Revisiting the Concept of State Sovereignty in the Context of the Transformation of Modern Constitutionalism: From Absolute Sovereignty to "Shared" Sovereignty

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Modern processes of globalization, regional integration, and digitalization create the need to review established approaches to state sovereignty as a key concept of constitutional law. In the context of the transformation of constitutionalism, the importance of studying the mechanisms of redistribution of sovereign prerogatives among the state, international organizations, and other supranational entities increases. The relevance of the topic is determined by the search for a legal balance between preserving national sovereignty and the necessity for effective integration into global processes. The subject of the study is the theoretical and legal foundations and institutional manifestations of the transformation of sovereignty in modern constitutionalism. The forms and limits of "shared" sovereignty are analyzed within the context of contemporary public law. Special attention is paid to the interaction of international and national mechanisms for limiting and reformatting sovereignty. The analysis of the legal positions of the highest judicial instances serves as an empirical basis for substantiating the concept of "shared" sovereignty. The methodological foundation of the research consists of the principles of historicism, systemic and institutional analysis, as well as an interdisciplinary approach that combines legal, political, and philosophical perspectives. The study employs general scientific methods of analysis, synthesis, induction, and deduction, as well as specific legal methods, including comparative legal, formal-legal, and constitutional modeling methods. The novelty of the study lies in the identification of the evolution of the concept of sovereignty from its absolute understanding to the model of "shared" sovereignty within the framework of modern constitutionalism. The work offers an author's vision of the relationship between the national and supranational levels of public authority implementation in the context of legal globalization. It concludes that there is a need for doctrinal and normative rethinking of traditional sovereignty, taking into account modern constitutional practices. The research identifies legal risks and challenges associated with the erosion of the limits of sovereign power. It proposes directions for adapting legal systems to new forms of interstate and supranational interaction. The theoretical basis includes both classical doctrines of sovereignty by J. Bodin and T. Hobbes, and contemporary theories of governance, globalization, and transnational constitutionalism, considering the dynamics of modern legal systems.

About the authors

Sergei Yur'evich Poyarkov

Email: psu70@bk.ru

References

  1. Васильев А.А., Печатнова Ю.В. Трансформация концепции государственного суверенитета в условиях глобализации // Российско-азиатский правовой журнал. 2019. № 3. С. 86-89. EDN: REFVGO.
  2. Krasner S. D. Building Democracy After Conflict: The Case for Shared Sovereignty // Journal of Democracy. 2005. Vol. 16. № 1. С. 69-83.
  3. Matanock A. M. Governance Delegation Agreements: Shared Sovereignty as a Substitute for Limited Statehood // Governance. 2014. Vol. 27. № 4. С. 589-612.
  4. Туманов В.А. Буржуазная правовая идеология. К критике учений о праве. М.: Наука, 1971. 384 с.
  5. Поленина С.В. Система права и система законодательства в современных условиях // Правоведение. 1987. № 5. С. 29-37. EDN: TWPVTX.
  6. Интеграционное право в современном мире: сравнительно-правовое исследование: монография / отв. ред. Кашкин С.Ю. М.: Проспект, 2015. 416 с.
  7. Slaughter A-M. Disaggregated Sovereignty: Towards the Public Accountability of Global Government Networks // Government and Opposition. 2004. Vol. 39. № 2. С. 159-190.
  8. Walker N. Constitutionalism and the Incompleteness of Democracy: An Iterative Relationship // Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy. 2010. № 3. С. 206-233.
  9. Krasner S. D. Abiding Sovereignty // International Political Science Review. 2001. Vol. 22. № 3. С. 229-251.
  10. Боден Ж. Шесть книг о государстве / пер. с фр. Н. А. Хачатурян // Антология мировой правовой мысли. В 5 т. Т. 2. Европа V-XVII вв. / под ред. Н. А. Крашенинниковой. М.: Мысль, с. 688-695.
  11. Sarkar J. Debating a Post-Westphalian International Order // Mainstream Weekly. 2015. Vol. LIII. № 15.
  12. Weiler J. H. H. The Transformation of Europe // The Yale Law Journal. 1991. Vol. 100. № 8. С. 2403-2483.
  13. Peters A. Sovereigns as Trustees of Humanity: On the Accountability of States to Foreign Stakeholders // Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies. 2011. Vol. 18. Iss. 2. С. 517-536.
  14. Pernice I. Multilevel Constitutionalism and the Crisis of Democracy in Europe // European Constitutional Law Review. 2015. Vol. 11. Iss. 3. С. 541-562.
  15. Zuboff S. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. New York: PublicAffairs, 2019.
  16. Mikler J. Sharing Sovereignty for Policy Outcomes // Policy and Society. 2011. Vol. 30. Iss. 3. С. 151-160.
  17. Lange B., Herlo A., Ibert M. Rethinking Geographies of Sovereignty: Towards a Conceptual Framework of Situated Sovereignty // Geography Compass. 2023. Vol. 17. Iss. 2.
  18. Habermas J. Human Rights and Popular Sovereignty: The Liberal and Republican Versions // Ratio Juris. 1994. Vol. 7. Iss. 1. С. 1-13.
  19. Moravcsik A. The Choice for Europe: Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press, 1998. 514 p.
  20. Cohen J. L. Whose Sovereignty? Empire versus International Law // Ethics & International Affairs. 2004. Vol. 18. Iss. 3. С. 1-24.
  21. Соколова А. А. Проблема суверенитета и особенности политической трансформации государства в условиях глобализации // Власть. 2009. № 12. С. 45-48. EDN: KYVEZP.
  22. Sassen S. Territory, Authority, Rights: From Medieval to Global Assemblages. Princeton University Press, 2006.
  23. Held D. Democracy and the Global Order: From the Modern State to Cosmopolitan Governance. Stanford University Press, 1995.
  24. Vibert F. The Rise of the Unelected: Democracy and the New Separation of Powers. Cambridge University Press, 2007.
  25. Krasner S. D. Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy. Princeton University Press, 1999.
  26. Kumm M. The Cosmopolitan Turn in Constitutionalism: An Integrated Conception of Public Law // Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies. 2013. Vol. 20. Iss. 2. Art. 4.
  27. Sovereignty in Transition. Ed. by Neil Walker. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2003. XII, 556 pp.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).