The Characteristics of Societal Bilingualism in Russia: Why do Tatarstan and Yakutia Stand out?

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Since Russia has always been a multicultural and multilingual country, there are many regions where several official languages (apart from the Russian language) coexist. Needless to say, bilingualism has its own peculiarities in each region. What would be the difference between the linguistic situation in the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) and the Republic of Tatarstan? In the present article, we are aiming to investigate the peculiarities of bilingualism in the two above-mentioned republics. Based on the analysis of the historical background of minority languages and current language policies, the article provides an overview of the linguistic situation in terms of language status and language use of minority languages in the educational system. It has shown that despite similar language policies, the actual situation in Tatarstan and Yakutia is different, especially in terms of preference for learning the minority language at school. It is concluded that it is necessary to develop bilingualism in the regions and organize the necessary methodological support for parents and teachers.

About the authors

Anna Mikhienko

Lomonosov Moscow State University

Email: mikhyenko@gmail.com
Researcher Moscow, Russia

Ekaterina S. Oshchepkova

Lomonosov Moscow State University; Institute of linguistics, Russian Academy of Sciences

Author for correspondence.
Email: oshchepkova_es@iling-ran.ru
PhD in Philology, Researcher, Department of Psychology of Education and Pedagogics, Faculty of Psychology, Lomonosov Moscow State University Moscow, Russia

Maria S. Kovyazina

Lomonosov Moscow State University

Email: oshchepkova_es@iling-ran.ru

Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Education, Doctor of Psychology, Professor of the Department of Neuro- and Pathopsychology, Faculty of Psychology

Moscow, Russia

References

  1. Zarate, G., D. Levy, and Kramsch, C. 2011. Handbook of Multilingualism and Multiculturalism. Paris: Archive Contam. Print.
  2. Hornberger, N., and S. McKay. 2010. Sociolinguistics and Language Education. Bristol, Blue Ridge Summit: Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847692849 Institute of Multilingualism Home Page. Available online: https://centre-plurilinguisme.ch/en
  3. Edwards, J. 2007. Societal Multilingualism. Reality, Recognition and Response. In: Handbook of Multilingualism and Multilingual Communication. Ed. by Peter Auer, Li Wei. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Print.
  4. Simons, G.F., and C.D. Fennig (eds.) 2017. Ethnologue: Languages of the World, Twentieth edition. Dallas, Texas: SIL International. Print.
  5. Skutnabb-Kangas, T., and T. McCarty. 2008. Key Concepts in Bilingual Education: Ideological, Historical, Epistemological, and Empirical Foundations. Web. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-30424-3_112
  6. Jankiewicz, S., and N. Knyaginina. 2018. The Language of the Republic at School: Who Decides? SSRN Electronic Journal. Web. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3163596
  7. Jankiewicz, S., N. Knyaginina, and Prina, F. 2020. Linguistic Rights and Education in the Republics of the Russian Federation: Towards Unity through Uniformity, Review of Central and East European Law 45 (1): 59-91. doi: https://doi.org/10.1163/15730352-bja10003
  8. Hattori, S. 1979. The Place of Tatar among the Turkic Languages. Harvard Ukrainian Studies 3/4: 383-393. Web. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41035840
  9. Johanson, L. 2006. Tatar. In K. Brown (Ed.). Encyclopaedia of Language and Linguistics. 2nd Edition. Oxford: Elsevier. Print.
  10. Slavina, L., J. Mustafina, and Alan, M. 2017. Regional languages in cyberspace Case study: Tatarstan, Russia.Web.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321420076_Regional_languages_in_cyberspace_Case_study_Tatarstan_Russia
  11. Marquardt, K.L. 2013. Language and Sovereignty: A Comparative Analysis of Language Policy in Tatarstan and Kazakhstan. 4. Los Angeles, CA: UCLA Asia Institute. http://www1.international.ucla.edu/media/files/Marquardt_PoCA_4-fj-lrh.pdf
  12. Wigglesworth-Baker, T. 2016. Language Policy and Post-Soviet Identities in Tatarstan. Nationalities Papers 44 (1): 20-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/00905992.2015.1046425
  13. Suleymanova, D. 2009. Language Situation in the Republic of Tatarstan. Info Islam 1-16. http://www.info-islam.ru/publ/statji/jazykovaja_situacija_v_respublike_tatarstan/5-1-0-11281
  14. Graney, K. 2007. Making Russia Multicultural Kazan at Its Millennium and Beyond. Problems of post-communism 54 (6): 17-27. Print.
  15. Nizamova, L.R. 2016. Ethnic Tatars in contention for recognition and autonomy: bilingualism and pluri-cultural education policies in Tatarstan, Nationalities Papers 44 (1): 71-91. https://doi.org/10.1080/00905992.2015.1124076
  16. Gorenburg, D. 2005. Tatar Language Policies in Comparative Perspective: Why Some Revivals Fail and Some Succeed. Ab Imperio 257-284. Web. 10.1353/imp.2005.0023.
  17. Minzaripov, R.G. 2013. Ethnicity and Migrations in Modern Tatarstan. Kazanʹ: Magarif publ. Print. (In Russ.).
  18. Iskhakova, Z., R. Musina, and Minullin, K. 2002. Language and ethnicity at the turn of the century. Kazan: Magarif publ. Print. (In Russ.).
  19. Kuzmin, E. 2014. Multilingualism in Russia. In: Linguistic and Cultural Diversity in Cyberspace. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference (Yakutsk, Russian Federation, 30 June - 3 July, 2014). Moscow: Interregional Library Cooperation Centre, 2015, p. 30-42. Available at: < http://www.ifapcom.ru/files/2015/khanty/yak_mling_2015.pdf>
  20. Ufimtseva, N.V. 2020. Association-verbal network as a model of the linguistic picture of the world. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences 86: 169. Print. (In Russ.).
  21. Grosjean, F. 2015. Bicultural bilinguals. International Journal of Bilingualism 19 (5): 572-586. Print.
  22. Veinguer, A., and H. Davis. 2007. Building a Tatar elite: Language and national schooling in Kazan. Ethnicities 7 (2):186-207. Web. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23889434
  23. Haarmann, H. 1986. Language in Ethnicity: A View of Basic Ecological Relations. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Print.
  24. Tovar-García, E.D., and E. Podmazin. 2018. The impact of socioeconomic status and population size on the use of the Tatar language at home. Intercultural Education 29 (1): 122-138. https://doi.org/10.1080/14675986.2017.1404740
  25. Bayramova, L.K. 2001. Tatarstan: language symmetry and asymmetry. Kazan: Izd-vo Kazan. un-ta publ. Print. (In Russ.).
  26. Bhatia, T., and W. Ritchie. 2006. The handbook of bilingualism. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. Print.
  27. Alòs i Font, H., and E.D. Tovar-García. 2015. Factors affecting the knowledge of the chuvash language amongst school students in Russia. Sociolinguistic Studies 9 (4): 345-372. https://doi.org/10.1558/sols.v9i4.26771.
  28. Tishkov, V., V. Stepanov V., Funk, D., and O. Artemenko. 2009. Status of and Support for Linguistic Diversity in The Russian Federation. Expert report. Moscow: Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Available at: https://refdb.ru/look/1274797.html
  29. Álvarez Veinguer, A. 2013. Mutual Understanding in Tatarstan? Teachers’ and Pupils’ Attitudes to Tatar and Russian in Tatar and Non-Tatar Gymnásias. Pragmatics and Society 4 (2): 240-257. https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.4.2.07alv.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).