Prohibition of the rehabilitation of Nazism in international and foreign legislation: evolution and analysis

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The subject of this study is the prohibition of Nazism rehabilitation, established by international law, as well as the criminal legislation of individual States. The author emphasizes the importance of considering aspects for the most effective application of the above-mentioned norm within the Russian legal framework. The author examines in detail such international treaties as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights of 1948, the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms of 1950, the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide of 1948, the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination of 1965 and other acts of international organizations. Considerable attention is paid to the criminal legislation of foreign countries: Germany, Austria, Romania, France, CIS countries and others. The methodology of the research consists of such methods as formal legal, logical, systemic, comparative legal, as well as the method of analysis. The scientific novelty of this study lies in the fact that for the most effective application of the above-mentioned norm, a comprehensive analysis of international and foreign legislation is carried out for the presence of norms prohibiting the rehabilitation of Nazism. According to the results of the study, the author comes to the conclusion that in modern foreign criminal legislation there are three main types of regulation of criminal liability for the rehabilitation of Nazism. The author also revealed a tendency that the criminalization of the manifestation of Nazism in foreign countries mainly takes place in the form of consolidation of norms on crimes of denial, justification of the Holocaust, or as one of the factors of inciting social discord. The author stressed that for a more complete regulation of the issues considered, it is necessary to develop and adopt a single international treaty reflecting the prohibition on the rehabilitation of Nazism and its individual manifestations.

References

  1. Егорова Н.А. Реабилитация нацизма: уголовно-правовой анализ // Всероссийский криминологический журнал. 2015. Vol. 9. № 3. С. 494-503.
  2. Жариков Ю.С., Цветков Р.Н. Противодействие нацизму: монография. Москва, 2024. 187 с.
  3. Иванов А.Ю. Уголовная ответственность за реабилитацию нацизма: диссертация ... кандидата юридических наук. Ставрополь, 2017. 183 с.
  4. Кибальник А.Г., Иванов А.Ю. Реабилитация нацизма как преступление против мира и безопасности человечества. Москва: Юрлитинформ, 2019. – 276 с.
  5. Буровский А.М. Холокост. Были и небыли. 2011. URL: http://detectivebooks.ru/book/ 24522414/?page=1
  6. Варченко И.А., Литвяк Л.Г. Уголовное законодательство зарубежных стран об ответственности за преступления, аналогичные ст. 354.1 УК РФ «Реабилитация нацизма» (часть 2) // Гуманитарные, социально-экономические и общественные науки, 2015. Vol. 1. № 11-1. С. 257-260.
  7. Нюрнбергский процесс: сб. материалов. В 3 т. Т. 3. С. 445.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).