Surrogacy in Russia: Current Trends in Family Planning in Comparison with Western Countries
- Authors: Ponomarev F.S.1
-
Affiliations:
- Issue: No 3 (2023)
- Pages: 1-8
- Section: ARTICLES
- URL: https://ogarev-online.ru/2409-7144/article/view/370362
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/KUYXBD
- ID: 370362
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to identify trends of surrogacy among the population of Russia in the XXI century. The relevance of the work is due to the interest of sociologists in family planning and the demographic situation in modern Russia, as well as the influence of Western culture on the domestic institution of the family. Methods of statistical and bibliographic analysis were applied. The work was carried out on the basis of a sociological survey. The object of the study is the socio-cultural sphere of Western and Russian society related to childbearing and family planning. The subject of the study is surrogacy. Special attention was paid to the attitude to this phenomenon, as well as modern trends related to surrogacy. The issue was considered both in the legal field and in the social sphere. The main conclusions of the study are: the need to improve the legal framework, the need to improve the protection of the rights of both surrogate mothers and people applying for this service. Nevertheless, in the course of the study, we found out that the sphere of family planning in Russia has not undergone any special changes and citizens still strive for independent childbearing. The scientific novelty of the work lies in the study of the assessment of citizens in relation to the possibility of having a child using surrogate motherhood. It is worth noting that this attribute of family planning is characteristic primarily for citizens of Western countries. The author's special contribution to the study is to establish the fact that there are no contradictions between the development of the traditional concept of family relations and innovations that are actively practiced in the West and form the entire financial industry.
About the authors
Filipp Sergeevich Ponomarev
Email: brigadafila@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6318-794X
References
Артамонова А.В., Митрофанова Е.С. Сожительства в России: промежуточное звено или легитимный институт // Мониторинг общественного мнения: Экономические и социальные перемены. 2016. №1(131). С. 126-145. Антонов А.И., Борисов В.А. Динамика населения России в XXI веке и приоритеты демографической политики. М.: Ключ-С, 2006. 192 с. Борисов В.А., Демографическая дезорганизация России 1897-2007. Избранные демографические труды. М.: NOTA BENE, 2007. 752 с. Бойко В.В. Малодетная семья: социально-психологический аспект. 2-е изд., перераб. и доп. М.: Мысль, 1988. 237 с. Волков А.Г. Семья – объект демографии. М.: Мысль, 1986. 271 с. Опрос: около 90% россиян считают главной задачей женщины заботу о семье. ТАСС. 17.12.2021. URL: https://tass.ru/obschestvo/13224201 (дата обращения 31.03.2023). Синельников А.Б. Трансформация брака и рождаемость в России // Народонаселение. 2019. №2. C. 26-39. Chandra A., Copen C.E., Stephen E.H. Infertility Service Use in the United States: Data From the National Survey of Family Growth, 1982 – 2010. National Health Statistics Reports. Number 73, January 22, 2014. P. 1-21. Assisted Reproductive Technology. National Summary Report, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion CDC. 2016. URL: https://www.cdc.gov/art/reports/2016/national-summary.html10 (дата обращения 26.03.2023). Assisted Reproductive Technology. National Summary Report, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion CDC. 2019. URL: https://www.cdc.gov/art/reports/2019/fertility-clinic.html (дата обращения 26.03.2023). Caldwell J.C. The Mechanisms of Demography Change in Historical Perspective, Population Studies. 1981. Vol. 35, № 1. P.5-27. Utian WH, Sheean L, Goldfarb JM, Kiwi R. Successful pregnancy after in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer from an infertile woman to a surrogate. N Engl J Med. 1985;313:1351-2. doi: 10.1056/nejm198511213132112 Andrews L.B. Surrogate Motherhood: the Challenge for Feminists. Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 April 2021. URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/law-medicine-and-healthcare/article/abs/surrogate-motherhood-the-challenge-for-feminists/B229E96E946994E32B40AF2059305140 (дата обращения 26.03.2023). Surrogacy Market Size By Type (Gestational Surrogacy, Traditional Surrogacy), By Technology (Intrauterine Insemination (IUI), In-vitro Fertilization (IVF) % of U.S. women say ‘feminist’ describes them well; many see feminism as empowering, polarizing. Pew Research Center. URL: https://pewrsr.ch/2DjsXV4 (дата обращения 27.03.2023). Darra L. Hofman D.L. "Mama's Baby, Daddy's Maybe:" A State-by-State Survey of Surrogacy Laws and Their Disparate Gender Impact. William Mitchel Law Review, 2009, Vol. 35, Issue 2, Article 13. URL: https://open.mitchellhamline.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1294&context=wmlr (дата обращения 27.03.2023). Концепция государственной семейной политики в Российской Федерации на период до 2025 года. URL: http://static.government.ru/media/files/MyVeIiu5Nu8.pdf (дата обращения 27.03.2023). Федеральный закон от 21 ноября 2011 г. № 323-ФЗ «Об основах охраны здоровья граждан в Российской Федерации» (с изменениями и дополнениями). URL: https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_121895/?ysclid=lfy5rlulzm90995505819 (дата обращения 27.03.2023). Приказ Министерства здравоохранения РФ от 30 августа 2012 г. N 107н "О порядке использования вспомогательных репродуктивных технологий, противопоказаниях и ограничениях к их применению". URL: https://www.garant.ru/products/ipo/prime/doc/70218364/?ysclid=lfy5tf1y7e906294638 (дата обращения 27.03.2023).
Supplementary files

