Reproductive qualities of boars in the assessment of adaptive capabilities when using introductory crossbreeding of different variants

Мұқаба

Дәйексөз келтіру

Толық мәтін

Аннотация

Background. The article deals with the study of the reproductive performance of breeding boars of Poltava meat breed when using different variants of introductory crossbreeding. At the same time, the objectives of using introductory crossbreeding determine the dynamics of changes.

By introductory crossing in the breed new genotypes were created with Finnish Landrace pigs (in order to improve productive qualities) and fast-ripening meat pigs (in order to increase the adaptive capacity of animals to natural and climatic conditions of the farm). To conduct research we formed four groups according to the principle of pair-analogs: Group I – boars descendants of introductory crossbreeding, with a share of blood of the fast-ripening meat breed 25%, Group II – boars descendants of introductory crossbreeding, with a share of blood of the Finnish Landrace breed 25%, Group III – boars descendants of introductory crossbreeding, with a share of blood of the fast-ripening meat breed 50%, Group IV – boars descendants of introductory crossbreeding, with a share of blood of the Finnish Landrace breed 50%. We evaluated boar development indicators (live weight, body length, age at 100 kg live weight, thickness of the bailiffs follower) and indicators characterizing reproductive capacity (number of inseminated and farrowed breeding sows, fertilizing capacity of the boar, multiple fertility of farrowed breeding sows, weight of one piglet at weaning at 45 days).

Infusion of Finnish Landrace blood in order to improve meat qualities leads in boars of Poltava meat breed to a violation of adaptive capabilities, manifested in an increase in the age of achieving a live weight of 100 kg and a decrease in reproductive performance, not actively involved in the selection process. Increasing the level of bloodlines of breeding boars up to 50% for Finnish Landrace breed is not reasonable in these natural and climatic conditions and will require additional costs to improve efficiency.

The infusion of blood of the soon-to-be ripe meat breed to boars of Poltava meat breed with the purpose of improvement of adaptive qualities leads to strengthening of adaptive properties of the organism, by means of increase of protective capabilities and increase of reproductive indicators.

Purpose. The aim of the study is to investigate reproductive qualities of boars in the evaluation of adaptive capabilities when using introductory crossbreeding of different variants

Materials and methods. The data of 40 breeding boars-producers of Poltava meat breed, belonging to genetic groups with the infusion of blood of Finnish Landrace and soon-breeding meat breed, were used in the work. All animals belonged to the elite and first classes. The age of the animals was 24 months.

We evaluated boar development indicators (live weight, body length, age at 100 kg live weight, thickness of the rump) and indicators characterizing reproductive capacity (number of inseminated and farrowed sows, fertilizing capacity of the boar, multiple fertility of farrowed sows, weight of one piglet at weaning at 45 days, weight of one piglet at weaning at 45 days).

Results. As a result of the study it was found that in boars of Poltava meat breed of all examined groups the obtained average values of live weight and body length did not differ significantly from each other.

The study revealed that the use of introductory crossbreeding using 25% bloodlines for the two improving breeds did not cause significant changes in the average number of sows inseminated and interviewed. Increasing the proportion of bloodlines up to 50% resulted in multidirectional significant differences depending on the breeds used. Thus, the use of Finnish Landrace breed decreased the value of both studied indicators by 20.96 head (64.6%) (p≤0.05) and 15.77 head (66.4%) (p≤0.05), respectively.

When the proportion of bloodlines of the fast-ripening meat breed increased from 25% to 50%, boars showed a significant increase in the number of farrowing sows by 9.85 head or 41.5% (p≤0.05). This group also showed the highest value of fertilizing ability of boars. The difference amounted to 13.49% (p≤0.05) compared to the group with lower bloodlines. No significant differences were found in groups with Finnish Landrace blood for this indicator.

Conclusion. The infusion of the blood of the fast-ripening meat breed in order to increase the adaptive qualities of the Poltava meat breed and increasing the share of its bloodline up to 50% led to a reliable increase in reproductive indicators (the number of inseminated sows, the number of farrowing sows, the fertilizing ability of the boar), not related to the primary in the breeding process, but determining, among other things, the efficiency of the pig breeding industry.

