Russian society and the challenges of the time: the decade 2014–2024 (New Research by the Institute of Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences)

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

This article analyzes the results of a sociological monitoring study conducted by the Institute of Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, which is the subject of the eighth book in the «Russian Society and the Challenges of the Times» series. The book's relevance is particularly emphasized, as it examines the state of Russian society during a challenging period—2014–2024. The book analyzes changes over the past decade in both the material well-being of the general population and the dynamics of its ideological preferences. While noting some positive dynamics in respondents' responses in 2024, the authors nevertheless suggest a cautious approach and caution against any significant positive shifts in either the material or ideological spheres. Moreover, the improvement in material well-being itself suggests that by 2024, the population has more or less managed to adapt to the new situation, but their attitude toward it is rather stoic. In other words, the country remains characterized by the dominance of «survival values». A no less contradictory and complex picture is revealed in the study of ideological and value preferences. The features of the ideological segmentation of the general population and its evolution are demonstrated. It is particularly noted that even within the core ideological majority that supports the country's current course, there is no unity. The study reveals fragmentation within both the ideological majority and minority, suggesting risks to the country's social consolidation stemming from the ideological sphere. The article offers several hypotheses related to both the growing number of individuals with individualistic orientations and the dangers of transforming views on the specific nature of domestic socioeconomic development into the mythological ideologeme of a «special path».

About the authors

Natalya Pliskevich

Institute of economics of the Russian Academy of sciences

Author for correspondence.
Email: znplis@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0860-6229

Senior Researcher

Russian Federation, 32 Nakhimovskiy Prospekt, Moscow, Russia 117218

References

  1. Berlin I. (2014). Two Concepts of Liberty.
  2. Diligenskiy G.G. (1997). Russian archetypes and modernity.
  3. Dubin B. (2018). The Mythologem of Sonderweg in the Public Opinion of Modern Russia.
  4. Inglehart R., Welzel C. (2005). Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy: the Human Development Sequence.
  5. Coleman J. (2001). Social Capital in the Creation of Human.
  6. Loginov D., Maleva T. (2025). Inflation, cost saving and Online Purchase: Consumption Behavior of Russians in the First Half of 2020th. doi: 10.52342/2587-7666VTE_2025_3_144_158.
  7. Losev A.F. (2025). Dialectics of Myth.
  8. Magun V.S.(2023). Evolution of basic values of the Russian population, 2006 – 2021. doi: 10.31857/5013216250029336-2
  9. Magun V., Rudnev M. (2021). Beyond the «Soviet Man»: Russians in the European Value Typology.
  10. Magyr B, Madlovics B. (2022). The anatomy of post-communist regimes. A conceptual framework. In 2 vols.
  11. Pliskevich N. (2019). Sonderweg: Myths, Reality and the Search for a Way Out. doi: 10.17323/1811-038X-2019-28-2-42-62
  12. Pliskevich N. M. (2022). Institutional Scars in “Frontier” Societies and the Evolution of Human Potential (Part 1. Institutional Scars). doi: 10.52342/2587-7666VTE_2022_3_130_143
  13. Pliskevich N. M. (2023). Institutional Scars in “Frontier” Societies (Part 2. Institutional Scars in the History of Russian Transformation and Changes in Value Orientations). doi: 10.52342/2587-7666VTE_2023_1_60_82
  14. Polterovich V.M. (2007). Elements of the theory of reforms.
  15. Radaev V.V. (2002). The concept of capital, forms of capital and their conversion.
  16. Russian Society and the Challenges of the Time. Book Eight (2025).
  17. Tikhonova N.Ye. (2011). Dynamics of the normative-value system of the Russian society (1995-2010).
  18. Shemyakin Ya.G. (2014). Subecumens and «frontier» civilizations in a comparative historical perspective: on the nature of the correlation of Language, Text and Font.
  19. Shkaratan O.I. (2009). Socioeconomic inequality and its reproduction in modern Russia.
  20. Putnam R. (1996). Who Killed Civic America? // Prospect. March. Pp.66-72.
  21. Schwarts S.H. (2006). Les valeurs de base de la personne: théorie, mesures et applications // Revue franҫaise de sociologie. Vol. 47. No.4. Pp. 929-968.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

 

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).