Problems of developing students' critical thinking in the context of information society

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The article examines the formation of students' critical thinking in the context of the information society. It discusses the cognitive and behavioral components of critical thinking. Emphasis is placed on identifying factors that hinder the development of students' analytical and reflective abilities in the modern educational environment, including information overload, clip-based perception, multitasking, and the impact of digital distractions. The influence of the digital environment on learners' cognitive processes is analyzed, revealing contradictions between students' information consumption habits and the objectives of professional education. Special attention is given to how the digital transformation of the educational space affects the ways of obtaining, processing, and critically evaluating information. Key issues related to students' inability to adequately assess the credibility of internet content are highlighted, along with systemic reasons for the low level of critical thinking development, supported by the results of international and domestic sociological studies. The work employs methods of theoretical analysis, generalization of scientific literature, a comparative approach, and interpretation of data from domestic and foreign studies, surveys, and pedagogical experiments conducted from 2018 to 2023. The scientific novelty of the article lies in the comprehensive study of modern challenges in the digital educational environment as factors that simultaneously hinder and stimulate the development of critical thinking. The impact of clip-based thinking, information overload, and digital multitasking on students' cognitive activities is substantiated. A typology of effective pedagogical practices that help overcome the negative effects of digitalization is presented. The effectiveness of specific pedagogical approaches—such as project activities, case methods, educational debates, media literacy development, and online discussions—is justified. Practical recommendations for fostering critical thinking are proposed, including the integration of digital technologies into active learning forms, the development of metacognitive skills, and the cultivation of a reflective culture among students. The authors conclude that the development of students' critical thinking requires a systematic revision of the educational paradigm—from a transmissive model to a research-oriented one. Despite the negative influences of the digital environment, it can be utilized as a resource. It is shown that the effectiveness of such methodologies increases with pedagogical support focused on developing independence, media literacy, and the ability to ask questions.

