Right Attributions to Rivers: From Bio-Cultural Rights to the Rights of Future Generations

Capa

Citar

Texto integral

Resumo

The research shows how the movement of the rights of rivers has open new spaces for subjugated people in Latin America such as Afro-decendent communities, indigenous communities, or the future generations to inject radically different legal and philosophical traditions. The research explores two pioneer cases of right attributions to rivers: Comunidades Afrodescendientes del Rio Atrato v. Presidencia de la Republica de Colombia (Afro-Colombian Indigenous Communities of the Atrato river v. Presidency of the Republic of Colombia) and Las Generaciones Futuras v. Ministerio del Medio Ambiente y Desarollo Sostenible (Future Generations v. The Ministry of Environment and Sustainable Development). These cases show that the rights of rivers are a necessary condition for human survival.

Sobre autores

Danny Marrero

University of Texas Rio Grande Valley

Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: danny.marrero@utrgv.edu
ORCID ID: 0000-0001-8322-4883

- LLM, JD, PhD, Assistant Professor of the Department of Philosophy, Music, Science and Learning Center (BMSLC)

1 University Drive, Brownsville, 78520, United States of America

Bibliografia

  1. Tanasescu M. Understanding the Rights of Nature: A Critical Introduction. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag; 2022. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783839454312
  2. Stone C. Should Trees Have Standing? Towards Legal Rights for Natural Objects. Southern California Law Review. 1972;45:450-501.
  3. Stutzin G. La Naturaleza de los Derechos y los Derechos de la Naturaleza. Atenea: Revista de Ciencia, Arte y Literatura. 1978;(438):37-52. https://doi.org/10.29393/At438-24NDGS10024
  4. Stutzin G. Un Imperativo Ecológico: Reconocer los Derechos de la Naturaleza. Ambiente y Desarrollo. 1984;1(1):97-114.
  5. Calzadilla P. ‘A Paradigm Shift in Courts’ View on Nature: The Atrato river and Amazon Basin Cases in Colombia. Law, Environment and Development Journal. 2019;15(1):49-59.
  6. Nickel J. Can a Right to Health Care Be Justified by Linkage Arguments? Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics. 2016;37(4):293-306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-016-9369-5
  7. Nickel J. Linkage Arguments For and Against Rights. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 2021;42(1):27-47. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqab020
  8. Corrigan D. Human Rights and Rights of Nature: Prospects for a Linkage Argument. In: Corrigan D, Oksane M, editors. Rights of Nature: A Re-examination. New York: Routledge; 2021. P. 101-120. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367479589-7
  9. Gosseries A. What is Intergenerational Justice? Cambridge: Polity Press; 2023. https://doi.org/10.3998/jpe.6267 EDN: YXFVHC

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).