Theoretical and conceptual foundations of research on religious Conservatism as a social structure in the works of Karl Mannheim and Talcott Parsons
- Authors: Kovalenko V.D.1
-
Affiliations:
- Issue: No 4 (2024)
- Pages: 53-62
- Section: ARTICLES
- URL: https://ogarev-online.ru/2409-7144/article/view/372756
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/JDFYBO
- ID: 372756
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The article is devoted to the study of the theoretical and methodological foundations of the research field of religious conservatism. By itself, religious conservatism as a phenomenon of public life and social structure, since its inception, has had a great influence not only on the religious sphere of society, but also on the political and even economic spheres. The modern research field of religious conservatism is quite diverse, there are a large number of different directions and schools in it, but most of them borrow their methodological foundations from a certain number of classical works on sociology, formed within the framework of mainstream sociological secularism. In this regard, secularism attitudes continue to be reproduced quite often in modern sociological science. The purpose of this work is to examine the early, fundamental theoretical and methodological positions created in classical sociological works on the topic of religious conservatism as a social structure and social phenomenon. To achieve the goal, it was necessary to solve the following tasks: 1) To characterize the works of the early stage of the study of religious conservatism in sociology; 2) To identify and characterize the theories of society in which the main works were created; 3) To define the concept of religious conservatism as a social phenomenon or social structure; 4) Describe the impact of these concepts on further sociological discussion. The research materials were theoretical studies by foreign authors devoted to the conceptualization of the theme of religious conservatism. The research methodology is based on secondary analysis. The results revealed the main patterns of the theoretical foundations of religious conservatism in the works of the classics of sociology.
About the authors
Vladimir Dmitrievich Kovalenko
Email: vl.workvl@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4260-8877
References
Армстронг К. Битва за Бога: история фундаментализма. М: Альпина нон-фикшн, 2013. С. 502. Григоров Е. В. Консерватизм в социально-философской интерпретации К. Мангейма: истоки проблем дефиниции // Философия права. 2016. №1 (74). С. 7-12. Кудряшова И. В. Фундаментализм и «Фундаментализмы» // Полит. наука. 2013. №4. С. 92-105. Манхейм К. Идеология и утопия // Манхейм К. Диагноз нашего времени. М., 1994. С. 1-261. Манхейм К. Консервативная мысль // Манхейм К. Диагноз нашего времени. М., 1994. С. 572-654. Филиппов А. Ф. Ханс Фрайер: социология радикального консерватизма // Фрайер X. Революция справа / Пер. с нем. Ю. Ю. Коринца. М.: Праксис, 2008. С. 144. Bellah R. N. 1967. Civil Religion in America // Daedalus. Vol. 96. P. 1-21. Cavanaugh M.A. 1986. Secularization and the politics of traditionalism: The case of the right-to-life movement. Sociol Forum 1, 251-283. Emerson M. O., Hartman, D. 2006. The Rise of Religious Fundamentalism. Annual Review of Sociology, 32, 127-144. Glass J. 2019 Why Aren't We Paying Attention? Religion and Politics in Everyday Life. Sociol Relig. Jan; 80(1), pp. 9-27. Kettler D., Volker M., Stehr N. 1984. “Karl Mannheim and Conservatism: The Ancestry of Historical Thinking.” American Sociological Review 49, No. 1, pp. 71-85. Lechner F. J. 1985. Fundamentalism and Sociocultural Revitalization in America: A Sociological Interpretation Source: Sociological Analysis, Vol. 46, No. 3, pp. 243-259 Parsons T. 1966 “1965 Harlan Paul Douglass Lectures: Religion in a Modern Pluralistic Society.” Review of Religious Research 7. Parsons T. 1967. Christianity and Modern Industrial Society (1963) // Sociological Theory: Values and Sociocultural Change / ed. by E. A. Tiryakian. N.Y.: Harper & Row. pp. 33-70. Parsons T. 1960. Durkheim’s contribution to the theory of integration of social systems // Emile Durkheim, 1858–1917: A collection of essays, with translations and a bibliography / Ed. by K.H. Wolff. Columbus: Ohio state univ. press. Pp. 118-153. Parsons T. 1966. Religion in a Modern Pluralistic Society // Review of Religious Research. Vol. 7. No. 3. Parsons T. 1966. The Concept of Society: The Components and Their Interrrelations. In: T.Parsons. Societies: Evolutionary and Comparative Perspectives. Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Prentice-Hall, pp. 5-29. Parsons T. 1951. The Social System, Chicago, 1951a Free Press. P. 575. Platt G. M. 1981. ‘The American university’: Collaboration with Talcott Parsons. Sociological Inquiry 51(3–4): 155-165. Smelser N. 1962. Theory of Collective Behavior. Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press. Weber M., 1948. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, trans. by Talcott Parsons (New York: Scribner).
Supplementary files

