The influence of hybrid forms of work organization on workplace ergonomics and the psychological well-being of employees
- Authors: Lukashenko D.V1
-
Affiliations:
- Research Institute of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia
- Issue: Vol 8, No 7 (2025)
- Pages: 423-428
- Section: ARTICLES
- URL: https://ogarev-online.ru/2658-3313/article/view/377708
- ID: 377708
Cite item
Abstract
the purpose of this study is to analyze the impact of hybrid work organization forms (combining remote and office work) on workplace ergonomics and workers' psychological well-being in the post-pandemic economy. The research tasks include: 1) studying the theoretical foundations of labor psychology and ergonomics in the context of hybrid models; 2) empirical examination of the level of ergonomic adaptation and psychological well-being among 500 employees from various industries; 3) identifying correlations between ergonomics factors (lighting, furniture, digital interfaces) and well-being indicators (stress, job satisfaction, work-life balance); 4) developing recommendations for optimizing hybrid spaces. The methodology combines quantitative (surveys using PSS-10 scale for stress and NASA-TLX for cognitive load) and qualitative (in-depth interviews) approaches. The results show that 68% of respondents note a reduction in ergonomic risks in the hybrid format, but 42% experience increased stress due to blurred work-rest boundaries. Correlation analysis revealed a negative relationship (r = -0.45) between the quality of the home workspace and anxiety levels. Practical application: recommendations for HR specialists on implementing ergonomic standards in hybrid models, including subsidies for equipment and training programs on balance. The study contributes to increasing productivity and reducing staff turnover in organizations adapting to new labor realities. (252 words).
References
- International Labour Organization (ILO). (2024). World Employment and Social Outlook: Trends 2024. Geneva: ILO.URLhttps://www.ilo.org/global/research/global-reports/weso/trends2024/lang-en/index.htm (дата обращения: 20.05.2025)
- Kniffin K.M. et al. COVID-19 and the workplace: Implications, issues, and insights for future research and action // American Psychologist. 2021. Vol. 76. № 1. P. 63 – 77.
- Anderson U. et al. Ergonomic challenges in remote work: A systematic review // Applied Ergonomics. 2022. Vol. 98. P. 103 – 115. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103567
- Fifolt M. et al. Human factors psychology in technology design // Monitor on Psychology. 2025. Vol. 56. № 4. P. 12 – 18. URL: https://www.apa.org/monitor/2025/04-05/human-factors-technology-design (дата обращения: 15.06.2025)
- Deng M. et al. The future of human factors: Expanding opportunities // Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. 2025. Vol. 69. № 1. P. 123 – 127.
- Oakman J. et al. A rapid review of mental and physical health effects of working at home: How do we optimise health? // BMC Public Health. 2021. Vol. 21. № 1. P. 1825.
- Cohen S., Kamarck T., Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress // Journal of Health and Social Behavior. 1983. Vol. 24. № 4. P. 385 – 396. (Адаптация для России: Иванова Е.В. Психологический стресс в условиях удаленной работы // Вестник МГУ. Серия 14, Психология. 2022. № 2. С. 45 – 56.
- Hart S.G., Staveland L.E. Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research // Advances in Psychology. 1988. Vol. 52. P. 139 – 183.
- ISO 9241-210:2019. Ergonomics of human-system interaction – Part 210: Human-centred design for interactive systems. Geneva: ISO, 2019. 32 p.
- Braun V., Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology // Qualitative Research in Psychology. 2006. Vol. 3, № 2. P. 77 – 101.
- Parent-Lamarche A., Boulet M. Employee well-being in the era of hybrid work: A bibliometric analysis // Journal of Innovation & Knowledge. 2024. Vol. 9. № 3. P. 100 – 112.
- Charalampous M. et al. Hybrid working and psychological health: A systematic review // Occupational Medicine. 2025. Vol. 75. № 2. P. 89 – 97.
- Wang B. et al. Sense of belonging in hybrid work settings // Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. 2025. Vol. 71. P. 1 – 45.
- Soga L.R. et al. Unmasking the other face of flexible working practices: A systematic literature review // Journal of Business Research. 2022. Vol. 142. P. 648 – 662.
- BritSafe. Adaptability, ergonomics and wellbeing: Building blocks for the workplace in 2025 // Safety Management. 2025. P. 20 – 25. URL: https://www.britsafe.org/safety-management/2025/adaptability-ergonomics-and-wellbeing (дата обращения: 20.05.2025)
- Halpern D.F. Hybrid work, hybrid minds: Navigating mental health challenges // InBloom Project. 2025. P. 1 – 10. URL: https://inbloomproject.com/blog-2/hybrid-work-hybrid-minds (дата обращения: 12.06.2025)
- Magnavita N. et al. The intersection of COVID-19 and remote work: Effects on employees’ well-being // International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021. Vol. 18. № 24. P. 13194.
- Ipsen C. et al. Six key advantages of hybrid work // Cogent Psychology. 2021. Vol. 8, № 1. P. 1 – 14.
- Kniffin K.M. et al. Hybrid workers describe aspects that promote effectiveness // Cogent Psychology. 2024. Vol. 11. № 1. P. 2362535.
- Gerdin L. et al. Well-being of employees in a hybrid workplace // ResearchGate. 2024. P. 1 – 15. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/386904241 (дата обращения: 23.05.2025)
Supplementary files
