Conceptual Framework for Enhancing Government-Citizen Engagement Amid Digital Transformation in Contemporary Russia

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Optimizing government-citizen engagement amid Russia’s digital transformation requires a comprehensive approach that extends beyond technological solutions. To systematically analyze this issue, this study proposes and theoretically substantiates an integrative five- component conceptual model, which includes: technological infrastructure, an institutional and legal framework, mechanisms for civic participation, informational openness, and an environment of trust. The model’s validation, based on a series of expert focus groups with representatives from government, business, and the academic community, reveals a significant asymmetry in the development of its components. Despite technological progress, the research identifies a profound deficit of trust in the state’s digital initiatives, skepticism regarding the actual impact of e-participation mechanisms, and a weak dialogue between the authorities and society. The study argues that effective optimization is impossible without fundamental changes aimed at building trust, ensuring genuine citizen participation, increasing transparency, and improving institutions. Based on this analysis, practical recommendations for public policy are formulated.

About the authors

Svetlana S. Morozova

Saint-Petersburg University

Author for correspondence.
Email: s.s.morozova@spbu.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7069-7208

PhD in Political Sciences, Senior Researcher, Docent, Department of Russian Politics, School of Political Science

St Petersburg, Russian Federation

References

  1. Alimov, E.V., & Pomazanskiy, A.E. (2020). Deliberative democracy: New challenges and opportunities in the information society. Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law, 83(4), 47–66. https://doi.org/10.12737/jflcl.2020.031 EDN: UWKRAR
  2. Alonso, S., Keane, J., & Merkel, W., (Eds.). (2011). The future of representative democracy. Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from https://assets.cambridge.org/97811070/03569/frontmatter/9781107003569_frontmatter.pdf
  3. Barber, B. (1995). Participatory democracy. In Encyclopedia of Democracy (vol. 3, p. 923). Routledge.
  4. Blumler, J.G., & Coleman, S. (2015). Democracy and the media — Revisited. Javnost — The Public, 22(2), 111–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2015.1041226
  5. Coleman, S. (2018). Can the Internet strengthen democracy?. Aletheia.
  6. Dahl, R. (2000). On democracy. Aspent Press.
  7. Dobrinskaya, D.E., & Martynenko, T.S. (2019). Prospects for the Russian information society: Levels of the digital divide. RUDN Journal of Sociology, 19(1), 108–120. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2272-2019-19-1-108-120 EDN: VUHAGN
  8. Dunleavy, P., & Margetts, H. (2025). Data science, artificial intelligence and the third wave of digital era governance. Public Policy and Administration, 40(2), 185–214. https://doi.org/10.1177/09520767231198737
  9. Habermas, J. (2001). The inclusion of the other: Studies in political theory. Nauka.
  10. Malodia, S., Dhir, A., Mishra, M., & Bhatti, Z. (2021). Future of e-­Government: An integrated conceptual framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 173, 121102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121102
  11. Mircică, N. (2020). Restoring public trust in digital platform operations: Machine learning algorithmic structuring of social media content. Review of Contemporary Philosophy, 19, 85–91. https://doi.org/10.22381/RCP1920209
  12. Morozova, S. (2024). Formation of a dynamic model for optimizing e-­government in the Russian Federation under new challenges and risks. Political Expertise: POLITEX, 19(3), 415–430. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu23.2023.304 EDN: HTLNOC
  13. Morozova, S.S. (2025). Digital dialogue: The role of social media and digital platforms in communication between the state and the citizen. Creative Economy, 19(1), 9–30. https://doi.org/10.18334/ce.19.1.122329 EDN: VJBIQK
  14. Nosonov, A.M. (2015). The theory of diffusion of innovations and the innovative development of Russian regions. Pskov Journal of Regional Studies, 23, 3–16. EDN: UWPERL
  15. Parkinson, J., & Mansbridge, J. (Eds.). (2012). Deliberative systems: Deliberative democracy at the large scale. Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from https://voidnetwork.gr/wp-­content/uploads/2016/09/Deliberative-­Systems-by-­John-Parkinson-­and-Jane-J-Mansbridge.-.pdf
  16. Pateman, C. (2012). Participatory democracy revisited. Perspectives on Politics, 10(1), 7–19.
  17. Rogers, E., Singhal, A., & Quinlan, M. (2019). Diffusion of innovations. In An integrated approach to communication theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 415–433). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203710753-35
  18. Sassen, S. (2002). Towards a sociology of information technology. Current Sociology, 50(3), 365–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392102050003005
  19. Shchekotin, E.V. (2020). Digital technologies in the social sciences: The subject and method of digital sociology. Sociology and Law, 1(47), 49–59. https://doi.org/10.35854/2219-6242-2020-1-49-59 EDN: EVEDKP
  20. Smorgunov, L.V. (2019). Participatory public governability: Platforms and cooperation. Power, 27(5), 9–19. https://doi.org/10.31171/vlast.v27i5.6712 EDN: ULUOEO
  21. Van Dijk, J. (2012). The evolution of the digital divide: The digital divide turns to inequality of skills and usage. In Digital enlightenment yearbook 2012 (pp. 57–75). IOS Press. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-057-4-57
  22. Volodenkov, S.V. (2016). Evolution of traditional institutions of representative democracy in the post-­information society: Problems and prospects. Electoral Legislation and Practice, 3, 47–51. EDN: YPMUPP

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).