Ontological-Societal Security Node as a Phenomenon of the Digital Environment


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

This study is dedicated to the conceptualization of the phenomenon of the ontological-societal security node in the context of the digital environment. The author demonstrates how the rapid development of digital technologies transforms the mechanisms of social integration, necessitating a reconsideration of traditional security approaches. In this context, the research analyzes the processes of interpenetration between ontological and societal security, driven by technological transformations. The research presents an original structural model of the ontological-societal security node, comprising three interrelated components: ontological, societal, and temporal. The ontological aspect includes identity, trust, and existential stability; the societal aspect encompasses collective identity, social ties, and institutional norms; the temporal aspect reveals historical continuity, transformation dynamics, and the degree of future predictability. The proposed model serves as an effective tool for studying digital risks, including identity fragmentation, social disintegration, and the influence of algorithmic systems on behavioral norms. The study highlights that digitalization not only accelerates the evolution of social structures but also intensifies their interdependence, forming a complex system of interactions between ontological and societal security. Information technologies permeate all aspects of the ontological-societal security node, reshaping identity, trust, social ties, and institutional norms. They blur the boundaries between the personal and the public, accelerate transformation processes, generate temporal disruptions, and alter the dynamics of social interactions. Network algorithms create information bubbles, affecting collective memory, future predictability, and mechanisms for managing digital risks, thereby exacerbating societal fragmentation. Incorporating the temporal component into the model allows for consideration of historical continuity, the pace of change, and the degree of future predictability, which play a crucial role in the adaptation of social systems to the challenges of the digital age. This research holds both scientific and practical significance by offering a novel methodological approach to analyzing digital security. The concept of the ontological-societal security node opens new prospects for further studies and can be applied in the development of strategies for societal adaptation to technological challenges.

About the authors

Oxana I. Elkhova

Ufa University of Science and Technology

Author for correspondence.
Email: oxana-elkhova@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5052-5935
SPIN-code: 1004-6360

DSc in Philosophy, Associate Professor, Professor of the Department of Philosophy and Cultural Studies

32 Zaki Validi St., Ufa, 450076, Russian Federation

References

  1. Lynn-Jones SM. Realism and Security Studies. In: Booth K, editor. Contemporary Security and Strategy. London: Palgrave Macmillan; 2012. P. 17-44. doi: 10.1007/978-1-137-32713-0_2
  2. Lynn-Jones SM. Offense-Defense Theory and Its Critics. Security Studies. 1995;4(4):660-691. doi: 10.1080/09636419509347600
  3. Mangrum K. Book review of «Global Security in the Twenty-First Century: the Quest For Power and the Search For Peace» by Sean Kay. International Journal of Nuclear Security. 2018;4(1). Available from: h=ps://trace.tennessee.edu/ijns/vol4/iss1/11 (accessed: 01.12.2024).
  4. Kay S. Global Security in the Twenty-First Century: The Quest for Power and The Search for Peace. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield; 2006.
  5. Buzan B, Wæver O, de Wilde J. Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers; 1998.
  6. Wæver O. Societal Security: the Concept. In: Wæver O, Buzan B, Kelstrup M, Lemaitre L, editors. Identity, Migration and the New Security Agenda in Europe. London: Pinter; 1993. P. 17-40.
  7. Keller AG. Societal Evolution: A Study of the Evolutionary Basis of the Science of Society. New York: Macmillan Company; 1915.
  8. Parsons T. The Social System. Sedova LA, Kovalev AD, transl. Chesnokova VF, Belanovsky SA, editors. Moscow: Akademicheskiy proekt publ.; 2019. (In Russian).
  9. Parsons T. Some Problems of General Theory in Sociology. In: Parsons T, editor. Social Systems and the Evolution of Action Theory. New York: Free Press; 1977. P. 229-269.
  10. Parsons T. The System of Modern Societies. Sedova LA, Kovalev AD, transl. Kovaleva MS, editor. Moscow: Aspect Press publ.; 1998. (In Russian).
  11. Buzan B. People, States and Fear: An Agenda for International Security Studies in the Post-Cold War Era. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf; 1991.
  12. Waever O, Buzan B, Kelstrup M, Lemaitre P. Identity, Migration and the New Security Agenda in Europe. London: Pinter; 1993.
  13. Thiel M. Identity, Societal Security and Regional Integration in Europe. Jean Monnet. Robert Schuman Paper Series. 2007;7(6):1-15.
  14. Laing RD. The Divided Self. Kravchenko N, Kovtun T, transl. Kyiv; 1995. (In Russian).
  15. Giddens A. Modernity and Self-Identity. California: Stanford University Press; 1991.
  16. Floyd R. Ontological vs. Societal Security: Same Difference or Distinct Concepts? International Politics. 2024;61(3). doi: 10.1057/s41311-024-00581-w EDN: ZLKLGO
  17. Elkova OI. The Phenomenology of Virtual Reality Perception. Vestnik of the Northern (Arctic) Federal University. Series: Humanities and Social Sciences. 2024;24(5):97-106. (In Russian). doi: 10.37482/2687-1505-V378 EDN: ZHIDWG
  18. Elkova OI. Metrics of Phenomenological Virtual Experience. RUDN Journal of Philosophy. 2024;28(4):997-1013. (In Russian). doi: 10.22363/2313-2302-2024-28-4-997-1013 EDN: JLFZMM

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).