Emerging pollutants: Risks in salmon fish migration. A review

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The release of pollutants into the environment is a serious ecological problem due to the significant risks they pose both to ecosystems and to human health. The review considers the issues of detection and distribution of new pollutants, as well as sources of their entry into the environment and potential impact on ecosystems. The problem of wastewater pollution is especially urgent in the context of conservation of salmonid fish species. Pharmaceutical and veterinary drugs, components of personal hygiene products, microplastics, per- and polyfluorinated substances, brominated flame retardants, oil and a number of other toxicants enter freshwater bodies, which are especially important for the early stages of the salmon development and its following migration. The presence of pollutants in the aquatic environment depends on a source, their ability to bioaccumulate, as well as to degrade in the processes of biological and abiotic purification. High-resolution mass spectrometry in combination with gas or liquid chromatography can be recommended for detection of new pollutants. Due to high mass measurement accuracy and high specificity, this method is able to effectively identify pollutants even in the complex fish matrix. When conducting non-targeted and targeted screening with highly sensitive full scanning, it is advisable to use high-resolution mass analyzers (TOF, Q-TOF, Q-Orbitrap), which allow determining a number of new compounds. A promising direction in the complex assessment of the impact of pollutants on salmon fish species and the identification of indicators characterizing this impact is metabolomics. It is based on the study of low-molecular organic compounds — metabolites, both intermediate and final metabolic products in body fluids and tissues. Metabolomic profiling allows identifying important markers of the state of a water body under the influence of pollutants, which is necessary for the development of comprehensive regulations and guidelines for the effective handling of these pollutants.

About the authors

L. S. Abramova

Russian Federal Research Institute of Fisheries and Oceanography (VNIRO)

Email: abramova@vniro.ru
19, Okruzhnoy proezd, 105187, Moscow

A. V. Kozin

Russian Federal Research Institute of Fisheries and Oceanography (VNIRO)

Email: abramova@vniro.ru
19, Okruzhnoy proezd, 105187, Moscow

E. S. Guseva

Russian Federal Research Institute of Fisheries and Oceanography (VNIRO)

