The role of the concept of "abduction of agency" in Eduardo Viveiros de Castro's Amerindian perspectivism and the possibility of applying it to the study of technology
- Authors: Glukhovskii A.S.1, Sergienko A.Y.1
-
Affiliations:
- Issue: No 4 (2025)
- Pages: 56-68
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://ogarev-online.ru/2409-8728/article/view/365360
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/TYUENP
- ID: 365360
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The article is devoted to the study of the concept of "abduction of agency", a term coined by the Brazilian anthropologist Eduardo Viveiros de Castro in his conception of Amerindian perspectivism. The concept was subsequently borrowed by Castro from the works of British anthropologist Alfred Gell. The central objective of the paper is to clarify the meaning of this concept in Viveiros de Castro's Amerindian perspectivism. This elucidation is undertaken to demonstrate the concept's suitability for philosophical and anthropological scrutiny of human interaction with technology. The paper's objectives are threefold: firstly, to provide a general description of the concept of abduction; secondly, to identify the role of the concept of "abduction of agency" in the works of Gell; thirdly, it will prove that Viveiros de Castro's understanding of the "abduction of agency" overcomes the criticism of this concept by British anthropologist, Tim Ingold. The methodological framework encompasses a historico-hermeneutical analysis of abduction in the history of philosophy (from C. S. Peirce to contemporary authors) and a critical-objective comparison of Gell's and Viveiros de Castro's interpretations. The scientific novelty of the article lies in the systematisation of the concept of "abduction of agency", which eliminates the gap in the research of Viveiros de Castro's work and opens prospects for its integration into the philosophy of technology and ethics of artificial intelligence. The practical significance of the work is related to the possibility of using the concept in the model human-technology interactions, where hypotheses are formed in the process of dynamic adaptation to changing conditions. The conclusions of the paper call into question Ingold's criticism, demonstrating that the "abduction of agency", as interpreted by Viveiros de Castro, does not contradict the idea of creativity as improvisation, but, on the contrary, enriches it, offering a new tool for interdisciplinary research.
About the authors
Andrei Sergeevich Glukhovskii
Email: glukhovsky.andrew@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0052-0180
Aleksey Yurievich Sergienko
Email: asergienko@eu.spb.ru
References
Вивейруш де Кастру, Э. Каннибальские метафизики. Рубежи постструктурной антропологии. М.: Ад Маргинем, 2017. 199 с. Viverios de Castro E. Exchanging Perspectives: The Transformation of Objects into Subjects in Amerindian Ontologies // Common Knowledge. 2004. № 10. P. 463-484. Боброва А. С. Аргументативная схема для абдукции // Дискурс. 2023. Т. 9. № 1. С. 5-17. doi: 10.32603/2412-8562-2023-9-1-5-17 EDN: EJOYEC. Hintikka J. Inquiry as Inquiry: a Logic of Scientific Discovery. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1999. 290 p. Боброва А. С. Абдуктивный шаг в диалогах. Неформальный подход // Вестник Томского государственного университета. Философия. Социология. Политология. 2022. № 67. С. 5-16. doi: 10.17223/1998863X/67/1 EDN: WZMMQW. Васюков В. Л. Научное открытие и контекст абдукции // Философия науки и техники. 2003. № 1. C. 180-205. EDN: TPEYMP. Ингольд Т. Погружая вещи в жизнь: творческие переплетения в мире материалов // Неприкосновенный запас. 2021. № 2 (136). С. 31-49. EDN: FQRKZM. Делёз Ж., Гваттари Ф. Тысяча плато: капитализм и шизофрения. М.; Екатеринбург: Астрель; У-Фактория, 2010. 895 с. Пирс Ч. Начала прагматизма. Т. 2. СПб.: Лаборатория метафизических исследований философского факультета СПбГУ; Алетейя, 2000. 318 с. Пирс Ч. Начала прагматизма. Т. 1. СПб.: Лаборатория метафизических исследований философского факультета СПбГУ; Алетейя, 2000. 352 с. Бейтсон Г. Разум и природа: Необходимое единство. Швеция: Philosophical arkiv, 2016. 214 с. Magnani L. Abductive Cognition. The Epistemological and Eco-Cognitive Dimensions of Hypothetical Reasoning. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2009. 535 p. Magnani L. The Abductive Structure of Scientific Creativity: An Essay on the Ecology of Cognition. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Verlag, 2017. 230 p. Пирс Ч. С. Избранные философские произведения. М.: Логос, 2000. 448 с. Негарестани Р. Работа нечеловеческого. Логос. 2021. Т. 31. Eco U. Semiotics and the Philosophy of Language. London: Macmillan, 1984. 242 p. Gell A. Art and Agency: An Anthropological Theory. Oxford: Clarendon, 1998. 271 p. Леви-Стросс К. Путь масок. М.: Республика, 2000. 399 с. Де Лает А., Мол А. Зимбабвийский втулочный насос: механика текучей технологии // Логос. 2017. Т. 27. № 2. С. 171-232. EDN: YMICDF. Глуховский А. С., Дурнев А. Д., Чирва Д. В. Распределенная моральная ответственность в сфере искусственного // Этическая мысль. 2024. Т. 24. № 1. С. 129-143. doi: 10.21146/2074-4870-2024-24-1-129-143 EDN: USICEU. Hutchins E. Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 1995. 381 p. Шиповалова Л. В. Распределенное познание - аналитика и проблематизация концепта // Цифровой ученый: лаборатория философа. 2019. Т. 2. № 4. С. 175-190. doi: 10.5840/dspl20192460 EDN: XIWLNT.
Supplementary files
