"Olympic Hope": Fucoldian interpretations
- Authors: Kannykin S.V.1
-
Affiliations:
- Issue: No 9 (2024)
- Pages: 93-112
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://ogarev-online.ru/2454-0757/article/view/366678
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/KDHDRJ
- ID: 366678
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The study of literary works devoted to running makes it possible to determine their plot dominant as a conflict between the feeling of freedom generated by running and such properties of professional sports as fierce competition of competitive activities and authoritarian regulation of the training process. Sociocultural tensions of this kind were fruitfully conceptualized in the works of Michel Foucault using the concepts of bio-power as a unity of anatomical and biopolitics; disciplinary practices as methods of normalization of bodies; supervision and panopticism as means of control, as well as technologies of self and subjectivation aimed at dampening the effects of excessive domination. The article uses the fantastic sports novel by Danish writer Knud Lundberg "Olympic Hope: The Story that Happened at the 1996 Olympic Games" published in 1955 and not translated into Russian as an object of application of the Fucoldian means of analyzing the above conflict situation. The research methodology is based on a conceptual analysis of M. Foucault's theoretical legacy and the reception of the French philosopher's ideas by Russian and Western scientists. The study revealed that the novel presents four variants of bio-power: German (genetic eugenics), American (hormonal eugenics), Soviet (crippling practices) and Danish (based on the free development of natural predisposition), used to organize the birth and training of top-level runners. The disciplinary practices of runner training are most pronounced in totalitarian states. The methods of their implementation are specialized closed training spaces; strict daily routine; daily monotonous running exercises; constant differentiation of athletes by rating; exams in the form of competitions; medical experiments. The realization of the technologies of selfhood and subjectivation by runners is carried out in the forms of resistance and transgression. K. Lundberg associates his Olympic hopes in sports running not with cruel professionals who are ready to give up their health (the problem of doping) and even their lives for the sake of personal awards and increasing the prestige of their states, but with educated means of humanistic sports by amateur athletes, for whom running has existential significance as a way of holistic, bodily and spiritual self-realization in the ethically loaded sphere of freedom.
About the authors
Stanislav Vladimirovich Kannykin
Email: stvk2007@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3250-4276
References
Эпштейн М., Тульчинский Г. Философия тела. Тело свободы. СПб.: Алетейя, 2006. Попова О. В. Тело как территория технологий: от социальной инженерии к этике биотехнологического конструирования. М.: Канон+ РООИ Реабилитация, 2021. Торопова А.А. Философия телесности. М.: Канон+ РООИ Реабилитация, 2024. Sport, Physical Culture and the Moving Body: Materialisms, Technologies, Ecologies / Ed. by Newman J. I., Thorpe Н., Andrews D. L. New Brunswick, New Jersey : Rutgers University Press, 2020. Bale J. Deviance, Doping and Denmark in Knud Lundberg's «The Olympic Hope» // Sport in History. 2009. No. 29:2. Рр. 190-211. doi: 10.1080/17460260902872628 Robinson R. Running in literature: a guide for scholars, readers, runners, joggers and dreamers. Halcottsville, N.Y.: Breakaway Books, 2003. Robinson R. Filling the Unforgiving Minute: The Literature of Running // World Literature Today. 2012. Vol. 86. No. 2. Рр. 24-29. doi: 10.7588/worllitetoda.86.2.002 Tadie А. Running for Freedom: The Politics of Long-Distance Running in Modern Fiction // The International Journal of the History of Sport. 2015. No. 32:2. Pp. 286-298. doi: 10.1080/09523367.2014.967227 Hargreaves J. The Body, Sport and Power Relations // The Sociological Review. 1985. No. 33. Pp. 139-159. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-954x.1985.tb03304.x Фуко М. Воля к истине: по ту сторону знания, власти и сексуальности. М.: Магистериум : Изд. дом "Касталь", 1996. Фуко М. Надзирать и наказывать. Рождение тюрьмы / Пер. с фр. Владимира Наумова под ред. Ирины Борисовой. М.: Ad Marginem, 1999. Фуко М. Рождение биополитики: курс лекций, прочитанных в Коллеж де Франс в 1978-1979 учебном году / Пер. с фр. А. В. Дьякова. СПб.: Наука, 2010. Фуко М. Интеллектуалы и власть: избр. полит. ст., выступления и интервью / Пер. с фр. С. Ч. Офертаса. М.: Праксис. Ч. 3. 2006. Голенков С. И. Понятие субъективации Мишеля Фуко // Вестник Самарской гуманитарной академии. Серия: Философия. Филология. 2007. №1. С. 54-66. Фуко М. Технологии себя // Логос. 2008. № 2 (65). С. 96-122. Makarychev A. & Medvedev S. Doped and disclosed // Politics and the Life Sciences. 2019. No. 38. Рр. 1-12. doi: 10.1017/pls.2019.11 Алкемейер Т. Стройные и упругие: политическая история физической культуры // Логос. 2009. № 6 (73). С. 194-213. Nelson M., Shavitt S. Horizontal and vertical individualism and achievement values. А multimethod examination of Denmark and the United States // Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology. 2002. No. 33. Pp. 439-458. doi: 10.1177/0022022102033005001 Bale J. Running cultures: racing in time and space. London: Routledge, 2003. Фуко M. Нужно защищать общество: курс лекций, прочитанных в Коллеж де Франс в 1975-1976 учебном году. СПб.: Наука, 2005.
Supplementary files