Email: abramova@vniro.ru
19, Okruzhnoy proezd, 105187, Moscow

References

  1. Câmara, J. S., Montesdeoca-Esponda, S., Freitas, J., Guedes-Alonso, R., Sosa-Ferrera, Z., Perestrelo, R. (2021). Emerging contaminants in seafront zones. Environmental impact and analytical approaches. Separations, 8(7), Article 95. https://doi.org/10.3390/separations8070095
  2. Sultan, M. B., Anik, A. H., Rahman, M. M. (2024). Emerging contaminants and their potential impacts on estuarine ecosystems: Are we aware of it? Marine Pollution Bulletin, 199, Article 115982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2023.115982
  3. Mofijur, M., Hasan, M. M., Ahmed, S. F., Djavanroodi, F., Fattah, I. M. R, Silitonga, A. S et al. (2024). Advances in identifying and managing emerging contaminants in aquatic ecosystems: Analytical approaches, toxicity assessment, transformation pathways, environmental fate, and remediation strategies. Environmental Pollution, 341, Article 122889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2023.122889
  4. Martin, O., Scholze, M., Ermler, S., McPhie, J., Bopp, S. K., Kienzler, A. et al. (2021). Ten years of research on synergisms and antagonisms inchemical mixtures: A systematic review and quantitative reappraisal of mixture studies. Environment International, 146, Article 106206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.106206
  5. Martins, I., Soares, J., Neuparth, T., Barreiro, A. F., Xavier, C., Antunes, C. et al. (2022). Prioritizing the effects of emerging contaminants on estuarine production under global warming scenarios. Toxics, 10(2), Article 46. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics10020046
  6. Lagunas-Rangel, F. A., Linnea-Niemi, J. V., Kudłak, B., Williams, M. J., Jönsson, J., Schiöth, H. B. (2022). Role of the synergistic interactions of environmental pollutants in the development of cancer. GeoHealth, 6(4), Article e2021GH000552. https://doi.org/10.1016/10.1029/2021GH000552
  7. National Institutes of Health (NIH). Open chemistry database PubChem. Retrieved from https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. Accessed July 2, 2024.
  8. Журкович, И. К., Мильман, Б. Л. (2023). Химическое пространство опасных веществ. Химическая безопасность, 7(2), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.25514/CHS.2023.2.25002
  9. Khan, N. A., López-Maldonado E. A., Majumder A., Singh S., Varshney, R., López J.R et al. (2023). A state-of-art-review on emerging contaminants: Environmental chemistry, health effect, and modern treatment methods. Chemosphere, 344, Article 140264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.140264
  10. Yu, Y., Wang, S., Yu, P., Wang, D., Hu, B., Zheng, P. et al. (2024). A bibliometric analysis of emerging contaminants (ECs) (2001–2021): Evolution of hotspots and research trends. Science of the Total Environment, 907, Article 168116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168116
  11. Veiga-Del-Baño, J. M., Cámara, M. Á., Oliva. J., Hernández-Cegarra A. T., Andreo-Martínez, P., Motas M. (2023). Mapping of emerging contaminants in coastal waters research: A bibliometric analysis of research output during 1986–2022. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 194(PtA), Article 115366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2023.115366
  12. Puri, M., Gandhi, K., Kumar, M. S. (2023). Emerging environmental contaminants: A global perspective on policies and regulations. Journal of Environmental Management, 332, Article 117344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117344
  13. Feng, W., Deng, Y., Yang, F., Miao, Q., Ngien, S. K. (2023). Systematic review of contaminants of emerging concern (CECs): Distribution, risks, and implications for water quality and health. Water, 15(22), Article 3922. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15223922
  14. Канзепарова, А. Н., Ваизова, И. А., Никифоров, А. И., Беляев, В. А. (2024). Итоги лососевой путины в Дальневосточном рыбохозяйственном бассейне в 2023 г. Бюллетень № 18 изучения тихоокеанских лососей на Дальнем Востоке, 18, 3–18. https://doi.org/10.26428/losos_bull18-2024-3-18
  15. ВНИИРО (2024). Делегация России приняла участие в работе международной организации по сохранению анадромных рыб. Электронный ресурс: http://vniro.ru/ru/novosti/arkhiv-za-2024-god/delegatsiya-rossii-prinyala-uchastie-v-rabote-mezhdunarodnoj-organizatsii-po-sokhraneniyu-anadromnykh-ryb Дата доступа 04.07.2024
  16. Yu, Y., Wang, Z., Yao, B., Zhou, Y. (2024). Occurrence, bioaccumulation, fate, and risk assessment of emerging pollutants in aquatic environments: A review. Science of the Total Environment, 923, Article 171388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.171388
