The Biopolitical dimension of the modern macropolitical identity of Russians
- Authors: Belov I.V.1
-
Affiliations:
- Issue: No 1 (2025)
- Pages: 29-42
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://ogarev-online.ru/2454-0684/article/view/368791
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/KCSGJC
- ID: 368791
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The subject of the study is the biopolitical toolkit used by modern Russian elites in the context of building the macropolitical identity of Russians. This process is characterized by a complex nature. The identity policy implemented in the post-Soviet period takes into account the need to strengthen intercultural and interethnic unity in society. In this regard, the construction of a special macropolitical identity takes place not only in the space of memory politics and in the broad sense of symbolic politics, but also in the space of biopolitics. Biopolitics has made it possible to unify the principles of management based on the physiological and social manifestations inherent in humans. Of particular research interest is the problem of using biopolitical methods in the context of building a macropolitical identity, a special form of self–identification that overcomes religious, cultural and ethnic differences in society. In Russia, this process is particularly relevant, since in a multicultural and multiethnic state, the process of building socially shared forms of identity sets the foundation of society. We propose to consider examples of the use of biopolitics in the framework of building this identity. The research methodology includes an analysis of the dynamics of Russian legislation and biopolitical tools, which is revealed by the example of individual cases and political technologies used by political elites in the course of building the macropolitical identity of Russians. The scientific novelty of the research lies in the consideration of the principles and tools of biopolitics through the prism of the macropolitical identity of Russians. It is based on identification with the broader community, which presupposes solidarity across borders related to political and ideological preferences. We examine in detail how modern biopolitics, performed by Russian elites, allows us to overcome these preferences and use the biological essence of a person in solving problems related to the political solidarity of society. Separately, an analysis of legislative norms and practical cases was carried out, which demonstrated the variety of biopolitical tools used in modern Russia. As a result of the research, we come to the conclusion that biopolitics can be effectively used as a measure to counter nationalist tendencies in society. The conclusion is also formulated about the need to introduce bioethics, i.e. the moral dimension of those political and technological processes that are implemented in the political space of modern Russia.
About the authors
Ivan Valentinovich Belov
Email: ivan.belov.2000@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0000-3065-461X
References
Агамбен Д. Homo Sacer. Суверенная власть и голая жизнь. М.: Европа, 2011. 250 с. Фуко М. Воля к истине: по ту сторону знания, власти и сексуальности // Работы разных лет. М.: Касталь, 1996. 448 с. Фуко М. Нужно защищать общество: курс лекций, прочитанных в Коллеж де Франс в 1975–1976 учебном году / пер. с фр. Е.А. Самарской. СПб.: Типография «Наука» РАН, 2005. 312 с. Негри А. Труд множества и ткань биополитики // Синий диван. 2008. № 12. С. 79-92. Мищинина Е.В., Костомаров А.С. Понятие биополитики в критической философии М. Фуко // Вестник молодых ученых и специалистов Самарского университета. 2020. № 2 (17). С. 59-67. Мухина В.С. Уникальный диапазон понятия "Архетип" // Развитие личности. 2014. № 4. С. 163-201. Малинова О.Ю. Cимволическая политика: Контуры проблемного // Символическая политика: Сборник научных трудов. М.: Институт научной информации по общественным наукам РАН. 2012. С. 12. "em"Пантин В.И."/em" Проблемы идентичности и российская модернизация // Поиск национально-цивилизационной идентичности и концепт "особого пути" в российском массовом сознании в контексте модернизации. М.: ИМЭМО РАН, 2004. С. 6-15. Росстат назвал число живущих за чертой бедности россиян // www.vedomosti.ru. URL: https://www.vedomosti.ru/economics/news/2022/06/11/926196-rosstat-nazval (дата обращения: 12.10.2023). Российская идентичность в социологическом измерении // Центр исследований и аналитики Фонда исторической перспективы. URL: https://www.perspektivy.info/misl/cenn/rossijskaja_identichnost_v_sociologicheskom_izmerenii_2008-04-22.htm (дата обращения: 24.02.2025). Новые меры социальной поддержки в 2022 году // www.kommersant.ru. URL: https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/5493765 (дата обращения: 12.10.2023). Granovetter M.S. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Psychology. 78(6). 1973. P. 1360-1380. Asch S.E. Forming impressions of personality // Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology. № 41. 1946. P. 258-290. "em"Brubaker R."/em" Nationalizing States Revisited: Projects and Processes of Nationalization in PostSoviet States. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 2011, vol. 34, no. 11, pp. 1785-1814.
Supplementary files
