Technology: metaphors of "machine" and "mechanism" in the history of philosophical thought

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The article is devoted to the study of the concept of "technology" in the history of philosophical thought. The authors have consistently analyzed the psychological, symbolic and socio-cultural factors of influence on the processes of the origin and evolution of technology, which is represented in the history, primarily of classical philosophy, in the form of metaphors of "machine" and "mechanism". This research focus makes it possible to study the interaction of human and technical in a historically and culturally mediated philosophical discourse. In conclusion, a brief overview of the models of representation of technology and the image of a person associated with it as a machine or mechanism dominating in modern information culture is given, epistemological philosophical and natural scientific factors of the functioning of this process are highlighted, and a conclusion is made about the dominant concept of technology as a "supporting structure" of modern culture Using the comparative method, ancient, medieval, and modern concepts of technology, as well as the binary opposition of "man–machine" formed by it, are studied. For the first time, the reconstruction of the concept of technology was carried out through the analysis of socio-cultural discourse in philosophical constructions. The role of these constructions in culture is determined. The authors came to the following conclusions: 1.The genesis of the concept of technology was associated with the understanding of technology as technology, but technology in ancient thought was a broader concept, denoting the totality of artificial human activity represented in technology (specific objects, images) as a means of defining reality. 2.The "supporting structure" of the concept of technology in Western European culture are the metaphors of "machine" and "mechanism", which laid the foundations for understanding man in a post-industrial society. 3.Modern culture can be considered as a technical and technological reality that continues the reconstruction of the metaphor of the "machine" that has developed in the history of philosophical thought.

References

  1. Sternberg R.J. Metaphors of mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
  2. Vallianatos E. G. The antikythera mechanism. The story behind the genius of the Greek computer and its demise. Universal Publishers, 2021.
  3. Платон. Законы. Послезаконие. Письма. СПб.: Наука, 2014.
  4. Diels H., Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker, Berlin: Weidmann, 1903.
  5. Freeman K. 1948, Ancilla to the Pre-Socratic Philosophers (A complete translation of the Fragments in Diels, Fragmente der Vorsokratiker), Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1948.
  6. Schummer J. Aristotle on Technology and Nature // Philosophia Naturalis. Vol. 38, 2001. Pp. 105–120.
  7. Аристотель. Физика. М.: Соцэкгиз, 1937.
  8. Briffault R. Rational Evolution (The Making of Humanity). New York: The Macmillan Company, 1930.
  9. Wiggins D. Sameness and Substance, Oxford: Blackwell, 1980.
  10. Seung S. Connectome. How the brain's wiring makes us who we are. Boston: Mariner Books, 2013.
  11. Степанова И.Н. «Человек-машина» как антропологическая эпистема индустриальной цивилизации // Вестник КГУ, 2009. № 2. C. 43-46.
  12. Boden M. A. Mind as machine. A history of cognitive science. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2008.
  13. Bonner A. Transformation-Based Reactive Systems Development. ARTS 1997. Lecture Notes in Computer Science / M. Bertran, T. Rus. Berlin, Heidelberg : Springer, 1997. Pp. 1-14.
  14. Шилов В. На пути к искусственному интеллекту: Логические ЭВМ и их создатели. М.: Ленанд, 2019.
  15. Fraile A., Panagiotakis E., Christakis N., Acedo L. Cellular Automata and Artificial Brain Dynamics // Mathematical and Computational Applications. 2018. T. 23. № 4. P. 75. https://doi.org/10.3390/mca23040075.
  16. Татаринов Л. П. Параллелизм и направленность эволюции // Эволюция и биоценотические кризисы. - М.: Наука, 1987. С. 124-143.
  17. Кутырёв В. А. Человеческое и иное: борьба миров. Спб.: Алетейя, 2009.
  18. Кутырев В. А. Человечество и Технос: философия коэволюции / В. А. Кутырев, В. В. Слюсарев, Т. М. Хусяинов. СПб.: Алетейя, 2020.
  19. Кутырев В. А. Постчеловеческая революция как результат технологизации человеческого мира // Наука. Мысль: электронный периодический журнал. 2017. Т. 7. № 1-3. С. 45-49.
  20. Беляев Н. Ю. «Механицизм». К проблеме онтологических оснований новоевропейского мышления // Studia Culturae. 2005. № 8. С. 144-162.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).