References

  1. Жданова Т.А. Развитие критического мышления студентов в условиях цифровизации высшего образования // Управление образованием: теория и практика. 2024. Т. 14, № 10-1. С. 73-81. doi: 10.25726/c7135-3808-0436-o EDN: OFJTAD.
  2. Кант И. Ответ на вопрос: что такое Просвещение? // Собр. соч. в 8 тт. М.: Чоро, 1994. Т. 8. С. 29-37.
  3. Корешникова Ю.Н. Развитие критического мышления в современном российском обществе: что дает университет? / Мониторинг общественного мнения: экономические и социальные перемены. 2019. № 6. С. 91-110. – URL: https://www.monitoringjournal.ru/index.php/monitoring/article/view/665/735 (дата обращения: 31.03.2025). doi: 10.14515/monitoring.2019.6.06 EDN: QRBGZR.
  4. Милль Дж.С. О свободе. – URL: https://www.civisbook.ru/files/File/Mill_O%20svobode.pdf (дата обращения: 31.03.2025).
  5. Степашкина Е.А., Суходоев А.К., Гужеля Д.Ю. Исследование профиля надпрофессиональных компетенций, востребованных ведущими работодателями при приеме на работу студентов и выпускников университетов и молодых специалистов. М.: НИУ ВШЭ, 2022. – URL: https://ioe.hse.ru/pubs/share/direct/575367055.pdf (дата обращения: 31.03.2025).
  6. Тарасова К.В., Орел Е.А. Измерение критического мышления студентов в открытой онлайн-среде: методология, концептуальная рамка и типология заданий // Вопросы образования. 2022. № 3. С. 187-212. – URL: https://vo.hse.ru/article/view/16128/15328 (дата обращения: 31.03.2025). doi: 10.17323/1814-9545-2022-3-187-212 EDN: SUFXTR.
  7. Чошанов М.А. Дидактика цифровой эпохи: от преподавания к инженерии учения // Информатика и образование. 2018. № 8. С. 53-62. doi: 10.32517/0234-0453-2018-33-9-53-62 EDN: YQHHNB.
  8. Эльбекьян К.С., Пажитнева Е.В., Маркарова Е.В., Муравьева А.Б. Особенности клипового мышления современного студента // Международный журнал прикладных и фундаментальных исследований. 2017. № 4 (часть 1). С. 289-292. EDN: YHGLHT.
  9. Abrami P.C., Bernard R.M., Borokhovski E., Waddington D.I., Wade C.A., Persson T. Strategies for teaching students to think critically: A meta-analysis // Review of Educational Research. 2015. Vol. 85, № 2. Pp. 275-314. – URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281952187_Strategies_for_Teaching_Students_to_Think_Critically_A_Meta-Analysis (дата обращения: 31.03.2025).
  10. Arnold M., Goldschmitt M., Rigotti T. Dealing with information overload: a comprehensive review // Frontiers in Psychology. 2023. Vol. 14. – URL: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1122200/full (дата обращения: 31.03.2025). doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1122200 EDN: RMDVYA.
  11. Dewey J. The School and Society. – URL: http://www.brocku.ca/MeadProject/Dewey/Dewey-1907/Dewey-1907-toc.html (дата обращения: 30.04.2025).
  12. Ennis R.H. Critical Thinking Assessment // Theory into Practice. 1993. Vol. 32. No 3. P. 179-186. – URL: https://2024.sci-hub.se/2147/c6750509db7aca9b1a01bab4815cbecf/ennis1993.pdf (дата обращения: 30.04.2025). EDN: BOESMZ.
  13. Fung D., Howe C. Liberal Studies in Hong Kong: A New Perspective on Critical Thinking through Group Work // Thinking Skills and Creativity. 2012. Vol. 7. No. 2. P. 101-111.
  14. Glaser Edward M. An Experiment in the Development of Critical Thinking // Teacher's College, Columbia University, 1941. – URL: http://www.criticalthinking.org/pages/defining-critical-thinking/766 (дата обращения: 31.03.2025).
  15. Haleem A., Javaid M., Qadri M.A., Suman R. Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review // Sustainable Operations and Computers. 2022. Vol. 3. Pp. 275-285. doi: 10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004 EDN: DHOXXE.
  16. Jackson T.W., Smith S. Retrieving relevant information: traditional file systems versus tagging // Journal of Enterprise Information Management. 2012. Vol. 25. No. 1. Pp. 79-93.
  17. Kostić J.O., Ranđelović K.R. Digital distractions: learning in multitasking environment // Psychological Applications and Trends (InPACT-2022 Conference Proceedings). 2022. Pp. 299-302. – URL: https://inpact-psychologyconference.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/2022inpact070.pdf (дата обращения: 08.04.2025).
  18. Lechner H.A., Squire L.R., Byrne J.H. 100 Years of Consolidation // Learning & Memory. 1999. Vol. 6, № 2. P. 77-87.
  19. Lipman M. Critical thinking: What can it be? Institute of critical thinking. Resource Publication, 1988. 1(1). P. 12.
  20. McGrew S., Breakstone J., Ortega T., Smith M., Wineburg S. Can students evaluate online sources? Learning from assessments of civic online reasoning // Theory and Research in Social Education. 2018. Vol. 46, № 2. Pp. 165-193.
  21. Walker T. Students Still Can't Tell Fact from Fiction on the Internet // NEA Today. 2020. January 6. – URL: https://www.nea.org/nea-today/all-news-articles/students-still-cant-tell-fact-fiction-internet (дата обращения: 08.04.2025).
  22. Yang J., Wu W. Digital storytelling for enhancing student academic achievement, critical thinking, and learning motivation: A year-long experimental study // Computers & Education. 2012. Vol. 59, No. 2. P. 339-352. – URL: http://ehumblewiki.pbworks.com/w/file/fetch/58428931/Yang_Ya-Ting_C.pdf (дата обращения: 31.03.2025).

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).