To the issue of the role classification of participants in bullying situations.

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The object of this study is the role models that can be chosen by the participants of the confrontation in the framework of bullying. It should be noted that the authors of the study consider bullying as a form of pedagogical conflict, which can significantly affect the educational process and mental health of students. The relevance of the study is also revealed through the perception of bullying not just as bullying, but as a conflict, where the parties are involved in a confrontation and have subjectivity. The subject of the research is the social consequences of following behavioral scenarios in conflict. Such consequences are revealed through the result of confrontation, as well as the impact of the result of such confrontation on changes in statuses and positions within the educational environment at different levels, changes in distribution, emergence, change, fragmentation, and disappearance of factions within the educational environment. The methodological basis of this study is the analysis of a wide range of scientific sources: scientific and practical pedagogical, psychological, sociological, conflictology literature, and periodical scientific publications. Among the applied methods of scientific research are: comparison, generalization, and synthesis. In the context of conflict methodology, this work is built around the theory of conflict functions Lewis Kozer, and Ralph Darendorf's theory of conflict. The novelty of the study is revealed through a comprehensive analysis of the experience of Western researchers in the field of pedagogy, as well as the development of new conceptual models. Western researchers assign a passive role to the victim of bullying, thereby depriving her of subjectivity. The authors propose to perceive bullying as a conflict, and bullying not only as bullying but also as a situation of negative leadership.

References

  1. Coser L. The functions of the social conflict. NYC: The free press, 1956. Pp. 8-16.
  2. Krisberg L. Sociology of Social Conflict. N.Y.C, Prentice-Hall, 1973. Pp 10-18.
  3. Darendorpf R. Class and class conflict in industrial society. Stanford University Press. California, 1959. Pp. 50-81.
  4. Trufanov, G. А. Governmental control over information distribution as a basis of the social conflict // Конфликтология. – 2019. – Vol. 14, No. 3. – P. 207-221. – EDN SMRPDE.
  5. Trufanov, G. A. The problem of bullying in schools: conflictological comprehension // Вопросы устойчивого развития общества. – 2021. – No. 9. – P. 115-128. – doi: 10.34755/IROK.2021.72.59.076. – EDN KNGVMN.
  6. Усов, С. С. Эмоционально-оценочная номинация реалий в политическом дискурсе в XXI в / С. С. Усов, М. А. Сафонов, Н. Л. Харченко // Известия Волгоградского государственного педагогического университета. – 2020. – № 3(146). – С. 105-109. – EDN NPTBRS.
  7. Содержательно-подтекстовый аспект информативности дискурса в публицистическом тексте / Н. С. Варфоломеева, С. С. Усов, И. Ю. Багдасарова [и др.] // Вестник Российского нового университета. Серия: Человек в современном мире. – 2021. – № 4. – С. 50-55. – doi: 10.25586/RNU.V925X.21.04.P.050. – EDN BSLJZM.
  8. Языковые средства выражения элементов фантастики в политическом дискурсе / И. А. Синицына, М. А. Сафонов, С. С. Усов [и др.] // Вестник Удмуртского университета. Серия История и филология. – 2021. – Т. 31, № 2. – С. 254-263. – doi: 10.35634/2412-9534-2021-31-2-254-263. – EDN QFOJRR.
  9. Содержательно-подтекстовый слой информативности текста как способ выражения авторской модальности (на примере рассказа И.А. Бунина "в Париже") / Н. Л. Харченко, М. А. Сафонов, С. С. Усов [и др.] // Вестник Удмуртского университета. Серия История и филология. – 2018. – Т. 28, № 3. – С. 419-428. – EDN XVBPRJ.
  10. Trufanov, G. А. Crisis and conflict in Russian contemporary social media // Конфликтология. – 2021. – Vol. 16, No. 1. – P. 132-158. – EDN DZCTXE.
  11. Trufanov, G. A. Modern aspects of conflict management in business organizations in the context of conflict studies in business / G. A. Trufanov // Actual Issues of the Modern Economy. – 2021. – No. 8. – P. 14-23. – doi: 10.34755/IROK.2021.51.36.025. – EDN BPHWSA.
  12. Salmivalli, C., Lagerspetz, K., Björkqvist, K., Österman, K., Kaukiainen, A. (1996). Bullying as a group process: Participant roles and their relations to social status within the group. Aggressive Behavior, 22, 1-15. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2337(1996)22:13.0.CO;2-T
  13. Bayraktar, F., Machackova, H., Dedkova, L., Cerna, A., Ševčíková A. (2015). Cyberbullying: The discriminant factors among cyberbullies, cybervictims, and cyberRunning head: ROLES IN CYBER BULLYING 25 victims in a Czech adolescent sample. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 30, 3192-3216. doi: 10.1177/0886260514555006.
  14. Lam, L. T., Cheng, Z., Liu, X. (2013). Violent online games exposure and cyberbullying/victimization among adolescents. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16, 159-164. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2012.0087.
  15. Selkie, E. M., Kota, R., Chan, Y-F., & Moreno, M. (2015). Cyberbullying, depression, and problem alcohol use in female college students: A multisite study. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 18, 79-86. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2014.0371.
  16. Brack, K., & Caltabiano, N. (2014). Cyberbullying and self-esteem in Australian adults. Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 8, article 7. doi: 10.5817/CP2014-2-7.
  17. Bauman, S. (2010). Cyberbullying in a rural intermediate school: An exploratory study. Journal of Early Adolescence, 30, 803-833. doi: 10.1177/0272431609350927.
  18. Aoyama, I., Bernard-Brak, L., Talbert, T. (2011). Cyberbullying among high school students: Cluster analysis, sex and age differences and the level of parental monitoring. International Journal of Cyber Behavior, Psychology, and Learning, 1, 25-35. doi: 10.4018/ijcbpl.2011010103
  19. Hentig H. Remarks on the Interaction of perpetrator and Victim // The of Criminal and Criminology, 1941. V. 31.
  20. Schoen, S., Schoen, A. (2010). Bullying and Harassment in the United States. The Clearing House, 83(2), 68-72.
  21. Dehue, F. (2013). Cyberbullying research: New perspectives and alternative methodologies. Introduction to the special issue. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 23, 1-6. doi: 10.1002/casp.2139.
  22. Dehue, F., Bolman, C., Völlink, T. (2008). Cyberbullying: Youngsters’ experiences and parental perception. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11, 217-223. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2007.0008.
  23. Brooks, R. A., & Cohen, J. W. (2020). The Nature, Scope, and Response to School Bullying. In Criminology Explains School Bullying (1st ed., Vol. 2, pp. 7–28). University of California Press.
  24. Bloom, A. B. (2020). Building Civic Capacity in Schools and Communities. National Civic Review, 109(1), 6-15.
  25. Grmuša, A. (2023). The effectivnes of video surveillance in preventing and interventing bullyng in secondary schools in Serbia. In F. Alcantud-Marín, Y. Alonso-Esteban, C. Berenguer Forner, M. J. Cantero López, J. C. Meléndez Moral, A. R. Moliner Albero, B. Rosello Miranda, M. del M. Sánchez García, P. Sancho Requena, E. Satorres Pons, N. Senent-Capuz, M. Soriano-Ferrer, P. Viguer Seguí, & A. Ygual Fernández (Eds.), Actas del XI Congreso Internacional de Psicología y Educación. (pp. 2765-2774). Dykinson, S.L.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).