The main models of cross-border data transmission regimes: EU, USA and China

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The subject of this article is the system of regulation of cross-border data flows and its legal regime. Data is a fundamental resource for the development of the digital economy. Today, with the great development of globalization, the presence of cross-border data flows in international trade is inevitable. However, the transfer of data abroad creates hidden threats to the confidentiality of personal information of citizens and national security. Many countries have established data transfer management systems to protect their own interests. Mature data transfer management regimes abroad often become an example for other countries. The adopted laws also served as a model for other countries. The most representative regimes currently exist in the EU, the USA and China, which demonstrate three ways of managing data.  The purpose of this article is to compare the regimes of cross–border data transmission in the European Union, the United States and China in order to analyze the structure of the three representative regimes, as well as to study the causes of their formation and the consequences of their functioning. Considering the three systems makes it possible to show more clearly that the European Union, the United States and China have different value orientations, which directly led to the formation of three different legal systems. The free market and national security have become the main elements of national considerations in the development of laws on cross-border data. Based on the conducted research, it can be concluded that the regime of cross-border data transfer in the EU is the most complete and effective, having a demonstration effect. The Chinese system currently has serious flaws. And in recent years, US law has been increasingly focused on serving the interests of geopolitics. Laws on cross-border data transfer demonstrate trends in political instrumentalization. The Balkanization of the Internet is becoming more and more obvious.

About the authors

Lei zhao

Email: 1651847660@qq.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9108-1007

References

  1. Number of internet and social media users worldwide as of January 2024. URL: https://www.statista.com/statistics/617136/digital-population-worldwide/
  2. Digital trust: How to unleash the trillion-dollar opportunity for our global economy. URL: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2022/08/digital-trust-how-to-unleash-the-trillion-dollar-opportunity-for-our-global-economy/
  3. Jones, C.I., Christopher T. (2020). Nonrivalry and the Economics of Data. American Economic Review, 110 (9), 2819-2958.
  4. Чэнь Б., Ван Б. Правовое регулирование и совершенствование процедуры вывода данных из Китая в рамках принципа суверенитета данных, Журнал Университета Хуацяо (издание философии и социальных наук), 2024, № 2. С. 49-63. (на китайском языке)
  5. General Data Protection Regulation. URL: https://gdpr-info.eu/
  6. Восс, У.Г. Трансграничные потоки данных, общий регламент защиты персональных данных и управление данными // Вестник международных организаций: образование, наука, новая экономика. 2022. Т. 17, № 1. С. 56-95. doi: 10.17323/1996-7845-2022-01-03.
  7. CLOUD Act Resources. URL: https://www.justice.gov/criminal/cloud-act-resources
  8. Лю К.А. Ключевые направления развития наднационального правового регулирования цифрового пространства ЕС на современном этапе // Международное право. 2022. № 1. С. 61-75. doi: 10.25136/2644-5514.2022.1.37674 URL: https://e-notabene.ru/wl/article_37674.html
  9. Regulation (EU) 2022/1925 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 September 2022 on contestable and fair markets in the digital sector and amending Directives (EU) 2019/1937 and (EU) 2020/1828 (Digital Markets Act) (Text with EEA relevance) URL: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32022R1925
  10. Сюн Т., Конг С. Построение механизма глобального управления, основанного на концепции суверенитета данных-вызовы, направления и пути // Журнал региональных и страновых исследований, 2024. № 2. С. 75-90. (на китайском языке)
  11. Е Ч., Янь В. О текущей ситуации, проблемах и путях улучшения трансграничной системы передачи данных в Китае // Журнал Пекинского университета аэронавтики и астронавтики (издание по общественным наукам). 2024. № 1. С. 57-71. (на китайском языке)
  12. Шелепов, А. В. Подходы стран БРИКС к регулированию данных // Вестник международных организаций: образование, наука, новая экономика. 2022. Т. 17, № 3. С. 212-234. doi: 10.17323/1996-7845-2022-03-0

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).