Maximizers hyping in Chinese MA learners’ and experts’ academic discourse: An EUM-based study

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The research is to examine the utilization of maximizers as a strategic tool to attain academic rhetorical hype within the realm of Chinese MA theses (CLMA_C) and international journal articles (ILJA_C). Maximizers, which convey heightened intensity and personal commitment, play a crucial role in shaping rhetorical strategies in academic discourse. The study employs the EUM model (Sinclair’s theory of extended units of meaning). By adopting this model, the research makes a significant contribution to elucidating the intricate linguistic choices within scholarly communication. The goal is to analyze the collocation features of the maximizers in CLMA_C and ILJA_C. The goal determines the choice of the subject of research – identifying similarities and differences in the use of maximizers in two databases (international journal articles (ILJA_C) and Chinese MA theses (CLMA_C). The novelty of the research is that the study employs the EUM model to analyze maximizers in CLMA_C and ILJA_C, allowing for a comprehensive examination of both collocational form and contextual meaning. The analysis includes an exploration of lexical patterns, colligation, semantic preference, and semantic prosody, offering a multifaceted understanding of how maximizers contribute to rhetorical strategies. This research uniquely explores maximizers in collocational form and meaning using the EUM model, offering nuanced insights into their role in rhetorical hype and revealing cross-cultural variations through the similarities and significant differences in CLMA_C and ILJA_C. The study contributes significantly to second language acquisition and comparative linguistics, advancing knowledge on maximizers in academic communication. Findings show lexical pattern similarities but significant differences in colligation, semantic preference, and semantic prosody. In CLMA_C, “fully” lacks diverse collocates, with varied colligation patterns influenced by L1 transfer. Regarding semantic prosody, experts adopt a commendatory tone, while Chinese MA learners express an affirmative tone.

References

  1. Ochodo, E. A., de Haan, M. C., Reitsma, J. B., Hooft, L., Bossuyt, P. M., & Leeflang, M. M. (2013). Overinterpretation and misreporting of diagnostic accuracy studies: evidence of “spin”. Radiology, 267(2), 581–588.
  2. Macleod, M. R., Michie, S., Roberts, I., Dirnagl, U., Chalmers, I., Ioannidis, J. P., ... & Glasziou, P. (2014). Biomedical research: increasing value, reducing waste. The Lancet, 383(9912), 101–104.
  3. Liu, G.B., Fanyu, W. & Binghan, Z. (2021). The Local Grammar Patterns of Evaluation in Chinese and Western Scholars' Research Articles. Foreign Languages and Their Teaching, 1(2), 62.
  4. Gilbert, G. & Mulkay, M. (1984). Opening Pandora’s Box: A Sociological Analysis of Scientists’ Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  5. Millar, N., Salager-Meyer, F. & Budgell, B. (2019). “It is important to reinforce the importance of ...”: “Hype” in reports of randomized controlled trials. English for Specific Purposes, 54, 139–151.
  6. Hyland, K., & Jiang, F. K. (2021). ‘Our striking results demonstrate…’: Persuasion and the growth of academic hype. Journal of Pragmatics, 182, 189–202.
  7. Hyland, K. (2005). Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse studies, 7(2), 173–192.
  8. Granger, S. (1998). Prefabricated patterns in advanced EFL writing: Collocations and lexical phrases. Phraseology: Theory, analysis and applications. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  9. Lorenz, G. (2014). Overstatement in advanced learners' writing: stylistic aspects of adjective intensification 1. In: Learner English on computer (pp. 53–66). London: Routledge.
  10. Zhang X.H. (2010). A Corpus-driven Study of Extended Units of Meaning: Taking Maximizers as an Example. Foreign Languages and Their Teaching, 4, 25–30.
  11. Wang, H.H. & Guohua, C. (2007). An Investigation into the Developmental Features of Chinese EFL Learners’ Use of Amplifier Collocations: A Corpus-based Approach. Journal Foreign Languages 167(1), 52–58.
  12. Özbay, A. Ş., & Aydemir, T. (2017). The Use of Maximizers and Semantic Prosodic Awareness of Tertiary Level Turkish EFL Learners. Journal of Education and Practice, 8, 40–50.
  13. Alrajhi, M. (2019). The Semantic Prosody and Semantic Preference of Maximizers in Saudi EFL Writings. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 6(3), 30–39.
  14. Sinclair, J. & Carter, R. (2004). Trust the Text: Language, Corpus and Discourse. London: Routledge.
  15. Quirk, R., Greenbaum, G., Leech, G. & Svartvik, J. (1985). A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
  16. Altenberg, B. (1991). Amplifier collocations in spoken English. In: S. Johansson (Ed.). English Computer Corpora: Selected Papers and Research Guide, pp. 127–130.
  17. Yaoyu, W. E. I., & Lei, L. (2011). The use of amplifiers in the doctoral dissertations of Chinese EFL learners. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 34(1), 47–61.
  18. Partington, A. (2001). Patterns and meanings: using corpora for English language research and teaching. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 6(1), 155–158.
  19. Yu, W. & Li, Zhongzheng. (2017). Corpus-based Research on Extended Meanings of English and Chinese Maximizers. Foreign Language Education, 38(5), 32–37.
  20. Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.
  21. Kennedy, G. (2003). Amplifier collocations in the British National Corpus: Implications for English language teaching. TESOl Quarterly, 37(3), 467–477.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).