Email this article Comparative analysis of the public and national domain: civil and legal aspect
- Authors: Bibarov-Gosudarev A.P.1,2
-
Affiliations:
- Derzhavin Tambov State University
- Tambov Regional Department of All-Russian Non-Governmental Organization “Association of Lawyers of Russia”
- Issue: Vol 3, No 12 (2019)
- Pages: 530-539
- Section: Материальное право
- URL: https://ogarev-online.ru/2587-9340/article/view/370188
- ID: 370188
Cite item
Abstract
We analyze the concepts of public and national domain. We pay special attention to determining the public domain place in the system of intellectual property. We formulate the main approaches to the results of human intellectual work in order to determine the relevance of works of science, literature, art to the public domain. We study the tools for identifying objects of the national domain in the public domain. It is proved that a proprietary approach to intellectual property right fits into the concept of national domain. We define an exception – the identification of the creator’s right to a specific intellectual result should be slightly limited in time or should not occur at all. We note that the concept of national domain took a lot from the proprietary concept, while it does not apply to individuals, but applies to the whole people. We substantiate the position that the proprietary approach can be applied in the national domain theory only to the extent that it does not limit the title of a nation (people) in relation to certain objects of intellectual right. We identify weaknesses and strengths of intellectual property norms implementation in other branches of legislation, as well as civil and legal relations. At the same time, we pay special attention to the national domain institution, taking into account its comparative characteristics with the public domain and the results of the intellectual work of the most talented members of society.
About the authors
Anton Petrovich Bibarov-Gosudarev
Derzhavin Tambov State University; Tambov Regional Department of All-Russian Non-Governmental Organization “Association of Lawyers of Russia”
Author for correspondence.
Email: bibarov@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1504-0203
Senior Lecturer of Civil Law Department of Law and National Security Institute; Executive Director, Member of Executive Committee
Russian Federation, 33 Internatsionalnaya St., Tambov 392000, Russian Federation; 181b Sovetskaya St., Tambov 392008, Russian FederationReferences
- Kazannik A.I. Narod kak sub”yekt konstitutsionno-pravovykh otnosheniy [People as a subject of constitutional law relations]. Konstitutsionnoye i munitsipal’noye pravo – Constitutional and Municipal Law, 2016, no. 2, pp. 3-6. (In Russian).
- Petukhova E.P. Konstitutsionno-pravovoy rezhim natsional’nogo dostoyaniya [Constitutional and legal regime of national domain]. Zbirka tez naukovih dopovidej i povidomlenь miždunarodnoj naukovoï konferenciiï molodih učenih, aspirantiv i studentiv «Verhovenstvo prava âk osnova sučasnogo konstitucionalizmu. 6 Todikovski čitannâ» [Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference of Young Scientists, Post-Graduate Students and Students “Rule of Law as the Basis of Modern Constitutionalism. 6th Todikovski Readings]. Kharkiv, Prava lyudini Publ., 2013, pp. 47-48. (In Ukrainian).
- Sosna S.A. O kontseptsii obshchestvennogo dostoyaniya [On the concept of the public domain]. Gosudarstvo i pravo – State and Law, 1996, no. 2, pp. 55-64. (In Russian).
- Sudarikov S.A. (ed.). Avtorskoye pravo i smezhnyye prava. Zakony, konventsii, dogovory i soglasheniya [Copyright and Related Rights. Laws, Conventions, Contracts and Agreements]. Minsk, Peyto Publ., 1998, 362 p. (In Russian).
- Yuryeva T.V. Intellektual’naya sfera i predprinimatel’stvo. Nepribyl’nyy sektor (Al’ternativa biznesu i gosudarstvu) [Intellectual Sphere and Entrepreneurship. Non-Profit Sector (Alternative to Business and Government)]. Moscow, 1994. (In Russian).
- Mishin Y.D. Osobennosti okhrany intellektual’noy sobstvennosti, yavlyayushcheysya natsional’nym dostoyaniyem rossiyskogo gosudarstva [Features of the intellectual property protection, which is a national domain of the Russian state]. Pravo i zhizn’ – Law and Life, 2001, no. 43, pp. 64-71. (In Russian).
- Keyzerov N.M. Dukhovnoye imushchestvo kak kompleksnaya problema [Spiritual property as a complex problem]. Obshchestvennyye nauki i sovremennost’ – Social Sciences and Contemporary World, 1992, no. 4, pp. 14-19. (In Russian).
- Nikitin A.V., Pronina E.N. Kul’turnoye dostoyaniye kak yuridicheskoye sostoyaniye i kategoriya [Cultural domain as a legal state and category]. Aktual’nyye problemy teorii i istorii pravovoy sistemy obshchestva. Vyp. 10 [Current Problems of the Theory and History of Legal System of Society. Issue 10]. Yaroslavl, 2010, pp. 91-115. (In Russian).
- Skryl S.M. Konstitutsionno-pravovoy mekhanizm ogranicheniya prava sobstvennosti v sisteme soglasovaniya publichnykh i chastnykh interesov [Constitutional legal mechanism for restricting property rights in the system of coordination of public and private interests]. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Pravo [Chelyabinsk State University Bulletin. Series: Law], 2008, vol. 17, no. 31 (132), pp. 74-78. (In Russian).
- Sukhanov E.A. Lektsii o prave sobstvennosti [Lectures on Property Right]. Moscow, Yuridicheskaya literatura Publ., 1991, 239 p. (In Russian).
- Sukhanov E.A. (executive ed.). Rossiyskoye grazhdanskoye pravo: v 2 t. T. 1. Obshchaya chast’. Veshchnoye pravo. Nasledstvennoye pravo. Intellektual’nyye prava. Lichnyye neimushchestvennyye prava [Russian Civil Law: in 2 vols. Vol. 1. General Part. Property Law. Inheritance Law. Intellectual Rights. Personal Non-Property Rights]. Moscow, Statut Publ., 2011, 961 p. (In Russian).
Supplementary files
