Rehabilitation of Nazism in Russian Legislation: Historical and Legal Analysis
- Authors: Bagandova L.Z.1
-
Affiliations:
- Issue: No 11 (2023)
- Pages: 51-61
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://ogarev-online.ru/2454-0706/article/view/373008
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.7256/2454-0706.2023.11.68846
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/MGTEEH
- ID: 373008
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The subject of this study is the prerequisites for the development of the rehabilitation of Nazism on the territory of the Russian Federation after the collapse of the USSR, as well as the issues of regulation of this phenomenon in the history of post-Soviet legislation. The author pays special attention to substantiating the reasons for the appearance of followers of Nazism in Russia and notes that the reason for this was the sharp decline in the political, cultural, moral, economic spheres of society in the 1990s, the lack of due attention to the level of education, which affected the general intellectual and spiritual state of Russian youth. It is noted that attempts to stop the development of Nazism on the territory of the state have been repeatedly made. The novelty of the study lies in the fact that it is a comprehensive analysis of the rehabilitation of Nazism as a deviation, where both historical and legal aspects of such a phenomenon are considered. Explanations of the criminalization of the rehabilitation of Nazism, as well as the problems of the considered corpus delicti, are given. The author claims that the appearance of a new legal norm in the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation has not facilitated law enforcement, since due to errors in legal technique and the construction of the norm as a whole, the lack of definitions for a clearer understanding of the actions that make up the objective side of the present corpus delicti, complicates the activities to identify and bring to justice under this norm.
About the authors
Leila Zakirovna Bagandova
Email: leyla.bagandova@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5060-9015
References
Антонян Ю.М. Антинаучные попытки оправдания нацизма в современной России // Российский криминологический взгляд. 2008. № 4. С. 184-188. Баштаникова, Т. А. Алиева. Актуальные проблемы правового регулирования борьбы с реабилитацией нацизма // Преступления против мира: сборник научных трудов / ред. Б. В. Яцеленко. М., 2019. С. 170-174. Молчанов Д.М. Информационная безопасность как приоритетное направление уголовной политики России // Уголовное право. Стратегия развития в XXI веке. Основные направления современной уголовной политики. Москва, 2023 г. № 1. С. 44. Пестерева Ю. С., Пошелов П. В. К вопросу о юридических дефектах статьи 3541 Уголовного кодекса Российской Федерации. // Вестник Омской юридической академии, 2017. Т. 14. № 3. С. 47. Урсул В.И. К вопросу о нацизме в современной России // Армия и общество. 2008. № 3. С. 64-65. Shenfield S.D. The Weimar/Russia Comparison: Reflections on Hanson and Kopstein // Post-Soviet Affairs. 1998. Vol. 14. № 4. P. 355-368.
Supplementary files