In the indicators of development, the use of blood of the early maturing meat breed was reflected in the indicator of the thickness of the speck. We found a significant increase in fat thickness with increasing bloodlines of the fast-ripening beef breed. Earlier studies have clearly shown that increased fat thickness can have a favorable effect on reproductive performance. Our study also demonstrated a significant effect of rump thickness on the fertilizing ability of boars. Taking into account that an increase in the thickness of the rump can be considered as an increase in the protective properties of the skin, it gives us the opportunity to talk about the increase in the protective and adaptive (adaptive) capabilities of the organism in this case.

Авторлар туралы

Natalia Garskaya

Lugansk State Pedagogical University

Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: Natalya_G@bk.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5350-8770

Associate Professor of Laboratory Diagnostics, Anatomy and Physiology Department

 

Ресей, 2, Oboronnaya Str., Lugansk, 291011, Russian Federation

Sergey Tresnitsky

Don State Technical University

Email: Tresnitskiydonstu@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9641-5363

Head of the Department of Biology and General Pathology

 

Ресей, 1, Gagarin Sq., Rostov-on-Don, 344000, Russian Federation

Andrey Rudenko

Russian Biotechnological University (ROSBIOTECH)

Email: vetrudek@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6434-3497

Professor of the Department of Veterinary Medicine

 

Ресей, 11, Volokolamskoye Highway, Moscow, 125080, Russian Federation

Galina Zelenkova

Don State Technical University

Email: galinazelenkova2025@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8562-4423

Docent of the Department of Biology and General Pathology

 

Ресей, 1, Gagarin Sq., Rostov-on-Don, 344000, Russian Federation

Anastasia Kochetkova

Don State Technical University

Email: lastik61@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0005-7888-7160

Docent of the Department of Biology and General Pathology

 