  17. Falandysz, J., Liu, G., Rutkowska, M. (2024). Analytical progress on emerging pollutants in the environment: An overview of the topics. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 175, Article 117719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2024.117719
  18. Lisco, G., Giagulli, V. A., Iovino, M., Guastamacchia, E., Pergola, G., Triggiani, V. (2022). Endocrine-disrupting chemicals: Introduction to the theme. Endocrine, Metabolic and Immune Disorders — Drug Targets, 22(7), 677–685. https://doi.org/10.2174/1871530321666210413124425
  19. Subaramaniyam, U., Allimuthu, R. S., Vappu, S., Ramalingam, D., Balan, R., Paital, B., et al. (2023). Effects of microplastics, pesticides and nano-materials on fish health, oxidative stress and antioxidant defense mechanism. Frontiers in Physiology, 14, Article 1217666. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2023.1217666
  20. Jyoti, D., Sinha, R. (2023). Physiological impact of personal care product constituents on non-target aquatic organisms. Science of the Total Environment, 905, Article 167229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167229
  21. Chakraborty, A., Adhikary, S., Bhattacharya, S., Dutta, S., Chatterjee, S., Banerjee, D. et al. (2023). Pharmaceuticals and personal care products as emerging environmental contaminants: Prevalence, toxicity, and remedial approaches. ACS Chemical Health and Safety, 30(6), 362–388. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chas.3c00071
  22. Wydro, U., Wołejko, E., Luarasi, L., Puto, K., Tarasevičienė, Ž., Jabłońska-Trypuć, A. (2024). A review on pharmaceuticals and personal care products residues in the aquatic environment and possibilities for their remediation. Sustainability, 16(1), Article 169. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16010169
  23. Hawash, H. B., Moneer, A. A., Galhoum, A. A., Elgarahy, A. M., Mohamed, W. A. A., Samy, M. et al. (2023) Occurrence and spatial distribution of pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) in the aquatic environment, their characteristics, and adopted legislations. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 52, Article 103490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2023.103490
  24. Cunha, S. C, Menezes-Sousa, D, Mello, F. V., Miranda, J. A. T., Fogaca, F. H. S., Alonso, M. B. et al. (2022). Survey on endocrine-disrupting chemicals in seafood: Occurrence and distribution. Environmental Research, 210, Article 112886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.112886
  25. Rohani, M. F. (2023). Pesticides toxicity in fish: Histopathological and hematobiochemical aspects — a review. Emerging Contaminants. 9(3), Article 100234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emcon.2023.100234
  26. Ceger, P., Allen D., Blankinship, A., Choksi, N., Daniel, A., Eckel, W. B. et al. (2023). Evaluation of the fish acute toxicity test for pesticide registration, Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 139, Article 105340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2023.105340
  27. Huang, T., Zhao, Y., He, J., Cheng, H., Martyniuk, C. J., (2022). Endocrine disruption by azole fungicides in fish: A review of the evidence. Science of the Total Environment, 822, Article 153412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153412
  28. Li, X., Shen, X., Jiang, W., Xi, Y., Li, S. (2024). Comprehensive review of emerging contaminants: Detection technologies, environmental impact, and management strategies. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 278, Article 116420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2024.116420
  29. Diamond, M. L., Sigmund, G., Bertram, M. G., Ford, A. T, Ågerstrand, M., Carlini, G. et al. (2024). Exploring outputs of the intergovernmental science-policy panel on chemicals, waste, and pollution prevention. Environmental Science and Technology Letters,11(7), 664–672. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.4c00294
  30. IARC. (2022). Gentian violet, leucogentian violet, malachite green, leucomalachite green, and CI Direct Blue 218. IARC Monographs on the Identification of Carcinogenic Hazards to Humans, 2022.
  31. Liu, Y., Wu, N.-N., Xu, R., Li, Z.-H., Xu, X.-R., Liu, S. (2024). Phthalates released from microplastics can’t be ignored: Sources, fate, ecological risks, and human exposure risks. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 179, Article 117870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2024.117870
