The Semiotic Method as an Aspect of the Methodology of Social Philosophy: the Experience of S.S. Averintsev
- Authors: Kuz'min P.A.1
-
Affiliations:
- Issue: No 1 (2023)
- Pages: 42-53
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://ogarev-online.ru/2409-8728/article/view/361990
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/BFRSNT
- ID: 361990
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The subject of the study is the correlation of the application of the semiotic method by S.S. Averintsev with social philosophy. The aim of the work is to demonstrate how and to what extent S.S. Averintsev applied the semiotic method and to identify the belonging of this method to the socio-philosophical field. The author identifies and concretizes the specifically semiotic features of Averintsev's methodology. The role of the sign in the worldview of early Byzantine society, the formation of this worldview and its adequate presentation, the sign as a reflection of the life of society and at the same time as a factor influencing it is revealed. The problem of the sign's ability to convey philosophical and theological meaning is considered. The material for the study is the work of S.S.Averintsev "Poetics of Early Byzantine literature". As a result of the work, the specifically semiotic features of Averintsev's methodology were identified and concretized. In his research, Sergey Sergeevich uses the terms "semiotics", "sign", "sign system", "structure", "context", "representation", "meaning", the concept of "word function" with varying degrees of intensity, which are characteristic of semiotics as a science. S.S. Averintsev touches on philosophical and ideological themes. It concerns such philosophical concepts and topics as being, ontology, anthropology, goodness, transcendence, otherness, meaning. The novelty of the research is due to the fact that the semiotic aspect of Averintsev's works has not been investigated, and there are also no scientific texts devoted to the relationship of the semiotic method and social philosophy in Averintsev's works. Averintsev reveals the correlation of the existence of society with the iconic universe. Being itself is a philosophical concept. Averintsev's work shows how meanings affect signs and the life of society, and at the same time, how signs themselves create new meanings.The Christian worldview presupposes such a view of man and society, in which a person in his unity with God is thought of as a being with the highest value and dignity in the created world.
Keywords
About the authors
Platon Alekseevich Kuz'min
Email: platonkuzmin@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9001-9167
References
Седакова О.А. Слово Аверинцева // Континент. – 2004.-№119 Бибихин В.В. Алексей Федорович Лосев. Сергей Сергеевич Аверинцев – М.: Институт философии, теологии и истории св. Фомы, 2006. – 416 с. Дворникова Е.И. Культура как базис формирования культурной идентичности и толерантной личности в процессе изучения гуманитарных дисциплин: Монография. – СПб.: Наука, САГА, 2009. – 400 с. Фадеева И.Е., Сулимов В.А. Семиозис: Субъективная антропология символической реальности / И.Е. Фадеева, В.А. Сулимов. – СПб.: Издательство «Астерион», 2013. – 252 с. Творения святого отца нашего Иоанна Златоуста, архиепископа Константинопольского, в русском переводе. Том 11, Книга 1. Издание С.-Петербургской Духовной Академии, 1905. С.356-469. Аверинцев С.С. Поэтика ранневизантийской литературы. – М.: «Coda», 1997. – 343 с. Лосев А.Ф. ЗНАК. СИМВОЛ. МИФ. М.: Изд-во Моск. ун-та, 1982. 480 с. Мечковская Н.Б. Семиотика. Язык. Природа. Культура: Курс лекций, учеб. пособие для студ. филол., лингв., и переводовед. фак. высш. учеб. заведений / Н.Б. Мечковская. – 2-е изд., испр. – М. Издательский центр «Академия», 2007. – 432 с. Ю.М. Лотман и тартуско-московская семиотическая школа. М.: «Гнозис», 1994. – 560 с. Квитков Г.Г. Некоторые методологические аспекты работ С.С. Аверницева // Вестник Томского государственного университета. 2013. №372. С.110-113 Ратцингер, Йозеф. Введение в христианство: лекции об апостольском символе веры. Москва: Культурный центр "Духовная библиотека", 2006 (М.: Типография "Наука") – 301 с.
Supplementary files
