The Significance and Meaningful Specificity of the Basic Value of “Love”: Experimental Research
- 作者: Stepykin N.I.1,2
-
隶属关系:
- National Research University “Moscow Power Engineering Institute”
- Moscow State Linguistic University
- 期: 编号 8(902) (2025)
- 页面: 28-34
- 栏目: Linguistics
- URL: https://ogarev-online.ru/2542-2197/article/view/309180
- ID: 309180
如何引用文章
全文:
详细
The paper is devoted to identifying the degree of significance and psychologically relevant content of the value of “love”. The study is based on a specially designed complex experimental procedure which includes a survey, ranking and a free association test. According to the survey, love is the third basic value in the list of 35 names. The ranking experiment revealed the importance of the value of “love” and confirmed the reliability and validity of the survey results. Analyzing the predication features and the probability of producing speech actions in the association fields of love obtained in the studied cities we came to the conclusion about the relevance of the predication feature “subjects and objects of love” and the convergence in the content of such values as “love” and “family” in the minds of Russians.
作者简介
Nikolay Stepykin
National Research University “Moscow Power Engineering Institute”; Moscow State Linguistic University
编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: nick1086@mail.ru
Doctor of Philology (Dr. habil.), Associate Professor, Professor of the Department of Foreign Languages, National Research University “Moscow Power Engineering Institute”; Leading Researcher at the Laboratory of Psycholinguistics, Moscow State Linguistic University
俄罗斯联邦参考
- Pishchalnikova, V. A. (2019). Interpretation of associative data as a methodogical issue of psycholinguistics. Russian Journal of Linguistics, 23(3), 749–761. doi: 10.22363/2312-9182-2019-23-3-749-761. (In Russ.)
- Pishchalnikova, V. A. (2020). Basic values: methodological problems of psycholinguistic research. Vestnik of Moscow State Linguistic University. Humanities, 3(832), 20–35. (In Russ.)
- Stepykin, N. I. (2024). Number of mediators and association mediated strength as parameters of speech action analysis. Ethnopsycholinguistics, 3(18), 46-55. doi: 10.31249/epl/2024.03.03. (In Russ.)
- Ladosha, O. M. Khlopova, A. I. (2021). “Wahrheit” Basic Concept Model in German Linguoculture. Bulletin of the Adygea State University. Series 2: Philology and Art Criticism, 1(272), 67-78. (In Russ.)
- Khlopova, A. I., Ladosha, O. M. (2021). Lexical and semantic content of the “Erfolg” value in German linguistic culture. Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, 7(2), 135–151. doi: 10.22250/24107190_2021_7_2_135_151. (In Russ.)
- Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.
- Ryndina, A. S. (2021). The origins of the theory of values in sociology and directions of its development. RUDN Journal of Sociology, 21(3), 590–609. doi: 10.22363/2313-2272-2021-21-3-590-609. (In Russ.)
- Rohan, M. J. (2000). A rose by any name? The values construct. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 255-277. doi: 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0403_4.
- Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Are there universal aspects in the content and structure of values? Journal of Social Issues, 50, 19–45. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1994.tb01196.x.
- Schwartz, S. H. (2012). An Overview of the Schwartz Theory of Basic Values. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), 11–20. doi: 10.9707/2307-0919.1116.
- Schwartz, S. H., et al. (2012). Refining the theory of basic individual values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(4), 663–688. doi: 10.1037/a0029393.
- Momdzhyan, K. (2015). Universal needs and a generic human essence. Voprosy filosofii, 2, 3–14. (In Russ.)
- Karasik, V. I. (2002). Jazykovoj krug: lichnost’, koncepty, diskurs = Language circle: personality, concepts, discourse. Volgograd: Peremena. (In Russ.)
- Arutyunova, N. D. (1988). Tipy jazykovyh znachenij: Ocenka. Sobytie. Fakt = Types of linguistic meanings: Assessment. Event. Fact. Moscow: Nauka. (In Russ.)
- Butakova, L. O. (2022). Obekty lingvoantropologii v aspekte issledovaniya subyektivnoy semantiki (na primere vozrastnoy variativnosti leksemy lyubov’) = Objects of linguoanthropology in the aspect of the study of subjective semantics (on the example of the age variability of the lexeme ‘love’). In Novejshaja filologija: dinamika rechevyh i tekstovyh form (pp.144–153): collection of scientific articles. Omsk: Omsk State University Publ. (In Russ.)
补充文件
