On the Ontology of Digital Sensitivity: Simondon, Latour, and Stiegler on a New Perceptual Grammar
- Authors: Sayapin V.O.1
-
Affiliations:
- Issue: No 12 (2025)
- Pages: 124-145
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://ogarev-online.ru/2454-0757/article/view/367001
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/TVJMIG
- ID: 367001
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
In the era of total digitalization, when artificial neural networks curate our attention and social networks function as machines for producing affects, the question of how we perceive the world takes on not just an academic but a sharply social character. This article proposes a radical ontological shift in understanding the digital age, asserting that the key political field of the 21st century is the very structure of human perception. Through the synthesis of the concepts of technical individuation by Simondon, Stiegler's "pharmacology" of attention, and Latour's actor-network theory, we demonstrate that digital technologies are not merely tools but active co-architects of a new "perceptual grammar." This grammar is a hidden set of rules and filters that determine what can be seen, heard, and felt. It is produced in hybrid networks where algorithms, interfaces, and user practices interweave into a new mode of sensibility that requires its own deconstruction. The novelty of the approach lies in the rejection of viewing technology as a neutral mediator. Hence, the methodological approach of the research is based on the sequential application of three theoretical optics: the concept of individuation (Simondon), actor-network theory (Latour), and the pharmacological approach (Stiegler). This three-tiered method, ascending from ontological justification through empirical tracing to critical evaluation, allows us not only to describe but also to problematize the politics of digital sensitivity in all its complexity. The relevance of this research is determined by the unprecedented challenge that technological platforms pose to human agency and autonomy. If Simondon provides an ontological basis by understanding technology as a condition for the possibility of individuation itself, and Latour serves as a method for empirically tracing the assemblages that produce reality, then Stiegler introduces a critical and political vector. His analysis of the "proletarianization of sensitivity" under the pressure of the attention industry allows us to pose the following central question: "Whose interests and what logics (economic, political, ideological) crystallize in this new perceptual grammar?" Thus, the article insists that the struggle for the future is a struggle for the very "material" of experience and calls for the development of a new "therapeutics" of digital sensitivity capable of resisting its total capitalization.
Keywords
About the authors
Vladislav Olegovich Sayapin
Email: vlad2015@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6588-9192
References
Simondon G. Du mode d’existence des objets techniques. Paris: Aubier, 1958. 266 p. Simondon G. L’individu et sa genèse physico-biologique. Paris: Presses universitaires de France, 1964. 304 p. Simondon G. L'individuation psychique et collective. Paris: Aubier, 1989. 293 p. Simondon G. Gilbert Simondon: une pensée de l'individuation et de la technique. Paris: Albin Michel, 1994. 278 p. Simondon G. L’individuation à la lumière des notions de forme et d’information. Grenoble: Millon, 2005. 571 p. Аршинов В.И., Свирский Я.И. Сложностный мир и его наблюдатель. Ч. 1-я // Философия науки и техники. 2015. № 2. С. 70−84. EDN: VCVPHD Ивахненко Е.Н. Хрупкий мир через оптики простоты и сложности (Ч. 2) // Образовательная политика. 2020. № 4 (84). С. 16-27. Керимов Т.Х., Красавин И.В. Сложность – общая, ограниченная и организованная: проблема, методология и основные понятия // Вестник Гуманитарного университета. 2024. Т. 12. № 2. С. 108-119. doi: 10.35853/vestnik.gu.2024.12-2.06 EDN: WRRJCX Саяпин В.О. Техносоциальная сложностность как проблема индивидуации: взгляд Жильбера Симондона // Философская мысль. 2025. № 7. С. 85-107. doi: 10.25136/2409-8728.2025.7.74957 EDN: CUNGKU URL: https://nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=74957 Стиглер Б. Тревожащая странность мысли и метафизика Пенелопы // Психическая и коллективная индивидуация. М.: ИОИ, 2023. С. 7-24. Stiegler B. Chute et élévation. Apolitique de Simondon // Revue philosophique de la France et de l'étranger. 2006. Vol. 131 (3). P. 325-341. Latour B. We Have Never Been Modern. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA, 1993. 157 p. Latour B. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory. Oxford, UK: Oxford UP, 2005. 312 p. Латур Б. Пастер. Война и мир микробов, с приложением "Несводимого". СПб.: Издательство Европейского университета в Санкт-Петербурге, 2015. 316 с. Латур Б. Об акторно-сетевой теории. Некоторые разъяснения, дополненные еще большими усложнениями // Логос. 2017. Т. 27. № 1. С. 173-200. EDN: WABGMB Latour B. Morality and Technology: The End of the Means // Theory, Culture & Society. 2002. Vol. 19 (5). P. 247-260. doi: 10.1177/026327602761899246 EDN: JTTJMB Писарев А., Астахов А., Гавриленко С. Акторно-сетевая теория: незавершенная сборка // Логос. 2017. № 1. С. 1-40. doi: 10.22394/0869–5377-2017-1-1-34 EDN: YLPVOJ Latour B. On actor-network-theory: A Few Clarifications plus more than a few Complications // Soziale Welt. 1999. No. 47. P. 369-381. Stiegler, B. Technics and time. Part 1. The fault of Epimetheus. Stanford, CT: Stanford University Press, 1998. 316 p. Stiegler, B. Technics and time. Part 2. Stanford, CT: Stanford University Press, 2009. 285 p. Stiegler B. Technics and Time. Part 3. Stanford, CT: Stanford University Press, 2010. 280 p. Stiegler B. For A New Critique of Political Economy. Polity Press, 2010. 154 p. Marcuse H. The Containment of Social Change in Industrial Society // Towards A Critical Theory of Society Routledge. London & New York, 2001. P. 83-94.
Supplementary files
