Factors of Territorial Electoral Differentiation in the Republic of Korea in 2012–2022
- Authors: Chernetskii F.M.1, Krsmanovich M.2
-
Affiliations:
- Lomonosov Moscow State University
- Independent researcher
- Issue: Vol 89, No 5 (2025)
- Pages: 716–730
- Section: ТЕРРИТОРИАЛЬНАЯ ОРГАНИЗАЦИЯ ОБЩЕСТВА
- URL: https://ogarev-online.ru/2587-5566/article/view/375921
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.7868/S2658697525050036
- ID: 375921
Cite item
Abstract
The key factor determining the electoral geography of the Republic of Korea is political regionalism. This regionalism is based on the history of economic development in the country. Regionalism manifests itself in increased or decreased support for politicians in different regions. Differences in political contexts between certain regions can be seen as differences in regional political cultures, leading to completely different electoral splits in each culture. The regional factor greatly complicates the compositional analysis, which involves using statistical methods to examine the relationship between voter behavior and socioeconomic characteristics. In this study, we adapted these methods to the Korean. There is a significant regional variation in how factors affect dependent variables. For major parties and candidates, the selected factors’ impact on their electoral geography varies from region to region. The Jeolla region is particularly notable, as it is more prone to regionalism. In this region, the socio-demographic factors do not practically explain the electoral geography of the main political parties. As in some other regions the compositional approach cannot be applied due to the contextual factors’ influence. Parties gain increased support not in regions with a specific socio-demographic profile, but rather in the politicians’ “home districts.” For example, the support for the regionalist party in Chungcheong is mainly due to the distance from the leaders’ birthplaces. However, most of the variance in the dependent variables within the region is a result of socio-demographic factors.
About the authors
F. M. Chernetskii
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Email: fedor.mche@gmail.com
Faculty of Geography Moscow, Russia
M. Krsmanovich
Independent researcher
Author for correspondence.
Email: fedor.mche@gmail.com
Independent Researcher
Russian Federation, Moscow, RussiaReferences
- Коргунюк Ю.Г. Региональная карта электоральных размежеваний по итогам выборов 2011 года // Полития: Анализ. Хроника. Прогноз. 2014. Т. 74. № 3. С. 75–91.
- Чернецкий Ф.М. Gangnam style: роль локальной идентичности в электоральном поведении жителей Каннама (Сеул) // Городские исследования и практики. 2022. Т. 7. № 2. С. 71–86. https://doi.org/10.17323/usp72202271-86
- Чернецкий Ф.М. Регионализм как ключевой фактор в электоральных процессах в Республике Корея // Вестн. Рос. корееведения. 2022. № 13. С. 67–81.
- Туровский Р.Ф. Региональное измерение электорального процесса // Общественные науки и современность. 2006. № 5. С. 1–20.
- Chernetskii F.M. “Our Local President”: Friends and Neighbors Effect in the Presidential Elections in the Republic of Korea // Korea J. 2024. Vol. 64. № 3. P. 95–125. https://doi.org/10.25024/kj.2024.64.3.95
- de Azevedo D.A. The need for electoral geography: the possibilities in the field // Geousp. 2023. Vol. 27. № 2. P. 1–25. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2179-0892.geousp.2023.204649.en
- Gimm D.W. Fracturing Hegemony: Regionalism and State Rescaling in South Korea, 1961–71 // Int. J. of Urban and Regional Res. 2013. Vol. 37. № 4. P. 1147–1167. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12002
- Kang W.C. Local economic voting and residence-based regionalism in South Korea: evidence from the 2007 presidential election // J. of East Asian Studies. 2016. Vol. 16. № 3. P. 349–369. https://doi.org/10.1017/jea.2016.19
- Kim W.B. Regionalism: Its origins and substance with competition and exclusion // Korea J. 2003. Vol. 43. № 2. P. 5–31.
- Kwon H.Y. A dynamic analysis of partisan voting: The issue salience effect of unemployment in South Korea // Electoral Studies. 2008. Vol. 27. № 3. P. 518–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2008.01.006
- Lee H.C., Repkine A. Changes in and continuity of regionalism in South Korea: A spatial analysis of the 2017 presidential election // Asian Survey. 2020. Vol. 60. № 3. P. 417–440. https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2020.60.3.417
- Lee Y., You J. Is Class Voting Emergent in Korea? // J. of East Asian Studies. 2019. Vol. 19. № 2. P. 197–213. https://doi.org/10.1017/jea.2019.10
- Park J. The Conservatization of the 386 Generation: Cohort Effects in Voting Behavior of a Political Generation in South Korea. Durham: Duke Univ., 2011. 63 p.
- Park W. Ecological Inference and Aggregate Analysis of Elections. PhD theses. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan, 2008. 131 p.
- Raos V. Age, Class, and Territory: Voting Patterns at the 2021 German Federal Election // Političke analize: Tromjesečnik za hrvatsku i međunarodnu politiku. 2021. Vol. 10. № 40. P. 9–15.
- Suchánek J., Hasman J. Nativist with (out) a cause: a geographical analysis of the populist radical right in the 2017 and 2021 Czech parliamentary elections // Territory, Politics, Governance. 2022. Vol. 12. № 10. P. 1563–1584. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2022.2150287
- Taylor P.J., Johnston R. Geography of Elections. London: Routledge, 1979. 530 p.
- Yea S. Maps of resistance and geographies of dissent in the Cholla region of South Korea // Korean Studies. 2000. Vol. 24. № 1. P. 69–93. https://doi.org/10.1353/ks.2000.0020
- 김욱, 유재일, 유병선 [Ким Ук, Ю Джэиль, Ю Бёнсон]. 충청 지역 정치의 최근 변화와 충청 지역주의 [Недавние изменения в чхунчхонской политике и чхунчхонский регионализм] // 비교민주주의연구 [Сравнительные демократические исследования]. 2015. Vol. 11. № 2. P. 45–75. (На кор.).
- 김진하 [Ким Джинха]. 한국 지역주의의 변화: 투표행태와 정당을 중심으로 [Изменение корейского регионализма: фокус на электоральном поведении и политических партиях] // 현대정치연구 [Современные политические исследования]. 2010. Vol. 3. № 2. P. 89–114. (На кор.).
Supplementary files

