Investigative prevention in criminal cases of crimes committed in the field of state defense order

The subject of the study is the regularities of the mechanism of committing a crime, organizational, tactical and legal bases for identifying and eliminating circumstances that contribute to the commission of crimes in the field of state defense orders. The object of the study is illegal activity and investigative prevention in the field of state defense orders. The purpose of the study is to determine the optimal approaches to improving preventive work in criminal cases of crimes committed in the field of state defense orders. Methods of description and generalization of typical circumstances contributing to the commission of crimes and other violations were used in the preparation of the material. The logical method was used to present the material. Dialectical and formal legal methods were used in the study of regulatory legal acts and areas of interaction between the bodies of preliminary investigation and other government agencies for preventive purposes. The novelty of the research lies in obtaining new knowledge about the negative circumstances that contribute to the commission and concealment of a crime at various stages of the implementation of a state defense order, taking into account the specifics of legal regulation. Among such circumstances, there are those that contain signs of administrative offenses. In this regard, the authors conclude that it is necessary to involve specialists of antimonopoly, budgetary, financial and other legislation in the investigation of crimes committed in the field of state defense orders. The intensification of work on attracting specialists in procedural and non-procedural forms is the most promising direction for improving operational and service activities in the designated area. The approximate requirements and recommendations for the elimination of circumstances contributing to the commission of crimes in the field of state defense orders are given.

prevention, criminal case, State defense order, purchases, criminal circumstances, special knowledge, latency, administrative offenses, Antimonopoly Service, budget funds