Ресей, 1, Gagarin Sq., Rostov-on-Don, 344000, Russian Federation

Әдебиет тізімі

  1. Knox, R. V. (2024). Swine fertility in a changing climate. Animal Reproduction Science, 269, 107537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2024.107537
  2. Mateo-Otero, Y. (2024). Integrating metabolomics into reproduction: Sperm metabolism and fertility enhancement in pigs. Animal Reproduction Science, 269, 107539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2024.107539
  3. Gonzalez-Peña, D., Knox, R. V., Pettigrew, J., & Rodriguez-Zas, S. L. (2014). Impact of pig insemination technique and semen preparation on profitability. Journal of Animal Science, 92(1), 72–84. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2013-6836
  4. Ngo, C. B., Morrell, J. M., & Tummaruk, P. (2025). Boar semen microbiome: Insights and potential implications. Animal Reproduction Science, 272, 107647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2024.107647. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/UVEYYG
  5. Hensel, B., Henneberg, S., Kleve-Feld, M., Jung, M., & Schulze, M. (2024). Selection and direct biomarkers of reproductive capacity of breeding boars. Animal Reproduction Science, 269, 107490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2024.107490
  6. Chan, J. C., Morgan, C. P., Leu, N. A., Shetty, A., Cisse, Y. M., Nugent, B. M., Morrison, K. E., Jasarevic, E., Huang, W., Kanyuch, N., Rodgers, A. B., Bhanu, N. V., Berger, D. S., Garcia, B. A., Ament, S., Kane, M., Epperson, C. N., & Bale, T. L. (2020). Reproductive tract extracellular vesicles are sufficient to transmit intergenerational stress and program neurodevelopment. Nature Communications, 11, 1499. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15305-w. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/YIPLAS
  7. Lismer, A., & Kimmins, S. (2023). Emerging evidence that the mammalian sperm epigenome serves as a template for embryo development. Nature Communications, 14, 2142. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-37820-2. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/BQNKIS
  8. Dahlen, C. R., Ramírez-Zamudio, G. D., Bochantin-Winders, K. A., Hurlbert, J. L., Crouse, M. S., McLean, K. J., Diniz, W. J. S., Amat, S., Snider, A. P., Caton, J. S., & Reynolds, L. P. (2024). International Symposium on Ruminant Physiology: Paternal nutrient supply: Impacts on physiological and whole animal outcomes in offspring. Journal of Dairy Science, 20. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2024-25800
  9. Berckmans, D. (2017). General introduction to precision livestock farming. Animal Frontiers, 7, 6–11. https://doi.org/10.2527/af.2017.0102
  10. FAO. (2010). The State of the World’s Animal Genetic Resources in Food and Agriculture. Moscow: VIZH RAAS. (Translated from English: FAO, 2007. The State of the World’s Animal Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture, edited by B. Rischkowsky & D. Pilling, Rome.)
  11. Callegaro, S., Tiezzi, F., Fabbri, M. C., Biffani, S., & Bozzi, R. (2024). Evaluating genotype by environment interaction for growth traits in Limousine cattle. Animal, 18(11), 101344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2024.101344. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/LYWOIQ
  12. Brandt, H., Werner, D. N., Baulain, U., Brade, W., & Weissmann, F. (2 Newton). Genotype-environment interactions for growth and carcass traits in different pig breeds kept under conventional and organic production systems. Animal, 4(4), 535–544. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731109991509
  13. Knap, P. W., & Su, G. (2008). Genotype by environment interaction for litter size in pigs as quantified by reaction norms analysis. Animal, 2(12), 1742–1747. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731108003145
  14. Rose, G., Mulder, H. A., Greeff, J. C., Thompson, A. N., van der Werf, J. H. J., & van Arendonk, J. A. M. (2024). Examining across year genotype by environment interactions for production and reproduction traits in Merino sheep. Small Ruminant Research, 238, 107325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2024.107325. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/KAQIWC
  15. Canario, L., Mignon-Grasteau, S., Dupont-Nivet, M., & Phocas, F. (2013). Genetics of behavioural adaptation of livestock to farming conditions. Animal, 7(3), 357–377. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731112001978
  16. Abdul Niyas, A., Chaidanya, K., Shaji, S., Sejian, V., Bhatta, R., Bagath, M., Rao, G. S. L. H. V. P., & Girish, V. (2015). Adaptation of livestock to environmental challenges. Journal of Veterinary Science and Medical Diagnosis, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.4172/2325-9590.1000162
  17. Phocas, F., Belloc, C., Bidanel, J., Delaby, L., Dourmad, J. Y., Dumont, B., Ezanno, P., Fortun-Lamothe, L., Foucras, G., Frappat, B., González-García, E., Hazard, D., Larzul, C., Lubac, S., Mignon-Grasteau, S., Moreno, C. R., Tixier-Boichard, M., & Brochard, M. (2016). Review: Towards the agroecological management of ruminants, pigs and poultry through the development of sustainable breeding programmes. II. Breeding strategies. Animal, 10(11), 1760–1769. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731116001051
  18. Thutwa, K., Chabo, R., Nsoso, S. J., Mareko, M., Kgwatalala, P. M., & Owusu-Sekyere, E. (2020). Indigenous Tswana pig production characteristics and management practices in southern districts of Botswana. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 52(2), 517–524. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-019-02037-3. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/WPLLGE
  19. Knecht, D., Jankowska-Mąkosa, A., & Duziński, K. (2017). The effect of age, interval collection and season on selected semen parameters and prediction of AI boars productivity. Livestock Science, 201, 13–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2017.04.013
  20. Knecht, D., Jankowska-Mąkosa, A., & Duziński, K. (2017). Boar genotype as a factor shaping age-related changes in semen parameters and reproduction longevity simulations. Theriogenology, 98, 50–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2017.04.050
  21. Garskaya, N., Peretyatko, L., Pozyabin, S., Tresnitskiy, S., & Tresnitskiy, A. (2022). Influence of heat stress on the reproduction rates of sows of the Poltava meat breed, depending on the genotype. BIO Web of Conferences. International Scientific and Practical Conference “Sustainable Development of Traditional and Organic Agriculture in the Concept of Green Economy” (SDGE 2021), 42, 01026. https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20224201026
  22. Arsenakis, I., Appeltant, R., Sarrazin, S., Rijsselaere, T., Van Soom, A., & Maes, D. (2017). Relationship between semen quality and meat quality traits in Belgian Piétrain boars. Livestock Science, 205, 36–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2017.09.009

Қосымша файлдар

Қосымша файлдар
Әрекет
1. JATS XML


Creative Commons License
Бұл мақала лицензия бойынша қол жетімді Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).