  32. Baldwin, W. S., Bain, L. J., Di Giulio, R., Kullman, S., Rice, C. D., Ringwood, A. H. et al. (2020). 20th Pollutant Responses in Marine Organisms (PRIMO 20): Global issues and fundamental mechanisms caused by pollutant stress in marine and freshwater organisms. Aquatic Toxicology, 227, Article 105620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2020.105620
  33. Yang, W., Bu, Q., Shi, Q., Zhao, R., Huang, H., Yang, L. et al. (2024). Emerging contaminants in the effluent of wastewater should be regulated: Which and to what extent? Toxics, 12(5), Article 309. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics12050309
  34. Wu, M., Miao, J., Zhang, W., Wang, Q., Sun, C., Wang, L. et al. (2024). Occurrence, distribution, and health risk assessment of pyrethroid and neonicotinoid insecticides in aquatic products of China. Science of the Total Environment, 919, Article 170880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.170880
  35. Jesus, A., Sousa, E., Cruz, M., Cidade, H., Lobo, J., Almeida, I. (2022). UV filters: Challenges and prospects. Pharmaceuticals, 15(3), Article 263. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph15030263
  36. Santonocito, M., Salerno, B., Trombini, C., Tonini, F., Pintado-Herrera, M. G., Martínez-Rodríguez, G. et al. (2020). Stress under the sun: Effects of exposure to low concentrations of UV-filter 4-methylbenzylidene camphor (4-MBC) in a marine bivalve filter feeder, the Manila clam Ruditapes philippinarum. Aquatic Toxicology, 221, Article 105418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2020.105418
  37. Wang, F., Xiang, L., Sze-Yin Leung, K., Elsner, M., Zhang, Y., Guo, Y. et al. (2024). Emerging contaminants: a One Health perspective. The Innovation, 5(4), Article 100612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xinn.2024.100612
  38. Tierney, K. B., Pyle, G. G. (2024). Is salmonid migration at risk from chemical information disruption? Aquaculture and Fisheries, 9(3), 378–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aaf.2023.05.009
  39. Mohanty, B., Mohanty, S., Mitra, T., Mahanty, A., Ganguly, S., Singh, S. (2019). Omics Technology in Fisheries and Aquaculture. Chapter in a book: Advances in Fish Research. Vol.-VII. Narendra Publishing House, Delhi, India. 2019.
  40. Ulucan-Altuntas, K., Manav-Demir, N., Ilhan, F., Gelgor, H. B., Huddersman, K., Tiwary, A. et al. (2023). Emerging pollutants removal in full-scale biological treatment plants: a case study. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 51, Article 103336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2022.103336
  41. Hopkins, Z. R., Blaney, L. (2016). An aggregate analysis of personal care products in the environment: Identifying the distribution of environmentally-relevant concentrations. Environment International, 92–93, 301–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2016.04.026
  42. Du, B., Lofton, J. M., Peter, K. T., Gipe, A. D., James, C. A., McIntyre, J. K. et al. (2017). Development of suspect and non-target screening methods for detection of organic contaminants in highway runoff and fish tissue with high-resolution time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Environmental Sciences: Processes and Impacts, 19(9), 1185–1196. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7EM00243B
  43. Tian, Z., Zhao, H., Peter, K. T., Gonzalez, M., Wetzel, J., Wu, C. et al. (2021). A ubiquitous tire rubber-derived chemical induces acute mortality in coho salmon. Science, 371(6525), 185–189. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abd6951 Erratum in: Science. (2022), 375(6582), Article 5785. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abo5785
  44. Kazmi, S. S. U. H., Xu, Q., Tayyab, M., Pastorino, P., Barcelò, D., Yaseen, Z. M. et al. (2024). Navigating the environmental dynamics, toxicity to aquatic organisms and human associated risks of an emerging tire wear contaminant 6PPD quinone. Environmental Pollution, 356, Article 124313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2024.124313
  45. Ihenetu, S. C., Xu, Q., Khan, Z. H., Kazmi, S. S. U. H., Ding, J. et al. (2024). Environmental fate of tire-rubber related pollutants 6PPD and 6PPD-Q: A review. Environmental Research, 258, Article 119492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2024.119492
  46. French, B. F., Baldwin, D. H., Cameron, J., Prat, J., King, K., Davis, J. W. et al. (2022). Urban roadway runoff is lethal to Juvenile Coho, Steelhead, and Chinook Salmonids, but not Congeneric Sockeye. Environmental Science and Technology Letters, 9(9), 733–738. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.2c00467
