Intelligent models and sustainability assessment of the security system of agro-industrial enterprises

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Background. In the era of digitalization, maintaining resilient security systems in agro-industrial enterprises is crucial. This paper examines approaches to developing intelligent models aimed at assessing and predicting the resilience of organizational and technical systems based on the analysis of interrelated risk factors. Cognitive and fuzzy modeling approaches are applied as methodological tools to formalize expert knowledge and support managerial decision-making. A methodology for constructing an integrated resilience indicator that takes into account both external and internal dynamics is proposed. Scenario analysis demonstrates the potential of intelligent algorithms to model critical situations and to select optimal response measures. The developed models can be applied to strengthen infrastructure protection strategies, enhance information and physical security, and ensure the sustainable operation of enterprises in uncertain environments.

The aim of the study is to develop and verify a model based on fuzzy cognitive maps (FCMs) for the mathematical assessment of the resilience of agricultural enterprise security systems. The work aims to integrate expert knowledge, scenario modeling, and dynamic visualization of system behavior under changing external and internal factors.

Materials and methods. The methodological framework of the study is based on cognitive and fuzzy modeling, simulation, and machine learning. FCMs are used as tools, accounting for uncertainty, the subjectivity of expert assessments, and nonlinear relationships between factors. Logistic Regression, Random Forest, and XGBoost algorithms, implemented in Python, were used for computational experiments. The analysis was conducted using the IGLA package for constructing cognitive models and assessing impact scenarios.

Results. An intelligent security system resilience model was developed, incorporating five key concepts: financial resilience, human resources, technological reliability, information security, and organizational processes. Scenario modeling was conducted to identify the impact of various management strategies on the integrated resilience indicator. Scenario simulations revealed that an integrated approach can increase overall system resilience by 15–20% compared to isolated security improvements.

Machine learning experiments achieved a high classification accuracy (up to 0.98) across all models, with logistic regression providing the best balance between precision and recall.

Conclusion. Intelligent models based on fuzzy cognitive maps and machine learning methods provide effective assessments of the resilience of security systems in agricultural enterprises. The proposed approach allows for the consideration of uncertainty, modeling threat scenarios, and improving the adaptability of security systems. The practical significance of this work lies in the potential application of the developed models to improve infrastructure protection strategies, enhance information and physical security, and ensure the stable operation of enterprises in uncertain environments.

About the authors

Angelina I. Dubrovina

Don State Technical University

Author for correspondence.
Email: ministrelia69@yandex.ru

Associate Professor of the department «Cybersecurity of information systems»

 

Russian Federation, 1, Gagarin Sq., Rostov-on-Don, 344000, Russian Federation

References

  1. Campoverde-Molina, N., & Luján-Mora, C. (2024). Cybersecurity in smart agriculture: a systematic literature review. Computers & Security, 144, 104284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2024.104284
  2. Kozłowski, J. (2024). Cybersecurity of milking robots in smart dairy farms. Sustainability, 16, 6534. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16186534. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/URYFKU
  3. Gava, S., Carta, E., Campostrini, S., Spolaore, P., & Dario, C. (2024). Fuzzy cognitive mapping for public health: a scoping review. Archives of Public Health, 82, 34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-024-01307-y. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/FOXYHJ
  4. Bakhtavar, E., Valipour, M., Yousefi, S., et al. (2021). Fuzzy cognitive maps in systems risk analysis: a comprehensive review. Complex & Intelligent Systems, 7, 621–637. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40747-020-00228-2. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/CXRCVA
  5. Kotsiopoulos, I., Georgopoulos, K., Doulamis, N., & Doulamis, A. (2024). Digital twins in agriculture and forestry: review and research challenges. Sensors, 24, 1490. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24041490. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/RXWPJQ
  6. Li, Z., Yang, B., Li, X., & Liu, J. (2024). Digital twins in agriculture: orchestration and applications. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 72. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.3c07126
  7. Bala, P., Dhar, P. K., Islam, M. M., et al. (2024). Agricultural drought prediction using machine learning with multi-source data. Scientific Reports, 14, 6035. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-56145-9
  8. Ahsan, U. F., Haleem, M. S., & Naeem, M. (2022). Blockchain-based traceability and data security in agri-food supply chains: a systematic review. PLoS ONE, 17, e0278328. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0278328. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/WOTVUG
  9. Jiao, W., Wang, L., & McCabe, M. F. (2021). Multi-sensor remote sensing for drought characterization: status, opportunities and roadmap. Remote Sensing of Environment, 256, 112313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2021.112313. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/YBVDOR
  10. Khani, A., Nazemi, A., & Haghighi, A. T. (2024). Agricultural drought monitoring: a comparative review of traditional and remote-sensing indices. Atmosphere, 15, 1129. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15091129. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/LQDNNB
  11. Alsaedi, A., Moustafa, N., Tari, Z., Mahmood, A., & Anwar, A. (2020). TON_IoT telemetry dataset: a new generation dataset of IoT and IIoT for data-driven intrusion detection systems. IEEE Access, 8, 165130–165150. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3022862. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/VPECYP
  12. Ehtesham, B., Waseem, M., & Shah, S. M. A. (2024). Enhancing intrusion detection systems’ performance with UNSW-NB15 dataset using machine learning. Algorithms, 17, 64. https://doi.org/10.3390/a17020064. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/GKQAJL
  13. Al-Kadhim, H., & Qahwaji, R. (2022). Analysis of ToN-IoT, UNSW-NB15 and Edge-IIoT datasets using deep learning for IoT security. Applied Sciences, 12, 9572. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12199572. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/OXUBIS
  14. Alhaj, A., Dehghantanha, A., & Parizi, R. M. (2025). Deep learning-driven methods for network-based intrusion detection systems: a systematic review. Intelligent Systems and Applications, 26, 200347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iswa.2025.200347
  15. Knipper, K. C., Senay, G. B., et al. (2020). Satellite-based monitoring of irrigation water use: assessing gaps and opportunities. Water Resources Research, 56, e2020WR028378. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR028378
  16. Moustafa, N., & Slay, J. (2016). UNSW-NB15: a comprehensive data set for network intrusion detection systems (UNSW-NB15 network data set). IEEE Access, 4, 711–718. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2016.7603518
  17. Kotsiopoulos, V. K., & Bandekas, D. V. (2023). IoT-enabled smart farming and cybersecurity: challenges and perspectives. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 213, 108176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2023.108176. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/EJIHJK
  18. Alharbi, A., & Alsubhi, K. (2024). Enhancing intrusion detection in IoT networks using machine learning and ToN-IoT dataset. Journal of Cyber Security and Technology, 8, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/23742917.2024.2321381
  19. Milan, M., & Azizi, M. (2023). Satellite-based drought monitoring using optimal indices across diverse land covers. Ecological Informatics, 75, 102260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2023.102260
  20. Hameed, M. S., & Khedr, A. M. (2021). Network intrusion detection using deep learning on UNSW-NB15: improvements and challenges. Procedia Computer Science, 184, 340–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.03.043

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).