Types of novelty in the semiotics of creativity
- Authors: Demina A.I.1
-
Affiliations:
- Samara National Research University
- Issue: Vol 21, No 7-8 (2021)
- Pages: 12-18
- Section: Philosophical sciences
- URL: https://ogarev-online.ru/2410-3764/article/view/105023
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.55531/2072-2354.2021.21.4.12-18
- ID: 105023
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The purpose of the article is to identify the main types of novelty from the standpoint of the semiotic theory of creativity. The methodological framework of the research is general semiotics, Friedrich Dessauer’s theory of potential space and the transcendentalist scheme of cognition and activity. Creativity is considered as the transformation of the rules of semiosis at the level of sensory perception, reason or mind in receptive (cognitive) or projective (actually creative) activity. The source and condition for the possibility of creativity is the heterogeneous structure of reality, ontological pluralism, fixed in the concept of “three worlds” by K.R. Popper and the “four kingdoms” by Fr. Dessauer. The subject, object and process of activity are singled out as the main environments for the emergence of novelty, in semiotic terminology presented as a shift in pragmatic, semantic and syntactic rules of sensory perception, reason and mind. The identified types of novelty are illustrated with examples from literary science fiction.
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Anna I. Demina
Samara National Research University
Author for correspondence.
Email: ademina83@gmail.com
specialist in educational and methodological work of the 2nd category, Department of Philosophy
Russian Federation, SamaraReferences
- Hadamard J. Issledovanie psikhologii protsessa izobreteniya v oblasti matematiki. Moscow; 1970. (In Russ.)
- Berdjaev N. Smysl tvorchestva (Opyt opravdaniya cheloveka). Moscow: Izd-vo G.A. Lemana i S.I. Saharova; 1916. (In Russ.)
- Berkli Dzh. Traktat o printsipah chelovecheskogo znaniya. In: Berkli Dzh. Sochineniya. Moscow: Nauka; 1978. P. 152–247. (In Russ.)
- Vygotskij LS. Psihologiya iskusstva. Rostov-na-Donu; 1998. (In Russ.)
- Vysheslavcev B. Serdtse v hristianskoi i indiiskoi mistike. Paris: YMCA PRESS; 1929. (In Russ.)
- Gibson WF. Graf Nol’. Mona Liza Overdraiv. Moscow: AST; 2005. (In Russ.)
- Dessauer F. Spor o tekhnike. Transl. from Germ. A.Yu. Nesterov. Samara, 2017. (In Russ.)
- Kagan MS. Chelovecheskaya deyatel’nost’. (Opyt sistemnogo analiza). Moscow: Politizdat; 1974. (In Russ.)
- Kvetnoj MS. Chelovecheskaya deyatel’nost’: sushchnost’, struktura, tipy (sotsiologicheskii aspekt). Saratov; 1974. (In Russ.)
- Lapshin II. Filosofiya izobreteniya i izobretenie v filosofii: Vvedenie v istoriyu filosofii. Moscow: Respublika; 1999. (In Russ.)
- Leont’ev AN. Problemy razvitiya psikhiki. Moscow: Mysl’; 1965. (In Russ.)
- Morris ChW. Osnovaniya teorii znakov. In: Semiotika: Antologija. Moscow; Ekaterinburg; 2001. Р. 37–89. (In Russ.)
- Nesterov AYu. The essence of technical consciousness within the frame of the semiotic approach. Vestnik of Samara University. Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering. 2015;14(1):235–246. (In Russ.). doi: 10.18287/1998-6629-2015-14-1-235-246
- Nesterov AYu, Demina AI. A work of art as a technical object. Mirgorod. 2019;(1(13)):48–74. (In Russ.)
- Nesterov AYu. Existence and meaning: the matter of semiosis. Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 2014;(4(28)):56–63. (In Russ.)
- Noeth W. Charles Sanders Peirce. Critique and Semiotics. 2001;(3–4):5–32. (In Russ.)
- Popper KR. Vsya zhizn’ – reshenie problem. O poznanii, istorii i politike. Ch. 1: Voprosy poznaniya prirody. Moscow; 2019. (In Russ.)
- Rubinshtejn SL. Osnovy obshchei psikhologii. Moscow; 1946. (In Russ.)
- Jengel’mejer PK. Teoriya tvorchestva. Moscow: Librokom; 2010. (In Russ.)
- Jengel’mejer PK. Filosofiya tekhniki. Saint Petersburg: Lan’; 2013. (In Russ.)
- Jaroshevskij MG. Psychology of creativity and creativity in psychology. Voprosy psihologii. 1985;(6):14–26. (In Russ.)
- Nesterov A. Technology as Semiosis. Technology and Language. 2020;1(1):71–80. doi: 10.48417/technolang.2020.01.16
- Nesterov AY. Clarification of the concept of progress through the semiotics of technology. In: Bylieva D., Nordmann A., Shipunova O., Volkova V. (eds). Knowledge in the Information Society. PCSF 2020, CSIS 2020. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems. 2021;184. Springer, Cham. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-65857-1_1
Supplementary files