  47. Blair, S. I., Barlow, C. H., McIntyre, J. K. (2021). Acute cerebrovascular effects in juvenile coho salmon exposed to roadway runoff. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 78(2), 103–109. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfas-2020-0240
  48. Meador, J. P., Ball, S. C., Andrew, J. C., McIntyre, J. K. (2024). Exposure of juvenile Chinook salmon to effluent from a large urban wastewater treatment plant. Part 2. Metabolomic profiling. Aquaculture and Fisheries, 9(3), 367–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aaf.2023.06.008
  49. Ball, S. C., Meador, J. P., Andrew, J. C., McIntyre, J. K. (2024). Exposure of juvenile Chinook salmon to effluent from a large urban wastewater treatment plant. Part 1. physiological responses. Aquaculture and Fisheries, 9(3), 355–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aaf.2023.06.006
  50. Young, W., Wiggins, S., Limm, W., Fisher, C. M., DeJager, L., Genualdi S. (2022). Analysis of per- and poly(fluoroalkyl) substances (PFASs) in highly consumed seafood products from U.S. markets. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 70(42), 13545–13553. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.2c04673
  51. Bedi, M., Sapozhnikova, Y., Taylor, R. B., Ng, C. (2023). Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) measured in seafood from a cross-section of retail stores in the United States. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 459, Article 132062. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.132062
  52. Habib, Z., Song, M., Ikram, S., Zahra, Z. (2024). Overview of Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). Their applications, sources, and potential impacts on human health. Pollutants, 4, 136–152. https://doi.org/10.3390/pollutants4010009
  53. Sunderland, E. M., Hu, X. C., Dassuncao, C., Tokranov, A. K., Wagner C. C., Allen J. G. (2019). A review of the pathways of human exposure to poly- and perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) and present understanding of health effects. Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology, 29(2), 131–147. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41370-018-0094-1
  54. US EPA. (2024). Per- and poyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS): Proposed PFAS national primary drinking water regulation. Retrieved from https://www.epa.gov/sdwa/and-polyfluoroalkyl-substances-pfas Accessed June 4, 2024.
  55. European Food Safety Authority. (2020). PFAS in food: EFSA assesses risks and sets tolerable intake. Retrieved from https://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/news/pfas-food-efsa-assesses-risks-and-sets-tolerable-intake Accessed June 4, 2024.
  56. Giraudo, M., Douville, M., Letcher, R. J., Houde, M. (2017). Effects of food-borne exposure of juvenile rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) to emerging brominated flame retardants 1,2-bis(2,4,6-tribromophenoxy)ethane and 2-ethylhexyl-2,3,4,5-tetrabromobenzoate. Aquatic Toxicology, 186, 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2017.02.023
  57. Kratschmer, K., Schachtele A., Malisch R., Vetter W. (2019). Chlorinated paraffins (CPs) in salmon sold in southern Germany: Concentrations, homologue patterns and relation to other persistent organic pollutants. Chemosphere, 227, 630–637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.04.016
  58. Conference of the Parties of the Stockholm Convention (COP.8) (2017). Decision SC-8/11 Listing Short-Chain Chlorinated Paraffins (SCCPs) in Annex A of the Convention. Geneva, 74 Retrieved from https://chm.pops.int/theconvention/conferenceoftheparties/meetings/cop8/tabid/5309/default.asp Accessed June 4, 2024.
  59. McIntosh, S., King, T., Wu, D., Hodson, P.V. (2010). Toxicity of dispersed weathered crude oil to early life stages of Atlantic herring (Clupea harengus). Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 29(5), 1160–1167. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.134
  60. Forth, H. P., Rissing, M., Travers, C. (2021). Use of correlated water sample chemistry and synthetic aperture radar footprints to estimate oil concentrations in the upper water column during the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. ACS Earth and Space Chemistry, 5(11), 3097–3103. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.1c00196
  61. Пряжевская, Т. С., Черкашин, С. А. (2007). Влияние нефтеуглеводородов на ранний онтогенез рыб. Известия ТИНРО, 149, 359–365.
  62. Barron, M. G., Carls, M. G., Heintz, R., Rice, S. D. (2004). Evaluation of fish early life-stage toxicity models of chronic embryonic exposures to complex polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon mixtures. Toxicological Sciences, 78(1), 60–67. https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfh051
