBTR
- Ceslovas, J., Vigilijus, J., & Almantas, S. (2005). The effect of probiotic and phytobiotics on meat properties and quality in pigs. Veterinarija ir Zootechnika, 29, 80–84.
- D’Agaro, E., Gibertoni, P., & Esposito, S. (2022). Recent trends and economic aspects in the rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) sector. Applied Sciences, 12(17), 8773. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12178773. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/KLOQEP
- Fangueiro, J. F., Carvalho, N. M., Antunes, F., et al. (2023). Lignin from sugarcane bagasse as a prebiotic additive for poultry feed. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 239, 124262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.124262. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/HKDPNR
- FAO. (2024). Cereal supply and demand brief: Reduced maize harvest drives a modest decline in global cereal production in 2024. Retrieved from https://www.fao.org/worldfoodsituation/csdb/en (accessed on 24 September 2024).
- Fuller, R. (1989). Probiotics in man and animals. Journal of Applied Bacteriology, 66(5), 365–378.
- Gibson, G., Hutkins, R., Sanders, M., et al. (2017). Expert consensus document: The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics (ISAPP) consensus statement on the definition and scope of prebiotics. Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology, 14, 491–502. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrgastro.2017.75. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/YACKZJ
- Grigoriev, V., Kovaleva, A., Geraskin, P., Sorokina, M., Korchunov, A., Rudoy, D., & Olshevskaya, A. (2023). Use of compound feed with the probiotic feed supplement based on Bacillus bacteria for sterlet producers. E3S Web of Conferences, 381, 01073. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202338101073. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/GDXWAE
- Holzapfel, W. H., & Schillinger, U. (2002). Introduction to pre- and probiotics. Food Research International, 35, 109–116.
- Imperial, I. C. V. J., & Ibana, J. A. (2016). Addressing the antibiotic resistance problem with probiotics: reducing the risk of its double-edged sword effect. Frontiers in Microbiology, 7, 1983.
- Jeong, J. S., & Kim, I. H. (2014). Effect of Bacillus subtilis C-3102 spores as a probiotic feed supplement on growth performance, noxious gas emission, and intestinal microflora in broilers. Poultry Science, 93(12), 3097–3103. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2014-04086
- Jung, S. J., Houde, R., Baurhoo, B., Zhao, X., & Lee, B. H. (2008). Effects of galacto-oligosaccharides and a Bifidobacteria lactis-based probiotic strain on the growth performance and fecal microflora of broiler chickens. Poultry Science, 87(9), 1694–1699. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2007-00489
- Juśkiewicz, J., Jankowski, J., Zduńczyk, Z., & Mikulski, D. (2006). Performance and gastrointestinal tract metabolism of turkeys fed diets with different contents of fructooligosaccharides. Poultry Science, 85(5), 886–891. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/85.5.886
- Kim, J. S., Ingale, S. L., Kim, Y. W., et al. (2012). Effect of supplementation of multi-microbe probiotic product on growth performance, apparent digestibility, cecal microbiota and small intestinal morphology of broilers. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition, 96(4), 618–626. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0396.2011.01187.x
- Lachuga, Yu. F., Meskhi, B. Ch., Pakhomov, V. I., Rudoy, D. V., Kambulov, S. I., & Maltseva, T. A. (2023). Study of changes in the amino acid composition of spiked cereals during the ripening process. Engineering Technologies and Systems, 33(4), 508–523. https://doi.org/10.15507/2658-4123.033.202304.508-523. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/KFLTHG
- Lee, Y. K. (2009). Handbook of probiotics and prebiotics (pp. 177–187). New Jersey: Wiley.
- Liao, S. F., & Nyachoti, M. (2017). Using probiotics to improve swine gut health and nutrient utilization. Animal Nutrition, 3(4), 331–343.
- Ma, N., Guo, P., Zhang, J., He, T., Kim, S. W., Zhang, G., & Ma, X. (2018). Nutrients mediate intestinal bacteria-mucosal immune crosstalk. Frontiers in Immunology, 9, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2018.00005. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/YFLUHJ
- Maiorano, G., Stadnicka, K., Tavaniello, S., et al. (2017). In ovo validation model to assess the efficacy of commercial prebiotics on broiler performance and oxidative stability of meat. Poultry Science, 96(2), 511–518.
- Maiorano, G., Stadnicka, K., Tavaniello, S., et al. (2017). In ovo validation model to assess the efficacy of commercial prebiotics on broiler performance and oxidative stability of meat. Poultry Science, 96(2), 511–518.
- Markowiak, P., & Śliżewska, K. (2018). The role of probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics in animal nutrition. Gut Pathogens, 10, 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13099-018-0250-0. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/UVHZSH
- Mookiah, S., Sieo, C. C., Ramasamy, K., Abdullah, N., & Ho, Y. W. (2014). Effects of dietary prebiotics, probiotic and synbiotics on performance, caecal bacterial populations and caecal fermentation concentrations of broiler chickens. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 94(2), 341–348. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.6365
- Olesen, I., Bonaldo, A., Farina, R., et al. (2023). Moving beyond agriculture and aquaculture to integrated sustainable food systems as part of a circular bioeconomy. Frontiers in Marine Science, 10, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2023.1178014. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/EMOFTI
- Rudoy, D. V., Pakhomov, V. I., Braginets, S. V., Maltseva, T. A., & Sarkisyan, D. S. (2023). Study of the content of vitamins and minerals in wheat grain at different stages of ripeness. Bulletin of the Ryazan State Agrotechnological University named after P. A. Kostychev, 15(3), 38–44. https://doi.org/10.36508/RSATU.2023.20.14.006. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/XDHALC
- Rudoy, D. V. (2023). Results of testing compound feed with a grain heap of wheat of early maturity phases. Polythematic Network Electronic Scientific Journal of the Kuban State Agrarian University, 04(188), 1882304013. https://doi.org/10.21515/1990-4665-188-013
- Rudoy, D. V. (2023). Study of the nutritional value of grain at different stages of maturity. Polythematic Network Electronic Scientific Journal of the Kuban State Agrarian University, 06(190), 1902306016. https://doi.org/10.21515/1990-4665-190-016. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/GYOPYL
Supplementary files


