Imitation or modernization? Experience of inorganic modernization

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The relevance of the stated topic is due to the fact that the megatrend of the modern era is the modernization of traditional non-Western societies, which, unlike the modernization of Western countries, acquires an inorganic character. At the same time, democratization is declared the most important aspect of the modernization of society as the main prerequisite for dynamic social development. However, modernization processes in the non-Western world often acquire an imitative character, which leads to discrediting the very idea of modernization and weakening its social base. The purpose of this work is to identify the socio–cultural reasons for the emergence of imitation practices in modernizing societies. The theoretical basis of the work is the main provisions of the theory of modernization, as well as the concepts of social imitation presented in the works of A. A. Zinoviev, T. A. Shalyugina, D. E. Furman, etc. The interdisciplinary nature of the work requires a combination of socio-philosophical and cultural approaches to the problem of inorganic modernization of traditional non-Western cultures. Based on the analysis of modern concepts of modernization and imitation, the author proves that imitation is a necessary aspect of society's life, contributing to the development and use of socially useful knowledge, and during periods of modernization it becomes a consequence of asynchronous development of various spheres of the social system, when culture as the most conservative sphere of society does not have time to adapt to the processes occurring in other areas of social life. The desire of elites in the absence of socio-cultural prerequisites for democratic development to accelerate the process of modernization through democratization leads either to a dangerous destabilization of public life, or to imitation of Western European "models". Therefore, in non-Western countries, democratization cannot be the initial stage of modernization, and modernization itself should be gradual, since it should take into account the peculiarities of the culture of a modernizing society, the rhythms and pace of dynamics of various spheres of the socio-cultural system and adjust modernization strategies as the properties of this environment change.

References

  1. Зиновьев А. А. Фактор понимания / Ред. О. М. Зиновьева, А. С. Блинов. М.: Изд. дом «Канон-Плюс» им. Александра Зиновьева, 2023. 392 с.
  2. Шалюгина Т. А. Имитация в современном российском обществе: сущность, субъекты воздействия, социальное пространство проявления. Диссертация … д.ф.н., 09.00.01. Ростов на Дону, 2011. 333 с.
  3. Ожегов С. И. Словарь русского языка / Под ред. Н. Ю. Шведовой. М.: Рус. яз., 1986. 797 с.
  4. Петров М. К. Человек и культура в научно–технической революции // Вопросы философии. 1990. №5. С. 79-92.
  5. Сеннет Р. Мастер. М.: Strelka Press, 2018. 328 с.
  6. Sennett R. Flesh and Stone: The Body and the City in Western Civilization. New York: W.W. Norton, 1993. 431 p.
  7. Lopez R. S. The Commercial Revolution of the Middle Ages, 950-1350. Engewood Cliffs. New York: Prentice-Hall, 1971. 177 p.
  8. Faber T. Stradivarius. London: Macmillan, 2004. 320 p.
  9. Beare Cb., Carlson B. Antonio Stradivari: The Cremona Exhibition of 1987. London: J. and A. Beare, 1993. 328 p.
  10. Rosengard D., Cbiesa C. Guarneri del Gesu: A Breaf History / MetropolitanMuseum catalogue for the exhibition «The Violin Masterpieces of Guarneri del Gesu», London: Peter Biddulph. 1994. 71 p.
  11. Бицилли П. М. Место Ренессанса в истории культуры. СПб.: Мирфил, 1996. XIV + 256 с.
  12. Over H., Carpenter M. The Social Side of Imitation // Child Development Perspectives. 2013. Vol. 7(1). URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/264333297_The_Social_Side_of_Imitation (дата обращения: 05.09.23).
  13. Ellwood C. A. (1901). The Theory of Imitation in Social Psychology // American Journal of Sociology. Vol. 6. Pp. 721-740.URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2762020 (дата обращения: 06.09.2023).
  14. Over H. The social function of imitation in development. Annual Review of Developmental Psychology. 2020. Vol. 2. Pp. 93-109. URL: https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/10.1146/annurev-devpsych-033020-024051 (дата обращения: 06.09.2023).
  15. Powell L. J., Spelke E. S.. Human infants’ understanding of social imitation: Inferences of affiliation from third party observations // Cognition. 2018. Vol. 170. Pp. 31-48. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0010027717302445?via%3Dihub (дата обращения: 05.09.23).
  16. Панарин А. С. Философия политики. М.: Новая школа, 1996. 424 с.
  17. Федотова В. Г. Типология модернизаций и способов их изучения // Вопросы философии. 2000. № 4. С. 3-27.
  18. Пантин В. И., Лапкин В. В. Философия исторического прогнозирования: ритмы истории и перспективы мирового развития в первой половине XXI века. Дубна: Феникс+, 2006. 448 с.
  19. Мухамеджанова Н. М. Социальная имитация: сущность и предпосылки возникновения // Манускрипт. 2019. Т. 12. № 10. С. 171-174.
  20. Tsurutani T. The Politics of National Development, Political Leadership in Transitional Societies. – New York: Abelard-Schuman. 1973. 274 p.
  21. Touraine A. Modernity and Cultural Specificities // International Social Science Journal. 1988. № 4. Рp. 443-457.
  22. Мухамеджанова Н. М. Роль культуры в процессе демократизации общества // Общество, экономика, культура: перспективы научных исследований в информационную эпоху: сборник научных трудов по материалам международной научно-практической конференции. Белгород: АПНИ, 2019. С. 11-15.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).