  63. Monteiro, V., Dias da Silva, D., Martins, M., Guedes de Pinho, P., Pinto, J. (2024). Metabolomics perspectives of the ecotoxicological risks of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: A scoping review. Environmental Research, 249, Article 118394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2024.118394
  64. Takeshita, R., Bursian, S. J., Colegrove, K. M., Collier, T. K., Deak, K., Dean, K. M. et al. (2021). A review of the toxicology of oil in vertebrates: What we have learned following the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health: Part B, Critical Reviews, 24(8), 355–394. https://doi.org/10.1080/10937404.2021.1975182
  65. Pasparakis, C., Esbaugh, A. J., Burggren, W., Grosell, M. (2019). Physiological impacts of Deepwater Horizon oil on fish. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part C: Toxicology and Pharmacology, 224, Article 108558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpc.2019.06.002
  66. Bender, M. L., Giebichenstein, J., Teisrud, R. N., Laurent, J., Frantzen, M., Meador, J. P. et al. (2021). Combined effects of crude oil exposure and warming on eggs and larvae of an arctic forage fish. Scientific Reports, 11(1), Article 8410. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-87932-2
  67. Grosell, M., Pasparakis, C. (2021). Physiological responses of fish to oil spills. Annual Review of Marine Science, 13,137–160. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurevmarine-040120-094802
  68. Meador, J. P., Nahrgang, J. (2019). Characterizing crude oil toxicity to early-life stage fish based on a complex mixture: Are we making unsupported assumptions? Environmental Science and Technology, 53(19), 11080–11092. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b02889
  69. Commission Regulation (EU) 2023/915 on maximum levels for certain contaminants in food and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006. (2023). Official Journal of the European, 119, 103–157. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2023/915/oj Accessed June 3, 2024.
  70. Osman, A. I., Hosny, M., Eltaweil, A. S., Omar, S., Elgarahy, A. M., Farghali, M. et al. (2023). Microplastic sources, formation, toxicity and remediation: A review. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 21(4), 2129–2169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-023-01593-3
  71. Kibria, G. (2023). Impacts of microplastic on fisheries and seafood security — Global analysis and synthesis. Science of the Total Environment, 904, Article 166652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166652
  72. Oza, J., Rabari, V., Yadav, V. K., Sahoo, D. K., Patel, A., Trivedi, J. (2024). A systematic review on microplastic contamination in fishes of Asia: Polymeric risk assessment and future prospectives. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 43(4), 671–685. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5821
  73. Granby, K., Bhattarai, B., Johannsen, N., Kotterman, M. J. J., Sloth, J. J., Cederberg, T. L. et al. (2024). Microplastics in feed affect the toxicokinetics of persistent halogenated pollutants in Atlantic salmon. Environmental Pollution, 357, Article 124421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2024.124421
  74. EUR-Lex (2008). Directive 2008/56/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008 establishing a framework for community action in the field of marine environmental policy (Marine Strategy Framework Directive). Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32008L0056 Accessed June 4, 2024.
  75. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. (2023). Microplastics. Retrieved from https://marinedebris.noaa.gov/what-marine-debris/microplastics Accessed June 4, 2024.
  76. Gomiero, A., Haave, M., Bjorǿy, Ø., Herzke, D., Kögel, T., Nikiforov, V. et al. (2020). Quantification of microplastic in fillet and organs of farmed and wild salmonids- a comparison of methods for detection and quantification salmodetect. NORCE Report 8–2020 Retrieved from https://www.hi.no/resources/Salmodetect-report-final.pdf Accessed June 3, 2024.
  77. Landrigan, P. J., Raps, H., Cropper, M., Bald, C., Brunner, M., Canonizado, E. M. et al. (2023). The Minderoo-Monaco commission on plastics and human health. Annals of Global Health, 89(1), Article 23. https://doi.org/10.5334/aogh.4056
