Dialogue of Truth and Interests in Culture

Мұқаба

Дәйексөз келтіру

Толық мәтін

Аннотация

The article is devoted to the consideration of the problems of the correlation of culture and morality through the paradigm of the relationship between truth and lies. The author draws attention to the difficulties in the processes of generating lies and the need to preserve cultural traditions and codes of the triumph of truth. The phenomenon of the dialogue of moral opposites needs to search for an instrumental structure of the universality of intercultural communication in the history of culture and modern reality. Universal and individual stereotypes are formed into planetary processes based on education and upbringing in conditions of dynamic transformations using information capabilities.

Авторлар туралы

Cheslav Dalecky

Moscow State Linguistic University

Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: dcb0059518@mail.ru

Doctor of Philosophy (Dr. habil.), Professor, Director of the Institute of Humanities and Applied Sciences Moscow State Linguistic University

Ресей

Әдебиет тізімі

  1. Kant, I. (1995). Osnovy metafiziki nravstvennosti; Kritika prakticheskogo razuma; Metafizika nravov = Fundamentals of the metaphysics of Morality; Criticism of Practical Reason; Metaphysics of Morals. St. Petersburg: Nauka : St. Petersburg, 1995. (In Russ.)
  2. Arutyunova, N. D. (1995). Istina i jetika = Truth and ethics. In Logicheskij analiz jazyka. Istina i istinnost’ v kul’ture i yazyke (pp. 7–23). Moscow: Nauka. (In Russ.)
  3. Ryabinskaya, T. S. (2015). Fenomen lzhi i obmana v ramkakh etiko-religioznogo podkhoda = The phenomenon of lies and deception in the framework of an ethical and religious approach. Molodoy uchenyy, 13(93), 835–838. https://moluch.ru/archive/93/20667 (In Russ.)
  4. Shatunovskij, I. B. (1991). «Pravda», «Istina», «Iskrennost'», «Pravil'nost'» i «Lozh'» kak pokazateli sootvetstvija / nesootvetstvija soderzhanija predlozhenija mysli i dejstvitel'nosti Logicheskiy analiz yazyka: kul’turn•yye kontsepty = “Truth”, “Truth”, “Sincerity”, “Correctness” and “Falsehood” as indicators of compliance / inconsistency of the content of a sentence with thought and reality. In Arutyunova, N. D. (ed.), Logical analysis of language: cultural concepts. Moscow: Institute of Linguistics RAS. (In Russ.)
  5. Malygina, I. V. (2022). Krizis dialogovykh strategiy v kul’ture postglobal’nogo mira = The crisis of dialogue strategies in the culture of the post-global world. Global’nyy konflikt i kontury novogo mirovogo poryadka (pp. 268–271): XX International Likhachev Scientific Readings, June 9–10, 2022. Saint-Petersburg: Saint-Petersburg University of the Humanities and Social Sciences. (In Russ.)
  6. Mayboroda, D. (2006). Vyzovy i otvety sovremennogo obrazovanija = Challenges and answers of modern education. Nauka i innovatsii. Vyp.18 (44). C. 59-64. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/vyzovy-i-otvety-sovremennogoobrazovaniya/viewer (In Russ.)
  7. Rhodes, V. (2008). Pravila diskussii i ulovki spora = Rules of discussion and tricks of dispute. Moscow: Idea-Press.
  8. Daletsky, Ch. B. (2019). Rhetorical culture and identity in the digitalization context of education. Vestnik of Moscow State Linguistic University, 7(823), 192–205.

Қосымша файлдар

Қосымша файлдар
Әрекет
1. JATS XML


Creative Commons License
Бұл мақала лицензия бойынша қолжетімді Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).