Email this article 
Notional Agreement in Modern English and Semantics of Compositionality of the Subject
- Authors: Borzilov A.D.1, Sal’kova M.A.1
-
Affiliations:
- Moscow State Linguistic University
- Issue: No 3(871) (2023)
- Pages: 22-29
- Section: Linguistics
- URL: https://ogarev-online.ru/2542-2197/article/view/351997
- ID: 351997
Cite item
Abstract
The article looks into notional agreement and suggests a revised understanding of compositionality as a semantic dominant of the noun-subject in grammatical clauses - representatives of notional agreement. To justify homonymy in some groups of compositional nouns, semantic, contextual and conceptual methods of analysis are employed. The relevance of the study is determined by the lack of consistency and completeness in the present-day grammatical descriptions available.
About the authors
Aleksandr Dmitrievich Borzilov
Moscow State Linguistic University
Author for correspondence.
Email: adborz@mail.ru
Post-graduate Student, Department of English Grammar and History of the English Language, Faculty of the English Language
Russian FederationMarina Alekseevna Sal’kova
Moscow State Linguistic University
Email: smartletters@mail.ru
PhD (Linguistics), Associate Professor, Head of the Department of English Grammar and History of the English Language, Faculty of the English Language
Russian FederationReferences
- Kobrina, N. A., Korneeva, E. A., Ossovskaya, M. I., Guzeeva, K. A. (1999). A grammar of the English language. Morphology. Syntax. A teaching manual for pedagogical institute students and universities with № 2103 “Foreign languages” profile. St. Petersburg: SoJUZ. (In Russ.)
- Krylova, I. P., Gordon, E. M. (2003). A grammar of modern English: A book for foreign language institutes and departments. 9th ed. Moscow: Universitet: Visshaya shkola.
- Barkhudarov, L. S. (2019). The structure of a modern English simple sentence. Moscow: LKI. (In Russ.)
- Close, R. A. (1979). A Reference Grammar for Students of English: Teacher’s manual. Moscow: Prosveschenie.
- Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., Svartvik, J. (1985). A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Pearson Longman.
- Alexander, L. G. (1988). Longman English Grammar. Harlow: Longman Group UK Ltd.
- Alexander, L. G. (1990). Longman English Grammar Practice for intermediate students. Harlow: Longman Group UK Ltd.
- Hewings, M. (2013). Advanced Grammar in Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Swan, M. (2016). Practical English usage. 4th ed. London: Oxford University Press.
- Crystal, D. (30.04.1987). Safety in numbers? English Today. https://www.davidcrystal.com/Files/BooksAndArticles/-3990.pdf
- Veenstra, A., Acheson, D. J. (2016). Semantic integration and subject-verb agreement: Independent effects of notional and grammatical number. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics. https://sites.uclouvain.be/bkl-cbl/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Veenstra-Acheson.pdf
- Kobrina, N. A., Boldirev, N. N., Khudyakov, A. A. (2007). A theoretical grammar of modern English: A teaching manual. Moscow: Visshaya shkola. (In Russ.)
- Kaushanskaya, V. L. [et al.] (2008). A grammar of the English language. A manual for pedagogical institute students. 5th ed., rev. and suppl. Moscow: Airis-press.
Supplementary files