  78. O’Neill, S. M., Carey, A. J., Harding, L. B., West, J. E., Ylitalo, G. M., Chamberlin, J. W. (2020). Chemical tracers guide identification of the location and source of persistent organic pollutants in juvenile Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha), migrating seaward through an estuary with multiple contaminant inputs. Science of the Total Environment, 712, Article 135516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135516
  79. Donets, M. M., Tsygankov, V. Yu., Gumovskiy, A. N., Gumovskaya, Y. P., Boyarova, M. D., Kulshova, V. I. et al. (2022). Fish as a risk source for human health: OCPs and PCBs in Pacific salmon. Food Control, 134, Article 108696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2021.108696
  80. Cunha, S. C., Trabalón, L., Jacobs, S., Castro, M., Fernandez-Tejedor, M., Granby, K. et al. (2018). UV-filters and musk fragrances in seafood commercialized in Europe Union: Occurrence, risk and exposure assessment. Environmental Research, 161, 399–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2017.11.015
  81. Carrizo, J. C., Griboff, J., Bonansea, R. I., Nimptsch, J., Valdés, M. E., Wunderlin, D. A. et al. (2021). Different antibiotic profiles in wild and farmed Chilean salmonids. Which is the main source for antibiotic in fish? Science of the Total Environment, 800, Article 149516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149516
  82. Undas, A. K., Escher, S., Hahn, S., Hajslova, J., Hrbek, V., Kosek, V. et al. (2024). Screening for emerging chemical risks in the food chain (SCREENER). EFSA Journal, 21(7), Article 8962E. https://doi.org/10.2903/sp.efsa.2024.EN-8962
  83. Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH). Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2006/1907/2014-04-10. Accessed June 3, 2024.
  84. Мильман, Б. Л, Журкович, И. К. (2020). Обобщенные критерии идентификации химических соединений методами хроматографии — масс-спектрометрии. Аналитика и контроль, 24(3), 164–173. https://doi.org/15826/analitika.2020.24.3.003
  85. Мильман, Б. Л., Журкович, И. К. (2022). Современная практика нецелевого химического анализа. Журнал аналитической химии, 77(5), 412–426. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0044450222050085
  86. Gómez-Regalado, M. del C., Martín-Pozo, L., Martín, J., Santos, J. L., Aparicio, I., Alonso, E. et al. (2022). An overview of analytical methods to determine pharmaceutical active compounds in aquatic organisms. Molecules, 27(21), Article 7569. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27217569
  87. Turnipseed, S. B. (2024). Analysis of chemical contaminants in fish using high resolution mass spectrometry — A review. Trends in Environmental Analytical Chemistry, 42, Article e00227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teac.2024.e00227
  88. Chiesa, L. M., Pavlovic, R., Panseri, S., Arioli, F. (2018). Evaluation of parabens and their metabolites in fish and fish products: A comprehensive analytical approach using LC-HRMS. Food Additives and Contaminants: Part A Chemistry, Analysis, Control, Exposure and Risk Assessment, 35(12), 2400–2413. https://doi.org/10.1080/19440049.2018.1544721
  89. Baesu, A., Audet, C., Bayen, S. (2021). Application of non-target analysis to study the thermal transformation of malachite and leucomalachite green in brook trout and shrimp. Current Research in Food Science, 4, 707–715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crfs.2021.09.010
  90. EUR-Lex (2021). Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/808 of 22 March 2021 on the performance of analytical methods for residues of pharmacologically active substances used in food-producing animals and on the interpretation of results as well as on the methods to be used for sampling and repealing Decisions 2002/657/EC and 98/179/EC (Text with EEA relevance). Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_impl/2021/808/oj Accessed June 3, 2024.
  91. Cappello, T. (2020). NMR-Based metabolomics of aquatic organisms. eMagRes, 9(1), 81–100. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470034590.emrstm1604
  92. Lulijwa, R., Alfaro, A. C., Young, T. (2022). Metabolomics in salmonid aquaculture research: Applications and future perspectives. Reviews in Aquaculture, 14(2), 547–577. https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12612
  93. Liu, L., Wu, Q., Miao, X., Fan, T., Meng, Z., Chen, X. et al. (2022). Study on toxicity effects of environmental pollutants based on metabolomics: A review. Chemosphere, 286(2), Article 131815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131815
  94. Wishart, D. S., Cheng, L. L., Copié, V., Edison, A. S., Eghbalnia, H. R., Hoch, J. C. et al. (2020). NMR and metabolomics — a roadmap for the future. Metabolites, 23, 12(8), Article 678. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo1208067

