Conflicting Interests of Trading Companies and Causes of the South African War, 1899-1902

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The author examines the economic aspects of the South African colonial exploration by the Europeans in the representation of accumulated contradictions between business organizations, which ultimately became a cause of the 1899-1902 conflict. Based on the study of Dutch East India Company’s activities in this region, as well as the specifics of the settlement establishment by the British and Boers, attention is paid to the root causes of the disharmonious economic situation of the rivalling parties, taking place before the discovery of gold deposits in the Witwatersrand (1886). The changing regional supremacy of the Cape colony and the other British possessions, as well as Boer States (the Republic of South Africa – Transvaal and the Orange Free State) has been periodized. The factors of the 1899 armed conflict have been structured to reveal the conflicting interests of trading companies which had sought to monopolize the business for extraction of valuable mineral raw materials. The author concludes that the main reason for the South African War was the desire of British trading companies to gain access to rich gold deposits in the Boer-populated Transvaal and form a single English-based state in South Africa. In order to achieve such goal, the British tried their best at delaying peace initiatives of the Boers, putting forward various contradictory demands to them, using the armies of private companies to conduct raids and sabotaging the formation of a federal state in the region. We have discovered the preposterous look of the British pretext for the outbreak of war, based on the protection of the Boer states English-speaking population interests, which had been supposed to initiate an uprising. The South African War became not only a place, where new methods of warfare were applied, and a “black hole” for the UK budgetary expenditures, but also a profitable market for new types of weapons and military equipment, which allowed their manufacturers to make considerable profits.

