Prevention of repeated crimes committed by foreign migrants after serving a non-custodial sentence

The subject of this study is the peculiarities of preventing repeated crimes of foreign migrants after serving a non-custodial sentence. The article analyzes the features of modern criminal policy in terms of the impact on the prevention of repeated crimes of foreign migrants. The purpose of the study is to identify specific factors that contribute to repeat crimes by foreign migrants after they have served a non-custodial sentence, as well as to develop proposals to address the identified problems. The relevance of the study is due to the need to increase the effectiveness of preventing repeated crimes of foreign migrants after they have served a non-custodial sentence. The relevance is confirmed by statistical data on an increase in the number of non-custodial sentences imposed on foreign migrants, as well as an increase in serious and especially serious repeat crimes committed by foreign migrants. The methodological basis of the research is formed by dialectical, formal-logical, system-structural, statistical methods, as well as the method of comparative legal analysis and other methods of scientific research. The scientific novelty lies in the identification of four groups of specific factors influencing the re-commission of crimes by foreign migrants and in the development of modern methods for solving the identified problems. The article analyzes the provisions of current legislation aimed at preventing repeated crimes of foreign migrants, as well as the Convention of the member States of the Commonwealth of Independent States on the Transfer of Execution of Non–custodial Sentences. An assessment is given of the latency of the crime of foreign migrants who have committed crimes for which penalties are imposed that are not related to imprisonment. In order to increase the effectiveness of the prevention of repeated crimes of foreign migrants after serving or executing non-custodial sentences, it is proposed to consider four groups of specific factors: 1) political factors that led to the commission of the first and subsequent crimes; 2) shortcomings in legislation as a factor that does not deter the criminality of migrants; 3) factors related to the activities of courts and law enforcement agencies (shortcomings); 4) weak interaction with law enforcement agencies of foreign states whose citizens commit crimes on the territory of the Russian Federation. Logically formulated solutions are proposed for each group of factors.

punishment, imprisonment, foreign migrants, latency, causes and conditions, prevention, expulsion, correction, fine, convention