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2024 Abramova L.S., Kozin A.V., Guseva E.S.

Согласие на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика»

1. Я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных»), осуществляя использование сайта https://journals.rcsi.science/ (далее – «Сайт»), подтверждая свою полную дееспособность даю согласие на обработку персональных данных с использованием средств автоматизации Оператору - федеральному государственному бюджетному учреждению «Российский центр научной информации» (РЦНИ), далее – «Оператор», расположенному по адресу: 119991, г. Москва, Ленинский просп., д.32А, со следующими условиями.

2. Категории обрабатываемых данных: файлы «cookies» (куки-файлы). Файлы «cookie» – это небольшой текстовый файл, который веб-сервер может хранить в браузере Пользователя. Данные файлы веб-сервер загружает на устройство Пользователя при посещении им Сайта. При каждом следующем посещении Пользователем Сайта «cookie» файлы отправляются на Сайт Оператора. Данные файлы позволяют Сайту распознавать устройство Пользователя. Содержимое такого файла может как относиться, так и не относиться к персональным данным, в зависимости от того, содержит ли такой файл персональные данные или содержит обезличенные технические данные.

3. Цель обработки персональных данных: анализ пользовательской активности с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика».

4. Категории субъектов персональных данных: все Пользователи Сайта, которые дали согласие на обработку файлов «cookie».

5. Способы обработки: сбор, запись, систематизация, накопление, хранение, уточнение (обновление, изменение), извлечение, использование, передача (доступ, предоставление), блокирование, удаление, уничтожение персональных данных.

6. Срок обработки и хранения: до получения от Субъекта персональных данных требования о прекращении обработки/отзыва согласия.

7. Способ отзыва: заявление об отзыве в письменном виде путём его направления на адрес электронной почты Оператора: info@rcsi.science или путем письменного обращения по юридическому адресу: 119991, г. Москва, Ленинский просп., д.32А

8. Субъект персональных данных вправе запретить своему оборудованию прием этих данных или ограничить прием этих данных. При отказе от получения таких данных или при ограничении приема данных некоторые функции Сайта могут работать некорректно. Субъект персональных данных обязуется сам настроить свое оборудование таким способом, чтобы оно обеспечивало адекватный его желаниям режим работы и уровень защиты данных файлов «cookie», Оператор не предоставляет технологических и правовых консультаций на темы подобного характера.

9. Порядок уничтожения персональных данных при достижении цели их обработки или при наступлении иных законных оснований определяется Оператором в соответствии с законодательством Российской Федерации.

10. Я согласен/согласна квалифицировать в качестве своей простой электронной подписи под настоящим Согласием и под Политикой обработки персональных данных выполнение мною следующего действия на сайте: https://journals.rcsi.science/ нажатие мною на интерфейсе с текстом: «Сайт использует сервис «Яндекс.Метрика» (который использует файлы «cookie») на элемент с текстом «Принять и продолжить».