Email this article 
The Dialogue of Non-Intersecting Semiospheres in a Single Cultural Space
- Authors: Maslova A.V.1
-
Affiliations:
- Moscow State Linguistic University
- Issue: No 4(872) (2023)
- Pages: 163-169
- Section: Cultural studies
- URL: https://ogarev-online.ru/2542-2197/article/view/351983
- ID: 351983
Cite item
Abstract
The article is devoted to the problem of intercultural dialogue and the problem of understanding in the culturologycal and philosophical aspects. The methods of neoanthropology, which proclaimed an ontological turn in the study of the otherness of the Other, and biosemiotics, which extends the semiosphere beyond not only civilization, but humanity as a whole, are applied to the identification of factors of understanding. The article offers a way of overcoming the dual opposition that polarizes the natural and the cultural, immersing consciousness in rigid categories that prevent an understanding dialogue.
Keywords
About the authors
Anastasiya Vladilenovna Maslova
Moscow State Linguistic University
Author for correspondence.
Email: an_maslova@inbox.ru
PhD (Philosophy), Associate Professor at the Department of Philosophy
Russian FederationReferences
- Mukhina, I. K. (2022). Est’ li zhizn’ posle cifry? = Is there life after the digit? Moscow: Konceptual. (In Russ.)
- Epshtejn, M. N. (2019). Budushchee gumanitarnyh nauk = The future of Humanity. Moscow: RIPOL-Klassik. (In Russ.)
- Egorov, V. K. (2020). Again on the "us versus them." Kommunikologiya, 8(1), 138–154. (In Russ.)
- Tisel’ton, E. (2011). Germenevtika = Hermeneutics. Cherkassy: Kollokvium. (In Russ.)
- Vivejrush de Kastru, E. (2022). Who is afraid of the ontological wolf? Some comments on the textual anthropological discussion. Logos, 32(2), 167–192. (In Russ.)
- Pirs, Ch. S. (2000). Nachala pragmatizma = The beginnings of pragmatism. St. Petersburg: Laboratoriya metafizicheskih issledovanij filosofskogo fakul’teta SPbGU; Aletejya. (In Russ.)
- Ostapenko, G. I. (2020). Biokommunikacionnaya paradigma Gyuntera Vitcani: yazyk i kommunikaciya v biologicheskih processah. Method: Moskovskij ezhegodnik trudov iz obshchestvennyh discipilin (Issue 10: Vsled za Dekartom. Ideal’naya chistota i material’naya osnova myshleniya, poznaniya i nauchnyh trudov, pp. 269–287). RAN. INION. Moscow. (In Russ.)
- Kon, E. (2018). Kak myslyat lesa: k antropologii po tu storonu cheloveka = How forests think: towards anthropology on the other side of human. Moscow: Ad Marginem Press. (In Russ.)
- Deskola, F. (2012). Po tu storonu prirody i kul’tury = On the other side of nature and culture. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. (In Russ.)
- Knyazeva, E. N. (2018). Biosemiotics: origins interdisciplinary field. Voprosy filosofii, 11, 86–98. (In Russ.)
- Lotman, M. Yu. (1992). Kul’tura i vzryv = Culture and explosion. Moscow: Gnozis; Progress. (In Russ.)
- Skvorcova, E. L. (2015). Human and society in Watsuji Tetsuro views. Voprosy filosofii, 6, 179–188. (In Russ.)
Supplementary files