References

  1. Англо-бурская война 1899–1902 годов глазами российских подданных. В 13 томах. Т. 1. М.: Издатель И. Б. Белый, 2012. 438 с.
  2. Балезин А. С., Воеводский А. В., Давидсон А. Б. История Тропической и Южной Африки в Новое и Новейшее время. М.: Институт всеобщей истории РАН, 2010. 327 с.
  3. Давидсон А. Б., Филатова И. А. Англо-бурская война и Россия // Новая и новейшая история. 2000. № 1. С. 31-51.
  4. Cain P. J. A. Hobson, financial capitalism and imperialism in Late Victorian and Edwardian England // The Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History. 1985. Vol. 13. I. 3. P. 1-27. doi: 10.1080/03086538508582691
  5. Cobbin P. E., Burrows G. H. The profession of arms and the profession of accounting numbers – Accounting, the military and war: A review // Accounting History. 2018. Vol. 23. I. 4. P. 487-520. doi: 10.1177/1032373218779188
  6. Cuthbertson G. C. James Stewart and the Anglo-Boer War, 1899–1902: a nonconformist missionary perspective // South African Historical Journal. 1982. Vol. 14. I. 1. P. 68-84. doi: 10.1080/02582478208671567
  7. Cuthbertson G. C. Missionary Imperialism and Colonial Warfare: London Missionary Society Attitudes to the South African War, 1899–1902 // South African Historical Journal. 1987. Vol. 19. I. 1. P. 93-114. doi: 10.1080/02582478708671624
  8. De Bloch M. J. The Transvaal War: Its Lessons in Regard to Militarism and Army Re-Organisation // Royal United Services Institution. Journal. 1901. Vol. 45. I. 285. P. 1316-1344. doi: 10.1080/03071840109419028
  9. Denoon D. Capital and Capitalists in the Transvaal in the 1890s and 1900s // The Historical Journal. 1980. Vol. 23. I. 1. P. 111-132. doi: 10.1017/S0018246X00023943
  10. Denoon D. V. ‘Capitalist Influence’ and the Transvaal Government during the Crown Colony Period, 1900–1906. The Historical Journal. 1968. Vol. 11. I. 2. P. 301-331. doi: 10.1017/S0018246X0000203X
  11. Fairchild F. R. The Financing of the South African War // The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 1902. I. 20. P. 60-84.
  12. Galbraith J. S. British War Measures in Cape Colony, 1900–1902: A Study of Miscalculations and Mismanagement // South African Historical Journal. 1983. Vol. 15. I. 1. P. 68-84. doi: 10.1080/02582478308671577
  13. Gwaindepi A., Siebrits K. ‘Hit your man where you can’: Taxation strategies in the face of resistance at the British Cape Colony, c.1820 to 1910 // Economic History of Developing Regions. 2020. Vol. 35. I. 3. P. 171-194. doi: 10.1080/20780389.2020.1791699
  14. Harries P. Capital, State, and Labour on the 19th Century Witwatersrand: A Reassessment // South African Historical Journal. 1986. Vol. 18. I. 1. P. 25-45. doi: 10.1080/02582478608671604
  15. Harvie C. Technological change and military power in historical perspective // Adelphi Papers. 1978. Vol. 18. I. 144. P. 5-13. doi: 10.1080/05679327808448520
  16. Hutchinson S. Settlers, War, and Empire in the Press. Unsettling News in Australia and Britain, 1863–1902. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017. XI, 288 p. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-63775-4
  17. Jeeves A. H. The Rand capitalists and the coming of the South African war 1896–1899 // South African Journal of Economic History. 1996. Vol. 11. I. 2. P. 55-81. doi: 10.1080/10113439609511085
  18. Johnson-Williams E. ‘The Concertina’s Deadly Work in the Trenches’: Soundscapes of Suffering in the South African War // Nineteenth-Century Music Review. 2023. Vol. 20. I. 1. P. 119-151. doi: 10.1017/S1479409822000040
  19. Jones S. Scouting for Soldiers: Reconnaissance and the British Cavalry, 1899–1914 // War in History. 2011. Vol. 18. I. 4. P. 495-513. doi: 10.1177/0968344511417348
  20. Leeson D. M. Playing at War: The British Military Manoeuvres of 1898 // War in History. 2008. Vol. 15. I. 4. P. 432-461. doi: 10.1177/0968344508095448
  21. Miller S. M. George White and the Victorian Army in India and Africa. Serving the Empire. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2020. IX, 323 p. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-50834-0
  22. Miller S. M., Miller J. Moral and legal prohibitions against pillage in the context of the 1899 Hague Convention and the South African War // War in History. 2019. Vol. 26. I. 2. P. 185-203. doi: 10.1177/0968344517711959
  23. Nasson W. R. Moving Lord Kitchener: black military transport and supply work in the South African War, 1899–1902, with particular reference to the Cape Colony // Journal of Southern African Studies. 1984. Vol. 11. I. 1. P. 25-51. doi: 10.1080/03057078408708087
  24. Phillips G. The Obsolescence of the Arme Blanche and Technological Determinism in British Military History // War in History. 2002. Vol. 9. I. 1. P. 39-59. doi: 10.1191/0968344502wh243oa
  25. Phimister I. Unscrambling the Scramble for Southern Africa: The Jameson Raid and the South African War Revisited // South African Historical Journal. 1993. Vol. 28. I. 1. P. 203-220. doi: 10.1080/02582479308671973
  26. Porter A. The South African War (1899–1902): Context and motive reconsidered // The Journal of African History. 1990. Vol. 31. I. 1. P. 43-57. doi: 10.1017/S0021853700024774
  27. Read D. Reuters and South Africa: “South Africa is a country of monopolies” // South African Journal of Economic History. 1996. Vol. 11. I. 2. P. 104-143. doi: 10.1080/10113439609511087
  28. Riedi E. British Widows of the South African War and the Origins of War Widows’ Pensions // Twentieth Century British History. 2018. Vol. 29. I. 2. P. 169-198. doi: 10.1093/tcbh/hwx051
  29. Siwundhla H. T. White Ideologies and Non-European Participation in the Anglo-Boer War, 1899-1902 // Journal of Black Studies. 1984. Vol. 15. I. 2. P. 223-234. doi: 10.1177/002193478401500206
  30. Smith I. R. The Origins of the South African War (1899–1902): A Re-Appraisal // South African Historical Journal. 1990. Vol. 22. I. 1. P. 24-60. doi: 10.1080/02582479008671654
  31. Smith I. R. The Origins of the South African War, 1899–1902. London; N.Y.: Longman, 1996. XIX, 455 p.
  32. The Shaping of South African society, 1652–1840 / Elphick R., Giliomee H. Eds. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press, 1989. XXI, 623 p.
  33. Van Heyningen E. The Concentration Camps of the South African (Anglo-Boer) War, 1900–1902 // History Compass. 2009. Vol. 7. I. 1. P. 22-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-0542.2008.00562.x
  34. Van Heyningen E. The South African War as humanitarian crisis // International Review of the Red Cross. 2015. Vol. 97. I. 900. P. 999-1028. doi: 10.1017/S1816383116000394
  35. Wisser J. P. The Second Boer War. 1899–1900. Kansas City, MO: Hudson-Kimberly Publishing Co., 1901. 270 p.
  36. Yudelman D. Capital, capitalists and power in South Africa: Some zero‐sum fallacies // Social Dynamics. 1980. Vol. 6. I. 2. P. 59-67. doi: 10.1080/02533958008458287

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).